Tony Blair - GQ philanthropist of the year
Discussion
It is not April the 1st, is it ?
Tony Blair has been named ‘Philanthropist of the Year’ at the GQ Men Of The Year awards.
Tony blair is the GQ philanthropist of the year
Tony Blair has been named ‘Philanthropist of the Year’ at the GQ Men Of The Year awards.
Tony blair is the GQ philanthropist of the year
Can you not see honesty and empathy pouring out of every pore ?
The next step is canonisation, to become Saint Tony of Kensington... or possibly the other canonisation, involving his interaction with rapidly moving chunks of jacketed lead.
I know which one I am partial for him to experience.
The next step is canonisation, to become Saint Tony of Kensington... or possibly the other canonisation, involving his interaction with rapidly moving chunks of jacketed lead.
I know which one I am partial for him to experience.
Pickled said:
gherkins said:
Humanitarian: Ringo Starr
Well, I suppose we can be glad it's not Bono and perhaps I'm not aware of the great works he gets up to, but...
...Ringo Starr?
Leading steam engine preservationist on the Isle of Soddor?Well, I suppose we can be glad it's not Bono and perhaps I'm not aware of the great works he gets up to, but...
...Ringo Starr?
Having read GQ a few times over the years. I'm not surprised by this decision. SO far out of touch with reality on everything from fashion to style to interior design to even their crappy half arsed fawning interviews.
I get they want to play to the uber cool late 20s/early 30s young professionals crowd. But when they are plugging sofas for £8-10K you do wonder who in this country is buying their rag? Patrick Bateman?
I get they want to play to the uber cool late 20s/early 30s young professionals crowd. But when they are plugging sofas for £8-10K you do wonder who in this country is buying their rag? Patrick Bateman?
Rich_W said:
Having read GQ a few times over the years. I'm not surprised by this decision. SO far out of touch with reality on everything from fashion to style to interior design to even their crappy half arsed fawning interviews.
I get they want to play to the uber cool late 20s/early 30s young professionals crowd. But when they are plugging sofas for £8-10K you do wonder who in this country is buying their rag? Patrick Bateman?
Paul Allen?I get they want to play to the uber cool late 20s/early 30s young professionals crowd. But when they are plugging sofas for £8-10K you do wonder who in this country is buying their rag? Patrick Bateman?
hepy said:
Rich_W said:
Having read GQ a few times over the years. I'm not surprised by this decision. SO far out of touch with reality on everything from fashion to style to interior design to even their crappy half arsed fawning interviews.
I get they want to play to the uber cool late 20s/early 30s young professionals crowd. But when they are plugging sofas for £8-10K you do wonder who in this country is buying their rag? Patrick Bateman?
Paul Allen?I get they want to play to the uber cool late 20s/early 30s young professionals crowd. But when they are plugging sofas for £8-10K you do wonder who in this country is buying their rag? Patrick Bateman?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff