Cancer cured with the good AIDS
Cancer cured with the good AIDS
Author
Discussion

Oakey

Original Poster:

27,984 posts

246 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all
Well, 'harmless' HIV anyway;

Article said:
Doctors have treated only three leukemia patients, but the sensational results from a single shot could be one of the most significant advances in cancer research in decades. And it almost never happened

In the research published Wednesday, doctors at the University of Pennsylvania say the treatment made the most common type of leukemia completely disappear in two of the patients and reduced it by 70 percent in the third. In each of the patients as much as five pounds of cancerous tissue completely melted away in a few weeks, and a year later it is still gone.

The results of the preliminary test “exceeded our wildest expectations,” says immunologist Dr. Carl June a member of the Abramson Cancer Center's research team.

Dr. Edgar Engleman, a cancer immunologist at Stanford University School of Medicine who was not involved in the research calls the results “remarkable ... great stuff.”

The Penn scientists targeted chroniclymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the most common type of the blood disease. It strikes some 15,000 people in the United States, mostly adults, and kills 4,300 every year. Chemotherapy and radiation can hold this form of leukemia at bay for years, but until now the only cure has been a bone marrow transplant. A bone marrow transplant requires a suitable match, works only about half the time, and often brings on severe, life-threatening side effects such as pain and infection.

In the Penn experiment, the researchers removed certain types of white blood cells that the body uses to fight disease from the patients. Using a modified, harmless version of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, they inserted a series of genes into the white blood cells. These were designed to make to cells target and kill the cancer cells. After growing a large batch of the genetically engineered white blood cells, the doctors injected them back into the patients.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44090512/

Pesty

42,655 posts

286 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all
Wow, good stuff

RemainAllHoof

80,144 posts

312 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all
Strange. Not sure how I'd feel if the doc said what they were gonna do!

Oakey

Original Poster:

27,984 posts

246 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all
RemainAllHoof said:
Strange. Not sure how I'd feel if the doc said what they were gonna do!
I read that the survival rate for 'bad' HIV was 24 years from infection. Not that it matters, as this is 'harmless' HIV

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

261 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all
This is wonderful.....(tinfoil hat mode on).....Unless the Pharma-giants feel threatened and thwart things. (tinfoil hat mode off).....Very promising stuff. smile



Edited by Jimbeaux on Friday 12th August 01:08

Mr Happy

5,898 posts

250 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all
The march of science never fails to impress me.

The person who thought of using a 'neutered' version of a frankly terrifying disease, to annihilate another equally terrifying disease/condition (whatever you would call cancer), and who was able to ensure it happened needs a medal.

Genuinely impressed with that story.

westtra

1,542 posts

231 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all

westtra

1,542 posts

231 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all

jbi

12,700 posts

234 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all
As someone who's father suffers from a form of non-hodgkins lymphoma and will need chemotherapy for the rest of his life... this is fantastic news to me.

Now I only hope this isn't a red herring and the process receives the proper investment and support it clearly needs.

Flat_Steve

1,535 posts

277 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all
Could be a game changer, looks like they'll get to properly test and develop it now at least. Great news!

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

292 months

Thursday 11th August 2011
quotequote all
Astounding news.

Blib

48,260 posts

227 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
jbi said:
As someone who's father suffers from a form of non-hodgkins lymphoma and will need chemotherapy for the rest of his life... this is fantastic news to me.

Now I only hope this isn't a red herring and the process receives the proper investment and support it clearly needs.
My BiL who is suffering from o form of Non-Hodgkins is in the middle of chemo treatment before his stem cell transplant. Good luck to your father.

thumbup

g3org3y

22,509 posts

221 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
Not as effective as homeopathy.

Pommygranite

14,472 posts

246 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
g3org3y said:
Not as effective as homeopathy.
Strange comment given homeopathy has been around for hundreds of years and it hasnt achieved what this news report claims which in turn leads me to question how you can claim a new 'solution' is less effective?

Mr Sparkle

1,936 posts

200 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
g3org3y said:
Not as effective as homeopathy.
...at making money.
...at scamming people.
...at convincing people to abandon more effective medicine.

0a

24,159 posts

224 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
Blimey...

Pints

18,451 posts

224 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
I made a similar suggestion to one of my school teachers back in the late 80s/early 90s. He dismissed the idea saying it would never work.
The barsteward! I could have been more famous than Graham.

wolves_wanderer

12,958 posts

267 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
Pints said:
I made a similar suggestion to one of my school teachers back in the late 80s/early 90s. He dismissed the idea saying it would never work.
The barsteward! I could have been more famous than Graham.
Better hope it's not your teacher who's working on this, he might collect your Nobel prize in a couple of years...

anonymous-user

84 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
Oakey said:
I read that the survival rate for 'bad' HIV was 24 years from infection. Not that it matters, as this is 'harmless' HIV
I was surprised (understatement) to read year or so ago that with the right drugs HIV is a chronic non life threatening condition, much like diabetes.

Huge advances.

boobles

15,251 posts

245 months

Friday 12th August 2011
quotequote all
So they inject you with "HIV" which then cures you from cancer?