What the "Green" Movement got wrong.
Discussion
JB! said:
So far all this has done has made me hate environMENTALists more, they are at least partly to blame for:
Slowed development of Neuclear Power
Increase in use of Coal for power generation
Increase in cases of Malaria due to protesting against DDT
Me too - and I didn't think that possible! - so, result!Slowed development of Neuclear Power
Increase in use of Coal for power generation
Increase in cases of Malaria due to protesting against DDT
Nice to see the greenpiss demonisers getting some over due blame for their anti-science, anti-human interference.
JB! said:
So far all this has done has made me hate environMENTALists more, they are at least partly to blame for:
Slowed development of Neuclear Power
Increase in use of Coal for power generation
Increase in cases of Malaria due to protesting against DDT
And how many millions of deaths due to malnutrition now...Slowed development of Neuclear Power
Increase in use of Coal for power generation
Increase in cases of Malaria due to protesting against DDT
I can forgive the program a little bit of pro-mmcc because it's fair laying into them in other ways.
The irony and hypocrisy tabled in the programme was nauseating.
One one hand we have the environmentalists lobbying against, and subsequently halting, the creation of clean energy (nuclear), thus being the catalyst for more coal fired power stations which play a large part of the atmospheric CO2 they are so very bloody concerned about (for some reason or another).
On the other, we have two greenies (admittedly on the "Green Thinking Must Change" side of the fence), one of which seems to have a very large, very nice pile in the country which no doubt has substantial running costs, the other pedalling a Land Rover Freelander. Both stating that their stance on previously anathema issues to environmentalists has been changed by examining the "science" and the "data".
If that is the case, then why be so convinced that MMGW is such a reality when so many scientists and so much data suggests that MMGW isn't actually proven (and, yes, I have read every page of the two main climate threads in NP&E).
One one hand we have the environmentalists lobbying against, and subsequently halting, the creation of clean energy (nuclear), thus being the catalyst for more coal fired power stations which play a large part of the atmospheric CO2 they are so very bloody concerned about (for some reason or another).
On the other, we have two greenies (admittedly on the "Green Thinking Must Change" side of the fence), one of which seems to have a very large, very nice pile in the country which no doubt has substantial running costs, the other pedalling a Land Rover Freelander. Both stating that their stance on previously anathema issues to environmentalists has been changed by examining the "science" and the "data".
If that is the case, then why be so convinced that MMGW is such a reality when so many scientists and so much data suggests that MMGW isn't actually proven (and, yes, I have read every page of the two main climate threads in NP&E).
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




king moonbat is on it...what a shock.