6 year sentence over £500 bribe for Court Administrator
Discussion
You may recall the case of Munir Patel who was filmed by a newspaper accepting a £500 bribe to avoid putting details of a minor motoring offence onto the Court database.
He has been sentenced to 6 years in prison.
Wow. That is a lot of time for a little money.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-156898...
As they said in Grange Hill; Just say "no".
He has been sentenced to 6 years in prison.
Wow. That is a lot of time for a little money.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-156898...
As they said in Grange Hill; Just say "no".
mgtony said:
That's not "a little money" if you multiply it by at least the 50 people they know of that he done it for! 
Yes, apologies for the Daily Wailesque simplification. Assuming his rate was consistently £500 a pop and genuinely only 50 cases exist that is still a lot of time for what he probably considered a little bit of dodging. I'm not defending his actions at all, I was commenting that the sentence sounds steep. Especially so in comparison to other sentences one reads. Let's hope others in positions of privilege have a good long think.
MX7 said:
I don't think that's a harsh sentence. He's employed to record public offences, but instead used his position to line his own pockets.
AgreedWe would expect court officers to uphold the highest standards of honesty. A sentence such as this is justified by its deterrant value alone.
... which raises a number of questions, not least of which is why was it allowed to go on for so long before being stopped? Will there be a process to recover the ill-gotten gains, or will he become another dodgy-looking guy with a flash motor and no apparent means of paying for it?
He only offered the 'favour' for others of his type. Funny how those groups who are quickest to point the finger of racism are so often the most guilty.
Oli.
He only offered the 'favour' for others of his type. Funny how those groups who are quickest to point the finger of racism are so often the most guilty.
Oli.
anonymous said:
[redacted]
This.It's got zero to do with the amount of money, and everything to do with the fact that he abused a position of trust.
He also only did it for those of his "commoon-ity innit".
Bang on sentence. Dirty corrupt little scumbag. He'll suffer in prison.
Edited by Soovy on Friday 18th November 14:18
Ozzie Osmond said:
In which case there should be a lot more MPs in jail over their expenses thefts! The principle is right, though.
I'm not going to defend the MPs guilty of expenses fraud, but is there any suggestion that any of them manipulated our justice system to profiteer? anonymous said:
[redacted]
So downplayed that I can't find any mention of it anywhere. Where did you see it?Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


