Moron v Moron
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
Tea Party whack job turned author Christine O'Donnell gets upset when CNN talk show host and former disgraced newspaper editor Piers "Moron" Morgan has the audacity to ask her a question that she hadn't prepared for. Why anyone would want to read a book by the whacky witch is anyone's guess...


http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/08/18/od...

ProSc2008

196 posts

267 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
Article said:
O'Donnell made national headlines in 2010 when she denied in a TV ad that she was a witch, responding to comments she made a decade earlier on a TV show saying she had "dabbled in witchcraft."
rofl

Which century are we living in again?

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
ProSc2008 said:
Article said:
O'Donnell made national headlines in 2010 when she denied in a TV ad that she was a witch, responding to comments she made a decade earlier on a TV show saying she had "dabbled in witchcraft."
rofl

Which century are we living in again?
She's a leading light of the so called Tea Party! Witchcraft is nothing to those nutters.

DJRC

23,563 posts

266 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
How are they nutters? This always confuses me. Whenever phs talks about them its always Palin, Bachman and CoD, yet whenever I see a BBC story about them, despite the BBC being allegedly the left hand of Stalin, it always runs pictures and stories of "grass roots folks", normal middle-America types and placards with nothing so radical as "Washington Stop Spending". So according to ph the BBC should be showing them as raving nutters and they should only be raving nutters, except the only time I hear of them being raving nutters is when Im told they are raving nutters by some ph'ers.

The only thing I can see from looking around that is vaguely nutty about them is a few high profile ones believe in God. Is that really the sum total of their nuttyness or am I missing something? Its a bit, well, dull if it is. I mean, we at least have had Duck Houses, Moat clearing and hotel porn to get excited about from our nutters. Far as I can work out, the Tea party mob are about as radical as a Church of England vicar.

Apache

39,731 posts

314 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
I'm beginning to see the Tea Party as a bit more level headed than Obarmy to be honest

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
The words "Tea Party" and "level headed" in the same sentence???

About as likely as "Tony Blair" and "integrity".

Y282

20,566 posts

202 months

Thursday 18th August 2011
quotequote all
DJRC said:
How are they nutters? This always confuses me. Whenever phs talks about them its always Palin, Bachman and CoD, yet whenever I see a BBC story about them, despite the BBC being allegedly the left hand of Stalin, it always runs pictures and stories of "grass roots folks", normal middle-America types and placards with nothing so radical as "Washington Stop Spending". So according to ph the BBC should be showing them as raving nutters and they should only be raving nutters, except the only time I hear of them being raving nutters is when Im told they are raving nutters by some ph'ers.

The only thing I can see from looking around that is vaguely nutty about them is a few high profile ones believe in God. Is that really the sum total of their nuttyness or am I missing something? Its a bit, well, dull if it is. I mean, we at least have had Duck Houses, Moat clearing and hotel porn to get excited about from our nutters. Far as I can work out, the Tea party mob are about as radical as a Church of England vicar.
have you read bachmann's thoughts on alternative lifestyles?