The Social Underclass

[Happy82]

What's the point of them? They contribute nothing, drag down standards in schools, cost fking billions to keep in a better lifestyle than those working....

Would anyone miss them if we simply eradicated them one evening?

[martin84]

Bored this Sunday are we?

[Happy82]

Yep, and thinking of ways to reduce the defecit

[crankedup]

Best keep quite Jeremy, you've already stirred quite enough for one week.

[ringram]

Happy82 said:

What's the point of them? They contribute nothing, drag down standards in schools, cost fking billions to keep in a better lifestyle than those working....

Would anyone miss them if we simply eradicated them one evening?

They are thick enough to buy the st you sell and services you offer. If it wernt for them being so gullible you would have to work harder for a living...

[98elise]

The scary thing is they breed faster than working people.

I would say that half the people I work with are mid to late 30's with no kids, they simply can't afford to take time out of work and breed yet.

[Codswallop]

98elise said:

The scary thing is they breed faster than working people.

Like rats they is.

[martin84]

When you have no work to do you have time to stay at home and fk your council estate slag. Be honest, theres a part of you which is slightly jealous.

[Fort Jefferson]

Happy82 said:

What's the point of them? They contribute nothing, drag down standards in schools, cost fking billions to keep in a better lifestyle than those working....

Would anyone miss them if we simply eradicated them one evening?

No, where do we sign up?

[Jimslips]

crankedup said:

Best keep quite Jeremy, you've already stirred quite enough for one week.

Quite what?

[mattley]

ringram said:

They are thick enough to buy the st you sell and services you offer.

The problem here is that they're not.

[Deva Link]

ringram said:

They are thick enough to buy the st you sell and services you offer. If it wernt for them being so gullible you would have to work harder for a living...

I wonder how many people depend on those living on benefits? If it was possible to simply eliminate them, then presumeably massive numbers of public sector workers (benefits officers, teachers, NHS, Police etc) would be out of a job, so we'd have to get rid of them too.

Then the people who worked in shops and those that supplied other services (Sky, for example) would be out of jobs, etc etc...

Would the UK just disappear up its own ahole?

[Johnnytheboy]

Deva Link said:

ringram said:

They are thick enough to buy the st you sell and services you offer. If it wernt for them being so gullible you would have to work harder for a living...

I wonder how many people depend on those living on benefits? If it was possible to simply eliminate them, then presumeably massive numbers of public sector workers (benefits officers, teachers, NHS, Police etc) would be out of a job, so we'd have to get rid of them too.

Then the people who worked in shops and those that supplied other services (Sky, for example) would be out of jobs, etc etc...

Would the UK just disappear up its own ahole?

The old "paying public sector workers helps the economy" argument, eh?




On the other hand, if we weren't paying out something silly like 1/3 of our GDP in benefits of various sorts, plus another big chunk for people to try and look after the people on benefits, taxes could be reduced enormously, and the UK might become somewhere international businesses wanted to base themselves.

Better than the state paying people to spend money.

Have another

[NoNeed]

Somebody hss to empty your bedoan M'Lord.

[ringram]

Considering government spending is part of the GDP formula and all new money is spent into existence by the government, Id say that wishing it all away wasn't the most sensible idea.

[12gauge]

If they didnt exist, who else would the rich have to sell their crap to?

[Zaxxon]

Perhaps, we could just have a cull instead of eradication. We could start up the hunt and run it through the estates. Replace the hounds with starved Rhodesian Ridgebacks. And allow the hunters to carry assault rifles.

It could be run like The Running Man with betting on the highest kill ratio etc.

Actually, I would like to see this so much, it worries me about my mental.

[mrmr96]

Zaxxon said:

Perhaps, we could just have a cull instead of eradication. We could start up the hunt and run it through the estates. Replace the hounds with starved Rhodesian Ridgebacks. And allow the hunters to carry assault rifles.

It could be run like The Running Man with betting on the highest kill ratio etc.

Actually, I would like to see this so much, it worries me about my mental.

We don't even need to do that - just reform the benefits system so that only people who are actually disabled and in need etc get money. The rest of them will starve, go abroad, wind up in jail or find jobs.

[NismoGT]

Happy82 said:

Would anyone miss them if we simply eradicated them one evening?

No.

I'll help.

[DSM2]

Deva Link said:

I wonder how many people depend on those living on benefits? If it was possible to simply eliminate them, then presumeably massive numbers of public sector workers (benefits officers, teachers, NHS, Police etc) would be out of a job, so we'd have to get rid of them too.

Then the people who worked in shops and those that supplied other services (Sky, for example) would be out of jobs, etc etc...

Would the UK just disappear up its own ahole?

No one depends on them for anything, by definition. If they were less, yes we could have a much smaller PS. Those so displaced would find themselves wealth producing roles or go on benefit and then..........