took some material off
took some material off
Author
Discussion

donkeasy

Original Poster:

636 posts

246 months

Friday 25th June 2010
quotequote all
Took some material of these,
don't know the english word.
saves weight on the front suspension.
What do you think...take more off?

[URL=http://img155.imageshack.us/i/149n.jpg/][/URL]

Uploaded with [URL=http://imageshack.us]ImageShack.us[/URL]

And yes of course we did
"a technical analises at the university"
before starting

Edited by donkeasy on Friday 25th June 21:23

738 driver

1,202 posts

217 months

Friday 25th June 2010
quotequote all
Very nice......I'd thought about extending them slightly to improve road steering authority.

donkeasy

Original Poster:

636 posts

246 months

Saturday 26th June 2010
quotequote all
thx
extending in dutch means stretching/making longer.
Then the steering would be more indirect.
I don't think that's what you mean, plaese explain.


738 driver

1,202 posts

217 months

Saturday 26th June 2010
quotequote all
Having driven a couple of examples on UK minor roads (uneven) I thought the steering became quite nervous as speed increased. Hence the idea of gaining more precise authority by extending the arm's.......more appropriate than a larger steering wheel perhaps?

donkeasy

Original Poster:

636 posts

246 months

Saturday 26th June 2010
quotequote all
Oh I understand now. Could do that.

Maybe a steeringdamper could be an option also.


andygtt

8,345 posts

288 months

Saturday 26th June 2010
quotequote all
738 driver said:
Having driven a couple of examples on UK minor roads (uneven) I thought the steering became quite nervous as speed increased. Hence the idea of gaining more precise authority by extending the arm's.......more appropriate than a larger steering wheel perhaps?
How much did you extend it by? could give the car bump steer though and make it more nervous although careful positioning of the rack could sort that.

Must admit I never found mine nervous at high speed.

738 driver

1,202 posts

217 months

Saturday 26th June 2010
quotequote all
Still on with my own build so not carried out the mod as yet Andy.
Seems when you hit a bump/series of them at speed those big 18's want to do their own thing and point the car anywhere but straight! So the idea was to create a longer lever to help control them rather than the tyres controlling you.......make it a little more user friendly on uneven roads I suppose.

donkeasy

Original Poster:

636 posts

246 months

Saturday 26th June 2010
quotequote all
Sounds like more caster could help also.


YIIHAA

338 posts

276 months

Sunday 27th June 2010
quotequote all
To have the effect you want you'd have to shorten the arms. Longer arms give a greater steering angle for a given steering wheel position.

738 driver

1,202 posts

217 months

Sunday 27th June 2010
quotequote all
......hmm not sure I have my head around that.....the further you move from the hub pivot's (ball joint centres) more track rod end movement will be required to achieve the same angle of deflection of the stub axle....as the radius has increased....I think?

GTRCLIVE

4,193 posts

307 months

Sunday 27th June 2010
quotequote all
YIIHAA said:
To have the effect you want you'd have to shorten the arms. Longer arms give a greater steering angle for a given steering wheel position.
Are you sure.... think Leverage.... Longer arm from centre of KPI means more rack movement for same steering angle on outside wheel, so easier to turn, but you end up with less lock and a bigger turning circle.
Also as well as Bump steer (which can be dialed out with some time and effort), you are changing the Ackerman angle (Angle difference between inside and out-side wheels on turn in). I have no idea how that changes the feel of the car....

donkeasy

Original Poster:

636 posts

246 months

Sunday 27th June 2010
quotequote all
Making the arms longer can give a lot of different problems
Steeringdamper and more caster/castor could be a solution.


Steve_D

13,801 posts

282 months

Sunday 27th June 2010
quotequote all
donkeasy said:
Took some material of these,
don't know the english word.
saves weight on the front suspension.
What do you think...take more off?
..........
And yes of course we did
"a technical analises at the university"
before starting
It worries me when someone takes an existing part, machines lumps out of it, claims to have done the analysis then asks "Should I take some more off".

If the analysis was done properly (I don't know where you would find the correct base data to use) then the correct amount has been removed, no more, no less.

How much weight has actually been saved and what impact will it have on the vehicle performance.

Steve

Davrianman

487 posts

288 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
I remember a similar discussion on these arms some time ago when aluminium replacement parts were proposed. I think the Ultima factory took a pretty dim view of it (rightly so too) as these are highly stressed items. I personally would be very careful modifying them in this way, as a failure here would result in a big accident...

I understand the calcs you could perform to work out normal stresses, but what would happen if you hit a curb at speed? Suddenly you are above normal steering loads and a failure could result.

I'm all in favour of modifying and improving things, but I would use high strength steel such an EN24 or titanium if I was doing this mod. As far as I am aware, the factory arms are mild steel, which has a yield of around 300MPa. A high strength steel (EN24 or S99) or titanium is around 1000 to 1200MPa, which would give you an extra reserve factor of 3-4.

Cheers

Mart

Edited to add:
Looking again at the pictures, I would also say that the strengthening web you have left would had been more effective if it was on the faces against and away from the hub (i.e. at 90 deg from where it is), as this is the direction of load. Did you perform an FEA analysis on the part during your calcs? Don't want to critisise, but again, this is a critical component.

Edited by Davrianman on Monday 28th June 00:35

ezakimak

1,871 posts

260 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
I have been working with a small group of people to design a entry level race car.

Having just gone through the process of designing uprights from scratch for our race car, the biggest problem area we found was not outright strength of the upright. That was fairly easy to get right. The problem area that we have encountered was trying to achieve the required amount of stiffness in the steering arm.
Think of the car as a 300kg formula ford with some wings.

Test criteria
4g bump
2g acceleration/braking/lateral load
Less than 0.1 degrees of deflection at this load.

Like I said. Getting something stiff enough was the main problem.

http://www.racemagazine.com.au/index.php?option=co...


Ryan

donkeasy

Original Poster:

636 posts

246 months

Monday 28th June 2010
quotequote all
thx for your concerns, and thoughts.
"Shall I take more off", is of course meant as a teaser.

In my opinion the part is, due to productioncosts,
left with too much material, so we all could affort the car, thx TED.
And of course I am over-engineering, because the part was okee.

As you know the thing is bolted on to the hub.
Between the bolts there was no problem, to take even more material off.
But I liked the way it looked now, so I stopped.
The other part/side, stikking out, is not made thinner.
Only took of the material, that did not bring much.




Edited by donkeasy on Monday 28th June 11:27