The Hurt Locker (with spoilers)
The Hurt Locker (with spoilers)
Author
Discussion

corporalsparrow

Original Poster:

403 posts

203 months

Monday 31st August 2009
quotequote all
Saw this last night...brilliant. Very authentic and tense depiction of bomb disposal in Iraq. Dark and unpredictable, uncomfortable viewing in places. One gripe; the US bomb disposal team come across a (presumably) SAS unit in the desert, who are promptly decimated by an insurgent sniper, whilst the yanks go on to save the day without loss to themselves....yeah right. Other than that 9 out of 10. One of the best films of the year I'd say.

Alex_S

75 posts

241 months

Monday 31st August 2009
quotequote all
I think the Brits were meant to be contractors rather than UKSF.

Cotty

41,874 posts

307 months

Monday 31st August 2009
quotequote all
It does look good from the reviews I have read. Looking forward to seeing it.

bridgdav

4,805 posts

271 months

Monday 31st August 2009
quotequote all
After reading the rave reviews... I saw it last night. Hmmmm

(SPOILER ALERT)

IMO - Not worth all the hype. Bomb disposal and those that do it should be held in utmost respect, life on line and all that. Why was it that the characters in this film had very little charisma, no real substance. Bomb boy was a bit of a knob if you ask me. Realistic - a word that has been associated with The Hurt Locker. I thought some of the scripting was so far fetched it was laughable. The boy Beckham, going out the camp to his house, no relationship building, unprofessional and risky working. Too much Bravado and not enough feeling - I couldn't feel for Bomb boy, his pain and hurt - missing the street..

aspender

1,403 posts

288 months

Thursday 3rd September 2009
quotequote all
Saw it tonight. Good film, and one of the best recent war movies, but plagued by a number of inaccuracies that you couldn't help notice (Spoliers ahead):


















- The EOD team never go out with any accompaniment, they just seem to operate entirely on their own. I doubt that would happen, aren't they meant to be attached to particular units?
- No CO at all? Maybe the Colonel "Doc" was, but that wasn't clear. I'd have thought that there would be an officer within each team, or at least commanding them on the radio?
- The clearance of the bomb factory - again they wouldn't be doing that, they'd go in after it was cleared
- The iPod Touch didn't exist in 2004
- YouTube didn't exist in 2004
- Blood wouldn't cause an M82 to jam
- They loaded a single round into the M82 manually, shot it, you never saw or heard the mag get attached, then another shot, then a 3rd, then a view of the gun with mag attached.

MrV

2,748 posts

251 months

Thursday 3rd September 2009
quotequote all
I enjoyed the film ,but took it for what it was and that is entertainment smile

Its worth reading Eight lives down if you want a truer image of the bomb disposal guys out in Iraq

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Eight-Lives-Down-Chris-Hun...

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

251 months

Friday 4th September 2009
quotequote all
MrV said:
I enjoyed the film ,but took it for what it was and that is entertainment smile

Its worth reading Eight lives down if you want a truer image of the bomb disposal guys out in Iraq

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Eight-Lives-Down-Chris-Hun...
Read that book when it came out and thought of it when I saw this film advertised the other night. Want to go and see this tonight hopefully. Not sure whether my missus will be interested but if we go and see something else too she may sit through this lol!

Interesting comments above re the depiction of forces from other countries. The USA always save the day in their films lol!

okgo

41,515 posts

221 months

Sunday 6th September 2009
quotequote all
Quite over rated imo.

And I agree with much of the above.

I didn't feel for any of the characters, and there wasn't any real story to it.. It just went on, and that was kinda it..

BruceV8

3,325 posts

270 months

Sunday 6th September 2009
quotequote all
I can't bring myself to watch it - I know I'll hate it. But some of my lads did go to see it. They said it was st.

Not Ideal

3,018 posts

211 months

Monday 7th September 2009
quotequote all
I quite enjoyed it!

Spoiler Alert:

I thought the Sniper scene was very good and genuinely felt some tension if some of the other set pieces...especially with the suicide bomber.

Hard to believe it was directed by a 55 year old woman who also directed Point Break of all movies.

Negative Creep

25,801 posts

250 months

Thursday 24th September 2009
quotequote all
Bump! Saw this last night and it's the first film in quite a while that had me completely hooked. If you haven't seen this yet, then do so!

adycav

7,615 posts

240 months

Thursday 24th September 2009
quotequote all
I enjoyed it too - it's gripping, claustrophobic, powerful stuff.

Caruso

7,505 posts

279 months

Wednesday 30th September 2009
quotequote all
Saw it the other night. It's right up there in terms of good Gulf War II movies, but I think that's as much to do with the lack of decent ones. Compared to other war films though, it's only slightly above average. So worth seeing, but not as good as some of the hype might lead you to believe.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

251 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Finally got round to watching this last night (last post on this was September last year, blimey!).

I enjoyed it but, as has been pointed out above, there did seem to be some oddities to this film.


spoilers-----------------

Sniper scene did annoy me a little in the sense that it made English mercs/operators seem really stupid. Also wondered how the enemy (probably with a Dragunov) managed to shoot the English chap on the Barrett, but then go on to miss the American chap who took over it. Also made me laugh when the chap was spotting for the Barrett sniper, he mentioned at one point that someone was out of range? The range on that rifle is monstrous!

Blood on bullets, odd. I also noticed the single round he loaded into the Barrett but then he went on to fire a few more off. And, I don't understand why the English chap on the Barrett missed so bad then just sat there arsing around with the rifle. Odd.

That scene did give a sense of tension though which was good. Although I did find it annoying that the Americans once again saved the day! 'They shot Chris'! ha ha smile.

Also, the EOD team moved in a team of three, with two chaps covering the ATO. That seemed odd as the book I have read about the British ATO (eight lives down) states there are cordons and other team members around.

Oh well, it was a good film, I'm just reading too much into it. I like the end bit though where you get the feeling that the ATO cannot really adjust to civilan life.

Oakey

27,969 posts

239 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Hands up all those that realised the English guy on the Barrett was Ralph Fiennes...

No me neither.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

251 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
Oakey said:
Hands up all those that realised the English guy on the Barrett was Ralph Fiennes...

No me neither.
Yep. Whoops, sorry smile.

I also noticed that one of the surviving English chaps was actually Dr Jekyll out of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen? Or have I got that wrong? smile

okgo

41,515 posts

221 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
The black guy is also the final member of the rap gang that battle eminem in 8 mile, too.

Northern Munkee

5,354 posts

223 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
funkyrobot said:
Oakey said:
Hands up all those that realised the English guy on the Barrett was Ralph Fiennes...

No me neither.
Yep. Whoops, sorry smile.

I also noticed that one of the surviving English chaps was actually Dr Jekyll out of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen? Or have I got that wrong? smile
Wrong I'm afraid, Dr Jekyll was played by Jason Flemyng. He's not in it. But I know the one you mean.

And because yes I can look stuff up on the internet too.

The Contractors, apart from Fiennes, were Sam Spruell, Sam Redford, Feisal Sadoun, Barrie Rice. And know I don't know which one it is.

Tiggsy

10,261 posts

275 months

Monday 25th January 2010
quotequote all
You guys think too much....blood on bullets, range of the gun - joe blogs doesnt know or care. As for the English guy getting hit...maybe he was rubbish? He wasnt SAS they were Mercs...maye he was just a dufus - and the bomb guy wasnt.

Frankeh

12,558 posts

208 months

Tuesday 26th January 2010
quotequote all
They were mercs, it's understandable that they weren't pros.
One bit had me in fits "We used up our wrench"..