GRL
Author
Discussion

luckyp

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

254 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
Who is booked in with GRL Friday?

Pete

gtr-gaz

5,281 posts

275 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
You?

luckyp

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

254 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
Na - I'm in on Monday.

I'm thoroughly pi55ed off and confused at the moment. Here is the situation:

Engine failed emission - O/S 0.18% CO Pass HC 909ppm Pass, n/s 0.21 CO Pass but HC 1345ppm - FAIL!

The symptoms were that I couldn't get the thing to idle below 1100, my eyes were stinging like sh1te when trying to adjust the throttle stop. It would stall at junctions and low speed manouvering is a nightmare.

Factory say go to the retest and phone them to have instruction on how to lower the HC during the test. Once passed they will agjust it during the safety check FOC.

GRL say that they will alter the timing.

Gail at AS says (from my description of the symptoms) that he think the carb is bleeding and needs a clean

and Charles Dunn thinks that I should get rid of the electric choke!!

Well I just wanna pass the fooking SVA

Anyone got any ideas??????????

Pete

gtr-gaz

5,281 posts

275 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
luckyp said:
Na - I'm in on Monday.

The symptoms were that I couldn't get the thing to idle below 1100, my eyes were stinging like sh1te when trying to adjust the throttle stop. It would stall at junctions and low speed manouvering is a nightmare.

Welcome to the world of high performance motors!



luckyp said:

GRL say that they will alter the timing.

He is good at tuning motors. It will be different when he is done with it.


luckyp said:

.....the carb is bleeding..

The EFI guys will tell you those words are in the wrong order


luckyp said:

Charles Dunn thinks that I should get rid of the electric choke!!

I binned my electric choke within a couple of weeks and not regreted it.


I also get confused when mechanics and engine builders slag each other off. I don't know why they do it?

stig

11,823 posts

313 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
Definitely ditch the choke Pete.

splatspeed

7,491 posts

280 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
retarding the timing will idle it better but remove top end performance you should be able to get through SVA

second option borrrow my standard engine no mods at all just a stright engine should idle at 600 rpm

sean

luckyp

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

254 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
I'm gonna call Gail when I'm with Ian Smith of GRL - then the two of them can decide together what Ian should do.

If anyone thinks of an easier win, please let me know.

Pete

GTRMikie

874 posts

277 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
luckyp said:
I'm gonna call Gail when I'm with Ian Smith of GRL - then the two of them can decide together what Ian should do.

If anyone thinks of an easier win, please let me know.

Pete


I don't think Ian will require any assistance to sort it out.

luckyp

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

254 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
Yeah - I rather got that impression a few minites ago. Being a Project Manager by trade, I can't help trying to get people to talk to achieve a common goal. I put this to Ian, and was told in no uncertain terms that this is what he does for a living and he won't need to talk to Gail. Hush my mouth!

I don't doubt for a minute thet Ian will resolve my issue, I just wanted to ensure that what he had planned had the endorcement of the guy who put the engine together - make sense?

This'll test my love of the unknown to the max - just wait for the next installment!

Lucky

Rubi

51 posts

250 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
splatspeed said:
retarding the timing will idle it better


Nope retarding it will generally make the idle worse. But it will start better and it will be less likely to detonate.

I found with my engine (non AS) that as supplied the timing was OK at 3000 rpm+ on load but far too retarded at idle. Changed the vacuum can and the advance weights to get good advance at idle but not too much at higher rpm. Now it idles well, doesn't atall when you brake and pulls like a train.

PS mine also had (massively) high HC on SVA turned out that the fuel pressure was too high. The float valve in the carb couldn't stop the fuel flow so it just ran it into the engine which spat it out the back. The clue was the 5mph fuel economy!

Edited by Rubi on Thursday 8th June 17:36

canam-phil

499 posts

288 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
Ian at GRL checked my fuel pressure as part of his process of tuning and recommended a pressure regulator for just that reason. Wasnt causing a problem with the Holley but felt it was worthwhile.. so I fitted it.

He is a good man at tuning these carbs so just trust him! He is very thorough.

luckyp

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

254 months

Thursday 8th June 2006
quotequote all
OK guys - I'll reel my neck back in and go with the flow.

It's becoming quite apparent that everyone has their own opinion and different views on tuning.

Thanks for your views.

LP

luckyp

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

254 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
I have no regulator - I asked the factory but was told it wasn't necessary - could this be my problem?

Rubi

51 posts

250 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
luckyp said:
I have no regulator - I asked the factory but was told it wasn't necessary - could this be my problem?



Maybe, but to be honest your HC's are not even on the same planet as mine were (I was somewhat >2800!!!).

The only way to be sure is to measure the fuel pressure at the carb inlet, 3 to 4 psi is more than enough, if it is more than 6 psi you will need a pressure regulator to reduce it. I had about 15 psi but I was not using the factory electric fuel pumps, so the chances are that if you have the factory set-up them you'll be OK. Wait and see what your man from GRL says.

canam-phil

499 posts

288 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
I should have said I had the factory pumps and Ian suggested the pressure was too high and that a regulator would be his recommendation.

I look forward to hearing the results.

Lucky, where are you in Surrey? I'm near Guildford.

luckyp

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

254 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
Dorking - freaky!

I have a tight time schedule, if I get the 'oh, I think you need a regulator - that'll be three days' do you think thatit is worth getting one to take to GRL with me?

luckyp

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

254 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
Scrap that - Gail just told me that 6.5 psi is fine.

Pete

gtr-gaz

5,281 posts

275 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
What age is your engine?
Surely all AS units are pre 1975, which means visual inspection only

canam-phil

499 posts

288 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
I would think that Ian will be keeping the car for a few days is that not so?

If so, he could get a regulator from say Real Steel overnight if needed. He tuned my canam without the reg and I added it later.

The reg is not just an emissions issue. From memory, my pressure was 7psi and Ian was aiming for 3 to 4 for non-track work. I adjusted the pressure for my track sessions.



Edited by canam-phil on Friday 9th June 17:14

luckyp

Original Poster:

6,243 posts

254 months

Friday 9th June 2006
quotequote all
It says 1973 on the AS invoice and a GM Certificate saying as 1973 - 198(I forget) spec engine. Tha SVA man wanted more proof that it was manufactured on or before 1973, from the manufacturer.

That I don't have.

Pete