9 out 18.5 cats agree
Discussion
In the good old days, statistics produced to sell a product comprised
8 out of 10 cats prefer....
or "in a survey of 100 women 18 percent agreed this shampoo was the best"
so why lately are apparently random numbers of people questioned 35 out of 141 people asked, said they preffered this skin product
confused....
8 out of 10 cats prefer....
or "in a survey of 100 women 18 percent agreed this shampoo was the best"
so why lately are apparently random numbers of people questioned 35 out of 141 people asked, said they preffered this skin product
confused....
The weirdest one was for a butter last year where upon reading the stats at the bottom you'd be more likely to either like the other product or not be fussed than prefer it but because it was slightly more popular than the comparison product on it's own they made a big fuss about it being the best.
agric said:
cant be that simple,
they'd just rephrase the questions and poll another few hundred surely?
No I was thinking it was some statistical formula to somehow massage an otherwise dull outcome
15% out of 100 people hated it. Keep asking and asking until the figures rise and come to the answerthey'd just rephrase the questions and poll another few hundred surely?
No I was thinking it was some statistical formula to somehow massage an otherwise dull outcome
27% out of 1023 people loved our product.
Added: Much worse are cosmetic products that sell 10,000 products a year and yet they ask less than 100 people and STILL come out with lowish figures.
Edited by Morningside on Tuesday 23 February 22:11
depends if it's a scientific study, a survey or just an indication of how many people feel a particular way.
Scientific study will usually end up being out of a non-round number (eg 141), due to number of people who respond, or due to people in the study group being discounted/dropping out for various reasons.
A general survey can just literally ask 100 people, and wouldn't need to discount anyone.
If it's just a stat used to give an indication, then I guess the number will usually be used as a ratio or percentage, rather than quoting the actual raw figures.
Scientific study will usually end up being out of a non-round number (eg 141), due to number of people who respond, or due to people in the study group being discounted/dropping out for various reasons.
A general survey can just literally ask 100 people, and wouldn't need to discount anyone.
If it's just a stat used to give an indication, then I guess the number will usually be used as a ratio or percentage, rather than quoting the actual raw figures.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



