The Space Shuttle that fell to Earth (BBC Documentary)
The Space Shuttle that fell to Earth (BBC Documentary)
Author
Discussion

cuprabob

Original Poster:

17,813 posts

235 months

Thursday 15th February 2024
quotequote all
It's a 3 part documentary on the Colombia disaster in 2003. It's very well done and well worth a watch on iPlayer.
Just be warned though some of the footage of the crew and their family made me feel a little uncomfortable, knowing their fate.

Deckert

646 posts

211 months

Thursday 15th February 2024
quotequote all
An excellent documentary made by the BBC, i've only watched the first episode yet.

PinkTornado

1,814 posts

83 months

Thursday 15th February 2024
quotequote all
Agreed, an absolutely superb if sobering piece of television.

Nethybridge

1,146 posts

33 months

Thursday 15th February 2024
quotequote all
It'll be a tough view in parts, true heroes.

rjfp1962

9,019 posts

94 months

Thursday 15th February 2024
quotequote all
Watched Ep.1 and finding it very informative so far, and worth watching..

WPA

13,303 posts

135 months

Thursday 15th February 2024
quotequote all
PinkTornado said:
Agreed, an absolutely superb if sobering piece of television.
+1, hard to watch in places

SpudLink

7,547 posts

213 months

Saturday 17th February 2024
quotequote all
Just finished this. Very well done. Very moving.
Reminded me of the Piper Alpha documentary that is also on the iPlayer. That one had me in tears.

Deerfoot

5,143 posts

205 months

Sunday 18th February 2024
quotequote all
Just finished this.

I was absolutely amazed at the culture that was evident in NASA at the time, any engineer should've been able to voice concerns to management. Dreadful.

The footage of the foam experiment was eye opening too, quite why the possibility of damage hadn't been explored from the main tank insulation hitting the shuttle after previous incidents was short sighted.

Eric Mc

124,658 posts

286 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
Ther culture at NASA was no different to the culture you see in so many organisations - whether that be Boeing, the Post Office, the NHS etc. Nobody wants to speak out for fear of upsetting the applecart and suffering professionally.

The shocking thing as far as NASA was concerned was that the lessons that SHOULD have been learned from the Challenger accident seemed to have been forgotten very, very quickly.


rider73

4,374 posts

98 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Ther culture at NASA was no different to the culture you see in so many organisations - whether that be Boeing, the Post Office, the NHS etc. Nobody wants to speak out for fear of upsetting the applecart and suffering professionally.

The shocking thing as far as NASA was concerned was that the lessons that SHOULD have been learned from the Challenger accident seemed to have been forgotten very, very quickly.
this.

i have not seen this documentary though , its on my list to watch...but theres been many in the past on this tragedy ....


Mercdriver

3,000 posts

54 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
But one man had the balls to resign before the launch, stating he thought it unsafe to launch in the cold temperatures because the o rings were not specified to seal in the low temperatures. Sorry cannot remember his name maybe bojeley?

He saw what could happen and resigned so was not held liable, quite rightly.

Maybe needed someone like him in the PO, it takes one with the right stuff

SpudLink

7,547 posts

213 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
Mercdriver said:
But one man had the balls to resign before the launch, stating he thought it unsafe to launch in the cold temperatures because the o rings were not specified to seal in the low temperatures. Sorry cannot remember his name maybe bojeley?

He saw what could happen and resigned so was not held liable, quite rightly.

Maybe needed someone like him in the PO, it takes one with the right stuff
The O ring issue was the first shuttle disaster, Challenger.

I got the impression NASA was being run on similar lines to the military. Clearly it just wasn't acceptable to go outside the chain of command. To us, watching from the outside and with hindsight, it seems obvious the smartest engineers on the planet should all be allowed to raise their concerns.

Mercdriver

3,000 posts

54 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
You are right, memory not so good these days but I think the guy who resigned was not in the military he was engineer for the booster program.

Having said that you can understand why nasa was run on military lines, made sense at the time I guess

jgrewal

987 posts

68 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
This was a very tough watch but well very made so kudos to the BBC. It made me feel sad that NASA has this type of culture and hopefully it is completely eradicated now. The challenger doc (the o-rings as mentioned above) is on Netflix is also very sad viewing because they had such high hope for that mission by sending a civilian teacher into space. The space shuttle is an iconic feat of engineering and really was ahead of its time when it was visioned as a space vehicle that would mean travel would become easier and cost effective.

Miocene

1,572 posts

178 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
Excellent program, if very sobering as mentioned.

FWIW it was made by Louis Theoroux's production company, who clearly knows a thing or two about documentaries!

Eric Mc

124,658 posts

286 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
Mercdriver said:
You are right, memory not so good these days but I think the guy who resigned was not in the military he was engineer for the booster program.

Having said that you can understand why nasa was run on military lines, made sense at the time I guess
As far as I am aware, nobody actually resigned before the launch of Challenger. A number of Thiokol managers recommended that the Shuttle should not launch because of the low temperatures. Initially, the management at Thiokol agreed with their engineers but, under pressure from NASA, changed their mind and then agreed that the launch should go ahead. The Thiokol management technically over ruled their own engineers. ONE of the Thiokol, managers, Alan McDonald, refused to sign off on the launch decsion as he disagreed with it fundamentally and his immediate boss did the signing instead. He said it was the smartest thing he ever did in his life - even though he displeased his employer immensely.

Far from resigning, McDonald stayed with Thiokol until he retired.

smn159

14,843 posts

238 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
Alan McDonalds book, Truth, Lies and O Rings, is well worth a read if anyone hasn't done so

Mercdriver

3,000 posts

54 months

tinhead

125 posts

253 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
Only watched the first episode but as others have said its very sobering viewing knowing the outcome, especially with all the behind the scenes footage from one of the crew.
I may be wrong in this assumption but given how much of the training is in simulators/ underwater etc, I got the impression when they were entering the shuttle it was the first time they'd actually seen it first hand, and if they seen how old and tired it looked by then, was it over 20 missions, they may have had second thoughts. A couple of them did appear really nervous (understandably) on the launch pad and I reckon if they had the option of backing out there and then without any consequences they may have done so.

cuprabob

Original Poster:

17,813 posts

235 months

Monday 19th February 2024
quotequote all
tinhead said:
I got the impression when they were entering the shuttle it was the first time they'd actually seen it first hand, and if they seen how old and tired it looked by then, was it over 20 missions
Yes, I believe this was its 28th.