Killer of Porsche driver gets jailed for life
Killer of Porsche driver gets jailed for life
Author
Discussion

M4cruiser

Original Poster:

5,237 posts

181 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
It went pretty much as I expected!


Edited by M4cruiser on Saturday 28th February 13:29

DanielSan

20,104 posts

198 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
This is not going to go like you hope it does.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

157 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
M4cruiser said:
This was a complex case, but may I clarify that no one is suggesting she was killed for her Porsche.
Why is the fact she drove a Porsche even vaguely relevant? What is this doing here?

M4cruiser said:
I wonder if all those who ridiculed me back in June will now realise that I wasn't far wrong
Can I be the first (of many, probably) to ridicule you here?

Blaster72

12,707 posts

228 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
M4cruiser said:
A very sad situation, but I suppose the full extent of British justice has prevailed.
This was a complex case, but may I clarify that no one is suggesting she was killed for her Porsche.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-316193...

To quote a few choice relevant statements from this article:-
"The jury heard how Legris killed his second wife at their home in Burnham Drive, Bournemouth, as his finances were "desperate" and he wanted to cash in on her £300,000 life insurance policy"
"Winchester Crown Court heard the couple were swingers who ran a "sexual massage" service and the murder was financially motivated"
"Ms Li, 44, was last seen leaving Poole Hospital in her Porsche Boxster where she worked as a nurse, on 23 May last year"
"The same day the bigamist moved Ms Li's body into the boot of a Fiat Punto, owned by Jonathan Legris"

I wonder if all those who ridiculed me back in June will now realise that I wasn't far wrong, but it would have been inappropriate to discuss in this kind of detail until the case finished.

So, Rui Li drove a Porsche, other family menbers drove a Transit van and a Punto, and the finances were "desperate". That's some of the facts of the case, as now published.

censored
Does anyone have a clue what the OP is blithering on about? confused

soad

34,741 posts

207 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
Porsche driver missing, possibly murdered: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Funkycoldribena

7,379 posts

185 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
Does anyone have a clue what the OP is blithering on about? confused
Nope,beats the st out of me.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

157 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
soad said:
Porsche driver missing, possibly murdered: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
The OP's last contribution to that thread...
M4cruiser said:
For the doubters - you may find that both the car and the number plate take on a significance in this case - but of course we won't find out for a few months, assuming the charge progresses to a court case.
So, umm...
M4cruiser said:
...may I clarify that no one is suggesting she was killed for her Porsche.
...
I wonder if all those who ridiculed me back in June will now realise that I wasn't far wrong
Revisionism, anybody?

Blaster72

12,707 posts

228 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
soad said:
Porsche driver missing, possibly murdered: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...
Read that thread, still don't have a clue

TheEnd

15,370 posts

219 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
What's the big thing about the Porsche, and the note that absolutely no one is saying she was killed for the Porsche, because the Porsche wasn't the reason 100%.

No Porsche killing, absolutely certain.

Final answer.

Porsche = no.


M4cruiser

Original Poster:

5,237 posts

181 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
Just for once I think (my opinion) that the BBC had a better report (with more pertinent information) than the local paper, the Bournemouth Echo.

To those who can't understand what we're on about down here, the detail you need is in the reports.

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/11823733.Rui...

... and being talked about in the local community.



Dan_1981

18,124 posts

230 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
Am I right here that the issue you have seems to be that she was offering "massage" services, and no doubt that's how she funded the Porsche you were so caught up on?

I'm not so sure why it's an issue that she may or may not have been a hooker?


Why not be a little clearer as both your original thread and this one, do nothing but confuse the majority of us.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

157 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
Dan_1981 said:
I'm not so sure why it's an issue that she may or may not have been a hooker?
She told him he was the only one?

iambeowulf

712 posts

203 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
M4cruiser said:
It went pretty much as I expected!


Edited by M4cruiser on Saturday 28th February 13:29
Too slow Sherlock.

soad

34,741 posts

207 months

Saturday 28th February 2015
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Dan_1981 said:
I'm not so sure why it's an issue that she may or may not have been a hooker?
She told him he was the only one?
Dark humour. biggrin

k-ink

9,070 posts

210 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
I am late to this discussion and missed the original story. Let me get this straight, in summary... someone kills a Porsche, then gets jailed. How was this deed carried out? Did they beat it with a tree branch?

robemcdonald

10,054 posts

227 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
I'm not really sure what this is all about, but is something to do with broadchurch?

Sheepshanks

41,306 posts

150 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
I might need a whoosh parrot here, but what it's really about is the murdered person was seen to be driving a vehicle beyond their station, therefore it was assumed that something dodgy was going on.

FraserLFA

5,083 posts

205 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
robemcdonald said:
I'm not really sure what this is all about, but is something to do with broadchurch?
We're trying to solve the mystery of who will watch season 3.

iphonedyou

10,424 posts

188 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Consider me clueless also - assistance in understanding what OP is talking about welcomed.

anonymous-user

85 months

Sunday 1st March 2015
quotequote all
Its like this
The OP (of this thread) hinted in the previous thread that the woman involved earned Part of her money through the provision of sexual services. He knew this and was pointing it out.
It was obviously a major concern and would come as a shock to find that a nurse of someone in the health care section moonlighted as a hooker. The OP may have had a view on that.
On the other hand he may have been a regular client of hers and spent large portions of his income in financing his meetings with the woman. He may have been found out when he remortgaged his house and his wife asked why. The final straw may have been when he had to sell his own Porsche and downgrade to a 2001 Clio with go faster stripes.
This is what sin does. It gets you down it drags you down
I'm with Mrs White on this one:

"the first sin was intercourse, the first sin was intercourse" etc
smile