Wall Mounting Floor Standers
Wall Mounting Floor Standers
Author
Discussion

Goa'uld

Original Poster:

661 posts

224 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
Essentially, wtf.

One of the younger guys in the office is looking for a house and came accross this photo on the particulars.



Is this as batsh#t insane as it looks? Surely the floor standers are meant to work from a solid base on the floor and have some room round them as well - this is suspended and pressed against the wall.

Is this mental?

toast boy

1,242 posts

248 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
I'm baffled by this. The only possible reason I can think of for doing this would be for aesthetic purposes but it looks utterly horrible. They should be firmly grounded on the floor with decent space around them, god only knows what that's doing for the sound?

Driller

8,310 posts

300 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
As long as they have forward firing bass ports it wouldn't be that awful (at least the sound, they look dreadful , a sort of hifi crucifixion).

What they should have done is soffit mount them as they do in studio control rooms to avoid all wall relections.

ETA Can't see any front bass ports!

Edited by Driller on Tuesday 21st February 17:11

Autopilot

1,333 posts

206 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
Call me old fashioned but I'm more than satisfied with the spikes I got with my floor standers and not once have I been tempted to get the No More Nails out!

Despite the obvious port issues (if the top holes aren't ports) but they must vibrate like hell.


Peter Griffin

101 posts

168 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
Goa'uld said:
Is this mental?
Yes!


danneth

1,083 posts

209 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
Sigh lol

Goa'uld

Original Poster:

661 posts

224 months

Tuesday 21st February 2012
quotequote all
He's looking for a new build detached house and I am really surprised by how small the livingrooms are, 3 and 4 bedroom places have living rooms that you could almost change the channel on the TV without using the remote!


Cheib

25,016 posts

197 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
That looks utter gash....and how the hell does the equipment not overheat in that hole in the wall?

Cheib

25,016 posts

197 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Goa'uld said:
He's looking for a new build detached house and I am really surprised by how small the livingrooms are, 3 and 4 bedroom places have living rooms that you could almost change the channel on the TV without using the remote!
Yeah my niece has just bought a place with her boyfriend....4 bedrooms, 4 bathrooms/bogs and tiny living space. People buy based on bedrooms and bogs it seems!

danyeates

7,248 posts

244 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Yep, they must be rear ported and would therefore sound kack! As above, the amp and Sky box would get bloody hot in there too!

Fatman2

1,464 posts

191 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
toast boy said:
I'm baffled by this.
Groan laugh

But I agree, possibly the most ridiculous thing I've heard in ages.

Crackie

6,386 posts

264 months

Thursday 23rd February 2012
quotequote all
Agreed they do look hideous but there is no reason why mounting them like this couldn't work well if, for example, they were mounted securely and they were a sealed rather than rear ported design. The speaker's designer should have taken boundary ( i.e the floor ) reinforcement into account during the speaker's development. When mounted in this position, low frequencies will receive similar boundary gain from the rear wall instead of the floor.

They are going sound poor (muted and dull) mounted this way though, certainly when the listener is sat watching TV. They would sound far better if they had been mounted the other way up; at least that way the tweeters would be vaguely on axis with the listener's ear height when sat down.

Edited by Crackie on Tuesday 28th February 12:55

trv8

311 posts

229 months

Saturday 25th February 2012
quotequote all
What a crap set-up!
Obviously not only got hearing problems, but also have eyesight problems aswell......
seen the size of the clock on the other wall biglaugh.

headcase

2,389 posts

239 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Id love to see the other side of the wall :P

TonyRPH

13,455 posts

190 months

Sunday 26th February 2012
quotequote all
Rear ported or not - there will be too much bass for a start.

I have a pair of Linn Keilidh floor standing speakers which are infinite baffle (e.g. no ports) and if you put those too close to the wall, the bass becomes excessive.

To work that close to a wall, the speaker has to be specially designed - Spendor actually designed a model that was intended to be wall mounted.

Floor standers are designed to be close coupled to the floor for optimum performance - and wall mounting them (even high up like above) will give lousy sound.

Also - they could have at least mounted these upside down to get the tweeters at ear level.

It's a case of 'never mind the quality, feel the bass' here.



Edited by TonyRPH on Sunday 26th February 19:44

page3

5,140 posts

273 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
Acoustic Energy did some excellent wall mounted speakers.

I bought their centre one, but they discontinued the range before I got round to ordering the rest!

TonyRPH

13,455 posts

190 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
Goa'uld said:
....
Stargate fan?

Crackie

6,386 posts

264 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
TonyRPH said:
Rear ported or not - there will be too much bass for a start.
There's no reason why there would be too much bass; the bass reinforcement is determined by the distances to adjacent boundaries. In this location the speaker will receive increased gain from the rear wall but there will be a big reduction from the floor.

TonyRPH said:
I have a pair of Linn Keilidh floor standing speakers which are infinite baffle (e.g. no ports) and if you put those too close to the wall, the bass becomes excessive.
You are doubling the boundary gain by putting your Linns close to the rear wall so excess bass (+6db) is likely with gain from floor and rear wall boundaries.

TonyRPH said:
Floor standers are designed to be close coupled to the floor for optimum performance
Certainly yes
TonyRPH said:
- and wall mounting them (even high up like above) will give lousy sound.
If a floorstanding speaker's path length from its bass driver to the floor is similar to the speaker's front to back depth, which it is in the picture above and probably wouldn't be too far off with Keilidhs, there is no acoustic reason for it to sound lousy when mounted on a wall.
Edited by Crackie on Tuesday 28th February 08:24

Goa'uld

Original Poster:

661 posts

224 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
TonyRPH said:
Goa'uld said:
....
Stargate fan?
Haha, yup.

andyroo

2,469 posts

232 months

Monday 5th March 2012
quotequote all
Those are Sony SSB4ED's and yes they have a port on the rear, and yes they will sound shocking like that. Why oh why would you ever want to wall mount a floorstander!?