A Global Warming statement
Author
Discussion

Variomatic

Original Poster:

2,392 posts

190 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
If the world warms, it's down to man burning fossil fuels.

If the world doesn't warm, it's down to Man burning fossil fuels:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-1400...

No doubt if, over the next decade or two, the world cools, it will be down to Man burning fossil fuels. :roll: :roll: :roll:

For future generations, when you look back and laugh at how foolish / gullible / just plain stupid, we were believing this crap I want to state now that:

I, Variomatic, was NOT one of the idiots and don't believe a single word of it!

Feel free to add your name to the list if you don't want the future to label you along with the eejuts*







  • Obviously, PH will last forever so this will become a true historic record wink

djmotorsport

479 posts

272 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
MMGW - A load of tosh!

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

186 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Surely if burning fossil fuels raises the temperature, evetually we won't need to burn as much because it's warmer and then the temperature will drop again?

Reminds me of acid rain in the nineties - rainforest the size of Wales cut down every day yada yada, by 2005 we'll have to wear gas masks to go shopping yada yada, crops will only grow indoors yada yada.

The truth - governments fund ideas that allow them to increase taxes. Scientists go where the money is. End of.

XJSsometimeSoon

378 posts

188 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
These daft short term studies really piss me off. Climate change is happening and always has, our climate has never been stable its a highly dynamic system. I have no doubt that humans are influencing climate change, but we certainly are not causing it. A ten year time frame is not an indication of climate at all. typical Arm waving, headline grabbing bullst from PNAS

Mr Gear

9,416 posts

219 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
Surely if burning fossil fuels raises the temperature, evetually we won't need to burn as much because it's warmer and then the temperature will drop again?

Reminds me of acid rain in the nineties - rainforest the size of Wales cut down every day yada yada, by 2005 we'll have to wear gas masks to go shopping yada yada, crops will only grow indoors yada yada.

The truth - governments fund ideas that allow them to increase taxes. Scientists go where the money is. End of.
Go read up on acid rain. Educate yourself.

Sam1990

398 posts

196 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
The only trouble is, they've really got us by the bks on this one. The government can easily justify the high costs of running a car with all this rubbish, in the do-gooder's views it is reducing the amount we all use our cars which to them is only a good thing, meaning people support the actions and the costs continue to rise. Everyone's a winner, apart from the innocent motorists.

alock

4,559 posts

240 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Only one graph matters:


Anyone who believes our pathetically small output of CO2 will harm the planet is deluded.

HD Adam

5,155 posts

213 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Yes, Global Warming. It causes cooling. And warming.

Mind you, then there's sunspots. Cool & warm. All at the same time. What about the weather, eh? All that drought and rain.

I'm in. Or out. Whichever one it is, I'll happily pay more tax for all those windmills and fluffy bunnies.

Won't somebody think of the children Polar Bears.

FFS silly

alsem

580 posts

219 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
The oil is going to be burnt up anyway, whithin 1000 years, about all the oil is on the surface of the earth as a product or burnt up, so if you don't enjoy burning up the oil, the next generations will.
That's one of my purposes in life, enjoy burning up oil by driving big and fast cars before somebody else does!

V88Dicky

7,367 posts

212 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
This'll get moved.


But yes, it is bks.

XJSsometimeSoon

378 posts

188 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
alock said:
Only one graph matters:


Anyone who believes our pathetically small output of CO2 will harm the planet is deluded.
I totally agree, I study the climate from the Carboniferous through to the Jurassic as part of my PhD. CO2 levels were whole orders of magnitude higher than present. the only agruments are that the rate of release is very high and we don't have the same carbon sinks as back then, however we are far from fked.

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

186 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Mr Gear said:
Caulkhead said:
Surely if burning fossil fuels raises the temperature, evetually we won't need to burn as much because it's warmer and then the temperature will drop again?

Reminds me of acid rain in the nineties - rainforest the size of Wales cut down every day yada yada, by 2005 we'll have to wear gas masks to go shopping yada yada, crops will only grow indoors yada yada.

The truth - governments fund ideas that allow them to increase taxes. Scientists go where the money is. End of.
Go read up on acid rain. Educate yourself.
Try reading my post and then get back to me. I make no value judgements about acid rain, I simply quote three phrases which were continually repeated by the media at the time until everyone got sick of the topic.

Carfiend

3,186 posts

238 months

Tuesday 5th July 2011
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
Surely if burning fossil fuels raises the temperature, evetually we won't need to burn as much because it's warmer and then the temperature will drop again?
I like this one, it is flame bait enough to get the backs up on some greenies but also makes some sense so cannot be put down easily.