WW2 Documentaries
Author
Discussion

kiteless

Original Poster:

12,597 posts

235 months

Saturday 14th April 2012
quotequote all
A freelance contract that ended in December last year, resulted in a nearly 5 month period of redundancy (which has now ended - yay for me) which saw me watching a number of WW2 documentaries on the Discovery and Yesterday channels. I found them all very interesting, but the stand-out was WWII in HD & Colour.

It featured great editing, a consistent timeline of events, coverage of some of the lesser known campaigns, and a narrative with the necessary gravitas from Robert Powell.

So, given that I have watched that series in its entirety, is it worth forking out for the complete series of The World At War narrated by Laurence Olivier in consideration that it is accepted to be one of the best WW2 documentaries ever broadcast?


lotus72

777 posts

297 months

Saturday 14th April 2012
quotequote all
I think it is.

Sheets Tabuer

21,538 posts

246 months

Saturday 14th April 2012
quotequote all
Yes absolutely.

henrycrun

2,473 posts

271 months

Saturday 14th April 2012
quotequote all
OT but the radio 4 Book of the Week 'Double Cross' was very interesting
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01fhrhx/Book... until Monday (5 episodes)

Written by Ben Macintyre.

A team of agents (codenames Bronx, Brutus, Treasure, Tricycle and Garbo) is recruited to work as part of the 'Double Cross System' run by the secret Twenty Committee.

D-Day, 6 June 1944, the turning point of the Second World War, was a victory of arms. But it was also a triumph for a different kind of operation: one of deceit, aimed at convincing the Nazis that Calais and Norway, not Normandy, were the targets of the 150,000-strong invasion force. The deception involved every branch of Allied wartime intelligence - the Bletchley Park code-breakers, MI5, MI6, SOE, Scientific Intelligence, the FBI and the French Resistance. But at its heart was the 'Double Cross System', a team of double agents controlled by the secret Twenty Committee, so named because twenty in Roman numerals forms a double cross.

The key D-Day spies were just five in number, and one of the oddest military units ever assembled: a bisexual Peruvian playgirl, a tiny Polish fighter pilot, a Serbian seducer, a wildly imaginative Spaniard with a diploma in chicken farming, and a hysterical Frenchwoman whose obsessive love for her pet dog very nearly wrecked the entire deception. Their enterprise was saved from catastrophe by a shadowy sixth spy whose heroic sacrifice is here revealed for the first time. Under the direction of an eccentric but brilliant intelligence officer in tartan trousers, working from a smoky lair in St James's, these spies would weave a web of deception so intricate that it ensnared Hitler's army and helped to carry thousands of troops across the Channel in safety.

These double agents were, variously, brave, treacherous, fickle, greedy and inspired. They were not conventional warriors, but their masterpiece of deceit saved countless lives. Their codenames were Bronx, Brutus, Treasure, Tricycle and Garbo. This is their story.

weyland yutani

1,410 posts

195 months

Saturday 14th April 2012
quotequote all
The Powell documentary was good but the "Colour and HD" bit was unimpressive, it looked terrible. Nat Geo had their own version out at about the same time, WW2 The Apocalypse which was also very good from a narrative point of view and the coloured-in technique looked marginally better too.

Soviet Storm currently running on Military is excellent too.

Edited by weyland yutani on Saturday 14th April 23:35

kiteless

Original Poster:

12,597 posts

235 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
I tried to "get" WW2 Apocalypse, but the narration was poor and jumped from theatre to theatre i.e. it spent five minutes describing the North African conflict, then went to describing the war for the North Atlantic and the U-Boats.


Eric Mc

125,917 posts

296 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
The World at W£ar still remains one of the greatest TV documentaries of all time. Elements of it seem dated now (especially the Dad's Army graphics) but it scores over modern documentaries in that it spoke to very important decision makers from all sides when they were still relatively young and articulate. The interviews were shot between 1971 and 1973.

Of course some revelatory mnaterial has been unearthed in the intervening decades, but the series still retains its relevance and power.

Mr_B

10,480 posts

274 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
If you want a really good series of WW2 Documentaries, then this series, The Secret War, based around the book Most Secret War by R V Jones ( the book is a must read )is great.
Looking at the scientific and intelligence war, it looks quite dated now, but simply full of detail that no one now days bothers with and features many of the men involved in key parts, such as Sir Tommy Flowers talking about the worlds first electronic computer used in decode German Enigma traffic.

There's 5 or 6 episodes, click the link to the first and then follow the rest from the sidebar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6SkWxL5FzE&fea...



Simpo Two

93,072 posts

296 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
Mr_B said:
it looks quite dated now, but simply full of detail that no one now days bothers with
It's notable how much more (proper) information goes into every minute - as opposed to series on Quest, History etc which, whilst still watchable, are desperately watered down.

kiteless

Original Poster:

12,597 posts

235 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The World at W£ar still remains one of the greatest TV documentaries of all time. Elements of it seem dated now (especially the Dad's Army graphics) but it scores over modern documentaries in that it spoke to very important decision makers from all sides when they were still relatively young and articulate. The interviews were shot between 1971 and 1973.

Of course some revelatory mnaterial has been unearthed in the intervening decades, but the series still retains its relevance and power.
Actually, one thing that was missing from WWII in Colour were interviews with people directly involved. I think that fact alone pretty much warrants investing in The World at War.

Simpo Two

93,072 posts

296 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
Though I think you have to be careful with interviews. There seems to be a school of thought that says all you need to do is film a few veterans talking to camera, then stick it together and call it a programme. Interviews are great, but you need a thread/storyline/overview too.

kiteless

Original Poster:

12,597 posts

235 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
Good point.

An excellent example of contextually apt interviews was another WW2 documentary I watched whilst "between jobs". Auschwitz: Nazis & The Final Solution was harrowing and absorbing in equal measure, and the interviewees had fascinating stories from the surviving prisoners, to members of the Sonderkommando, to SS members.

One interviewee, Oskar Gronig, was a young SS recruit who was in charge of cashflow in and out of the camp. Whilst not complicit in any of the mass murders, he was in charge of traffiking the valuables from the prisoners off the trains. During the series, he just stated facts; what he did and what he saw. It was only in the last instalment that he stated that the only reason he had accepted the offer to appear in the documentary was that he had heard so many tales and stories from Holocaust Deniers, that he should clearly state - as a SS member at the camp who saw the gas chambers, saw the crematoria, saw the piles of bodies - that these atrocities did really happen.

Eric Mc

125,917 posts

296 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
kiteless said:
Eric Mc said:
The World at W£ar still remains one of the greatest TV documentaries of all time. Elements of it seem dated now (especially the Dad's Army graphics) but it scores over modern documentaries in that it spoke to very important decision makers from all sides when they were still relatively young and articulate. The interviews were shot between 1971 and 1973.

Of course some revelatory mnaterial has been unearthed in the intervening decades, but the series still retains its relevance and power.
Actually, one thing that was missing from WWII in Colour were interviews with people directly involved. I think that fact alone pretty much warrants investing in The World at War.
After 1990 there aren't that many individuals around who had meaningful input into WW2 from a strategy and political decision making point of view. All the really imporatnt people had died. In TWAW, you have inteviews with -

Anthony Eden
Albert Speer
Squadron Leader Max Aitken
Jimmy Doolittle
The lady in charge of children evacuation from British cities
Churchill's personal secretary
Yamamoto's second in command
The US Secretary of State during WW2
Senior Russian Generals
Senior German Generals

and so on.

It was a last opportunity to get to these people and it is as well that the series was made when it was.

Smiler.

11,752 posts

261 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Sorry to hijack, I've been reading some excellent literature on the post war/cold war technologies - radar, ciphers etc.

Has anyone got any recommendations for documentaries or films?

I recently bought a rather shakey documentary about the V Bombers (on the back of that C4 one about the Falklands mission), I still enjoyed it.

Actually, I've still got the C4 3-parter on Sky+ somewhere.

Ta smile

kiteless

Original Poster:

12,597 posts

235 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
A relevant bump, this.

On the recommendations here, I asked mrs k for the full boxed set of TWAW for my birthday a couple of days ago. Now, it's not her thing watching WW2 docs, so I'm watching it on the PC at the mo; currently on Episode 2.

There have been a couple of "bloody hell" moments already.

There but for the grace of god was Churchill seated as PM in 1940, considering the good will towards Lord Halifax and Churchill's poor advice concerning the Norway campaign.

Also, and this was a grumpy moment, we sent 200,000 troops to Northern France in late 1939 / early 1940 to help out. Dig in. Just in case Hitler got moody. 200,000 men from this little island. During this, the French "allegedly" mobilised 6 million troops, and accused Blighty of "not taking the war seriously".

So far, so impressed with the narrative, the footage, and the interviews.

A very poignant start, also, alluding the destruction of Oradour Sur Glane as a physical metaphor for a world war.






weyland yutani

1,410 posts

195 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
The theme also sends shivers down my spine, powerful stuff.

longshot

3,286 posts

229 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
weyland yutani said:
The theme also sends shivers down my spine, powerful stuff.
Yes. The music from "The Nazis, A Warning From History" (awesome Docu series) has the same effect.

Eric Mc

125,917 posts

296 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Wait until you see the episode covering the Singapore debacle.

audidoody

8,598 posts

287 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
"D-Day to Berlin" is one of the best WW2 docs ever (in proper original Kodachrome)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0162344/

Eric Mc

125,917 posts

296 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Narrated by Robert Harris - who went on to become a best selling novellist.