Looking for a 3D TV. What numbers make it a good one?
Looking for a 3D TV. What numbers make it a good one?
Author
Discussion

DeanR32

Original Poster:

1,840 posts

205 months

Tuesday 27th December 2011
quotequote all
I think I might treat the house to a new 3D TV but don't know what all the numbers mean.

I want a good picture and want my little boy to try grabbing stuff coming out of it, but what spec do I need?

What is 1080p mean and is it the best? How about 50 and 60hz? What is best and is there better?

Anyone know what to look out for and who makes the better TV's these days?

Thanks in advance

sjg

7,639 posts

287 months

Tuesday 27th December 2011
quotequote all
Personally, I'd be looking at passive 3D TVs if I was buying at all - most of the ones out there are LG models (look for "Cinema 3D" branding).

These use the same simple, cheap glasses as you use at the cinema, so you can have plenty of spares for when you have visitors and no worries about kids breaking £100+ pairs of active 3D glasses. The sets that use passive are pricier than active but the cost evens out nicely if you need 3-4 or more pairs of glasses.


mrmr96

13,736 posts

226 months

Tuesday 27th December 2011
quotequote all
sjg said:
Personally, I'd be looking at passive 3D TVs if I was buying at all - most of the ones out there are LG models (look for "Cinema 3D" branding).

These use the same simple, cheap glasses as you use at the cinema, so you can have plenty of spares for when you have visitors and no worries about kids breaking £100+ pairs of active 3D glasses. The sets that use passive are pricier than active but the cost evens out nicely if you need 3-4 or more pairs of glasses.
Samsung Active Shutter Glasses £20/pair.
http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/samsung-ssg-3050gb-xc...

Mikey G

4,849 posts

262 months

Wednesday 28th December 2011
quotequote all
I'm swaying towards a Samsung unit, the new generation of panels look great and there is a version available to suit some kind of budget.

DeanR32

Original Poster:

1,840 posts

205 months

Thursday 29th December 2011
quotequote all
Thanks for the feedback.

I've been researching and seems Panasonic and Samsung do good tvs at the moment. I've seen em as cheap as 599 for certain 50" sets. Do I really need to up the budget for the next models up?

What is a good standard of tv? The last tv I bought (an LG at 1500 quid 5 years ago) was last years model only 2 months after I bought it so I'm not overly fussed about having the most up to date looking tv, although I don't want one looking straight out of the 90's!

What have you lot bought recently? Price and vendor too if possible

Cheers

mrmr96

13,736 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th December 2011
quotequote all
DeanR32 said:
Thanks for the feedback.

I've been researching and seems Panasonic and Samsung do good tvs at the moment. I've seen em as cheap as 599 for certain 50" sets. Do I really need to up the budget for the next models up?

What is a good standard of tv? The last tv I bought (an LG at 1500 quid 5 years ago) was last years model only 2 months after I bought it so I'm not overly fussed about having the most up to date looking tv, although I don't want one looking straight out of the 90's!

What have you lot bought recently? Price and vendor too if possible

Cheers
Bought this a couple of days ago: Samsung 51" 3D Plasma for £699 [inc 2 pairs active shutter glasses.]
(The 2 pairs of glasses are not "in the box" so you get them "free" as Comet have/had this as an offer. Apparently Currys have this offer too, but it's not advertised, but they matche the offer when I asked them about it.)
http://www.comet.co.uk/p/Plasma-TVs/buy-SAMSUNG-PS...

I can't see the free glasses on their website now, but I only bought it a couple of days ago, dunno how long that offer was for.

Anyway, pic:


Read a good review before I bought, and going Plasma allowed me to get a good size for the money (similar sized LCD's were up over £1k and I didn't have the budget for that.) Had it on the wall for a couple of days and pretty pleased with it so far to be honest. I upgraded from a 40in Samsung from a few years ago, and was concerend that the new one would look mental on the wall, but due to the fairly narrow border it actually doesn't take up too much more space than the old 40in, despite the screen being 51in as the overall tv isn't that much larger.

tdm34

7,478 posts

232 months

Thursday 29th December 2011
quotequote all
sjg said:
Personally, I'd be looking at passive 3D TVs if I was buying at all - most of the ones out there are LG models (look for "Cinema 3D" branding).

These use the same simple, cheap glasses as you use at the cinema, so you can have plenty of spares for when you have visitors and no worries about kids breaking £100+ pairs of active 3D glasses. The sets that use passive are pricier than active but the cost evens out nicely if you need 3-4 or more pairs of glasses.
Pros/cons Active vs Passive 3D

Pros for Active
Active is the only format that's actually 1080p when displaying 3D

Active Plasma sets have no viewing angle issues.

Generally better 3D effect

Cons for Active.
Sets are generally more expensive than Passive

Glasses are massively more expensive (but there are some great bundle deals out there)
But the costs are coming down quickly I expect you'll see universal Multi-Manufacturer
glasses to be at £25 or so before the end of 2012

Not everyone gets on with active, when I bought my VT20 last year I suffered a few headaches
but after a period of acclimatization I don't suffer this issue anymore.
also if there's any other light sources within you viewing arc they flicker, so active is
best watched in darkness.

Pros for Passive.

Cheaper initial costs with upto 7 sets of glasses bundled in the box.

No issues with flicker or headaches etc.

Cons for Passive

Not 1080p when viewing 3D

Can have issues at extreme viewing angles, also if you tilt your head relative to the screen
the 3D effect is reduced



mrmr96

13,736 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th December 2011
quotequote all
tdm34 said:
Cons for Active.
Glasses are massively more expensive
Like the £20 pair linked above?

tdm34

7,478 posts

232 months

Thursday 29th December 2011
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
tdm34 said:
Cons for Active.
Glasses are massively more expensive
Like the £20 pair linked above?
Bluetooth only and wont work with the older Samsung sets, also probably the poorest design
out there, you need to cut out any stray light for the best effect.

mrmr96

13,736 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th December 2011
quotequote all
Why is the design poor? You don't need to cut the light from the sides, only the light eminating from the tv set. Also, this desing easliy fits over my precription specs - so seems good from that point of view. Not very stylish though.

normalbloke

8,449 posts

241 months

Thursday 29th December 2011
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
Why is the design poor? You don't need to cut the light from the sides, only the light eminating from the tv set. Also, this desing easliy fits over my precription specs - so seems good from that point of view. Not very stylish though.
You were doing well right up until the last sentence. You"ll be sitting in a darkened room ffs!!

mrmr96

13,736 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th December 2011
quotequote all
normalbloke said:
mrmr96 said:
Why is the design poor? You don't need to cut the light from the sides, only the light eminating from the tv set. Also, this desing easliy fits over my precription specs - so seems good from that point of view. Not very stylish though.
You were doing well right up until the last sentence. You"ll be sitting in a darkened room ffs!!
lol - yeah there is that!!

tdm34

7,478 posts

232 months

Friday 30th December 2011
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
Why is the design poor? You don't need to cut the light from the sides, only the light eminating from the tv set. Also, this desing easliy fits over my precription specs - so seems good from that point of view. Not very stylish though.
It helps to have enclosed sides, especially if they are going over existing specs, as any stray light
causes reflections off the inner surfaces and it dilutes the 3D image.

Also those particular specs are very flimsy, and are easily damaged.

HIS LM

1,355 posts

281 months

Saturday 31st December 2011
quotequote all
How about this 3d set very good reviews and just had a demo in Tesco amazing picture quality also come with 7 pairs of specs !

http://www.amazon.co.uk/LG-47LW450U-47-inch-Widesc...

It seems a steal at this price as Tesco are asking £799


ChrisDT

1,902 posts

212 months

Sunday 1st January 2012
quotequote all
I'm swaying towards this one at the moment... http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/lg-50pz550t-50-full-h...

lee st

5,077 posts

187 months

Sunday 1st January 2012
quotequote all
50" panasonic gt. Best tv out there. Not just the best tv but actually won the best electronic product of the year. You will not find a better tv even if you go up 20x the price. This opinion is through owning one every electronics magazine countless Internet reviews and a mate of mine who's job it is to check new tech. Package deals are crazy at the moment too.

cheddar

4,637 posts

196 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
lee st said:
50" panasonic gt. Best tv out there. Not just the best tv but actually won the best electronic product of the year. You will not find a better tv even if you go up 20x the price. This opinion is through owning one every electronics magazine countless Internet reviews and a mate of mine who's job it is to check new tech. Package deals are crazy at the moment too.
Really?

Better than their daddy, the Panasonic VT50?

lee st

5,077 posts

187 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
cheddar said:
Really?

Better than their daddy, the Panasonic VT50?
Same panel, different spec. Obviously would of got the nod ahead of the gt but £££££££ not so great. Mate of mine had the last vt and took ages to setup 15 pages of setup menus where the gt is plug and go. All the upscaling and active/dynamic what not gives lots of sound issues if your running through an amp too.

Digger

16,082 posts

213 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
So as not to confuse people cheddar, you are referring to the 50" VT30? Other sizes are available. wink

HIS LM

1,355 posts

281 months

Monday 2nd January 2012
quotequote all
lee st said:
50" panasonic gt. Best tv out there. Not just the best tv but actually won the best electronic product of the year. You will not find a better tv even if you go up 20x the price. This opinion is through owning one every electronics magazine countless Internet reviews and a mate of mine who's job it is to check new tech. Package deals are crazy at the moment too.
Not that great according to the reviews on Amazon