making homemade fireworks = 2 years prison
making homemade fireworks = 2 years prison
Author
Discussion

Ayahuasca

Original Poster:

27,593 posts

310 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/92029...

Should he have been jailed for this?

I made home-made explosives fireworks when I was a kid that made little explosions, didn't harm anyone.

Anyone with basic household products is almost certainly storing 'ingredients for explosives'.


cwis

1,249 posts

210 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
Nice moves - remove the family, freedom and income of a man who knows lots about explosives. I'm sure he won't harbor a grudge against society when he gets out...

Another example of laws against terrorists being used against normal members of the public.


carmonk

7,910 posts

218 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
If he wasn't planning to harm anybody then he shouldn't have been jailed. Another failure of common sense, contrasted with the story today of a women who drove her car into an open bowling alley, whilst off her head on booze, and received...


...suspended sentence and an 18-month driving ban.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2128586/Wo...

TheEnd

15,370 posts

219 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
2 months would have done.

roachcoach

3,975 posts

186 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
2 months would have done.
Tbfh, a word in his ear from the local plod would have done.

Oakey

27,984 posts

247 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
Article said:
If there is a message to get across to anyone thinking of doing this, it is 'you are playing with fire."
I think someone playing with explosives is aware of the fking dangers without the need to dumb it down to this level.

frosted

3,549 posts

208 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
I guess if he wouldn't have stored it so close to his neighbours he might have got away with his hobby. Although I don't know the quantities involved, I would also take a dim view if I was living next door to him.

cqueen

2,652 posts

251 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
roachcoach said:
Tbfh, a word in his ear from the local plod would have done.
This.

John_S4x4

1,364 posts

288 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
He should of moved his shed over to North Korea. I believe they need his expert help now biglaugh

Chief Inspector Peter Saban, from Avon and Somerset Police, said Leonard was a "stupid man". He added that Leonard's partner had left him since his arrest.

So I wonder who informed the police then ?


Marlin45

1,334 posts

195 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
I this was enforced when I was a teenager both me and most of my mates would have been banged up! furious

OllieC

3,816 posts

245 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
carmonk said:
If he wasn't planning to harm anybody then he shouldn't have been jailed. Another failure of common sense, contrasted with the story today of a women who drove her car into an open bowling alley, whilst off her head on booze, and received...


...suspended sentence and an 18-month driving ban.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2128586/Wo...
Unbelieveably lenient sentence that, does make you wonder !?

ElvisPenhaligon

91 posts

176 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
My dad introduced me to home made fireworks when I was a child....he also introduced me to the hazards of chemistry.

As a chemist and not a terrorist, I reserve the right to buy chemicals and make what I want, as long as I do not:-

1. Kill anyone.
2. Cause loss to anyone.
3. Involve fraud buying the chemicals.

The police can shove their statute bks up their arse.

Common sense does need to prevail. A word from the cops would suffice. Are they totally mad, or are they not telling us the whole story.

Ayahuasca

Original Poster:

27,593 posts

310 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
ElvisPenhaligon said:
are they not telling us the whole story.
That seems to be the only reasonable explanation. This must have gone from the police to the CPS to the Magistrates Court to the Crown Court so lots of intelligent people must have considered it.

It is bizarre.

LordFlathead

9,646 posts

289 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
He is a hero and we should embrace him. He obviously designed the Korean rocket wink

Getragdogleg

10,306 posts

214 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
2 years, for not actually hurting anyone ? for just being a bit daft and keeping some stuff that might explode and could hurt some people if any happened to be around at the time.

What the fking fk am i going to hear/read next ? Man (54 from cannock) arrested because he looked at knives in the Argos catalogue ? woman (32 of romford) imprisoned because she looked a bit cross ?

I said a while ago in another of these piss boiling state-of-the-nation type posts that crop up with alarming regularity that we ought to just put a fence around the British isles and call ourselves a prison, we would all be felons, that is what the state seems to want and to be honest it might be easier.

ElvisPenhaligon

91 posts

176 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
I would like them to man up and add what "dangerous chemicals" he was using/storing. I am assuming he means Acetone Peroxide as "the shoe bomber explosive". Let's not just say "Acetone Peroxide" as that's just a chemical name, let's associate him with Bin Laden's lot.

I'd like to have heard what a chemist would have to say. Fire/police people are not chemists or explosives experts and consider most "stuff" to be an awful dangerous hazard that should be banned.

Acetone Peroxide is exceedingly unstable and if you go about the synthesis right, you can have something which won't spontaneously explode, it is still exceedingly dangerous stuff. So, am I right in thinking he had an "experimental" amount, or was this enough to take half the hillside out?

Unlawful purposes? So, killing people, causing loss to people, or are they confusing it with "illegal" which is a totally different animal.

I find it hard to believe that they have come down so hard on someone in the middle of nowhere doing stuff many many many people do on youtube.

They really should have got some experts in to really consider this fairly, rather than the fanny of nanny state.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

277 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
This guy is said to have been making "high explosive" which is far beyond any domestic stirring of chemicals to see if you can make a firework.

"High explosive" is a compound which isn't just burning very quickly and emitting a lot of gas (like gunpowder) but is sufficiently unstable that the shock of part of the explosive being set off causes an immediate chain reaction where the whole lot goes up at once with immense pressure and force. You know, the kind of thing where if it goes wrong it won't just demolish your shed but might take out a few neighbouring houses as well.

anonymous-user

85 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
i'm a chemist and i wouldn't make acetone peroxide. nobody who knows what they are doing would really try to prepare any in any great quantity.

I think this is a real shame, this guy is just doing his hobby, perhaps puts a few people in a small amount of danger (we can't tell from the article because there are not enough facts), seems to be doing it in a fairly responsible way, and ends up in prison. no wonder chemistry has such a bad public image - or is this perhaps a result of 'chemophobia'

the interesting quote it this one:

said:
Chief Inspector Peter Saban, from Avon and Somerset Police, said Leonard was a "stupid man".

"He is not a domestic terrorist. This is a man simply in his back yard combining chemicals to create explosives," he said.
"Nevertheless it is a really dangerous thing to do, and not a reasonable thing to do. If there is a message to get across to anyone thinking of doing this, it is 'you are playing with fire."
it's an attempt to make chemistry a special class of knowledge that can only be investigated or excercised by specially anointed priests (chemists). I don't think it's a good idea to make areas of knowledge and expertise unavailable to the general public in this way. This is something that 50 years ago would never have been criminal. It's just an eccentric hobby.

Edited by Use Psychology on Friday 13th April 18:32


Edited by Use Psychology on Friday 13th April 18:33

anonymous-user

85 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
This guy is said to have been making "high explosive" which is far beyond any domestic stirring of chemicals to see if you can make a firework.

"High explosive" is a compound which isn't just burning very quickly and emitting a lot of gas (like gunpowder) but is sufficiently unstable that the shock of part of the explosive being set off causes an immediate chain reaction where the whole lot goes up at once with immense pressure and force. You know, the kind of thing where if it goes wrong it won't just demolish your shed but might take out a few neighbouring houses as well.
high explosives aren't neccesarily unstable though, indeed a good one isn't, you want a big bang when you want to make it go pop but you want it to sit there like rocks until you want that bang.

Ayahuasca

Original Poster:

27,593 posts

310 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
Use Psychology said:
i'm a chemist and i wouldn't make acetone peroxide.
According to wki the Shoe Bomber used Acetone Peroxide as a detonator but the primary explosive was something called Pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN).