Builder fined £300 by council for carrying crisp packets
Builder fined £300 by council for carrying crisp packets
Author
Discussion

vitesse2000

Original Poster:

369 posts

193 months

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

200 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Did you read the entire article?

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
He's an idiot.

Shuvi McTupya

24,460 posts

277 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
So he isn't being fined for carrying his rubbish around, but because of the type of rubbish bag he was carrying rubbish around in?

I guess in the future he will just chuck it out the window as if he does get caught it would be a much smaller fine.

Excellent use of government powers..


caelite

4,282 posts

142 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
He's an idiot.
Alucidnation said:
Did you read the entire article?
Sorry am I missing the same thing the OP did?

Roofer uses commercial bin bag at the back of his van to pile his rubbish in. Council workers take this as him 'transporting waste'. Roofer doesn't have a permit to transport waste and is fined £300.

Surely this is a case of missunderstanding between the roofer and the council workers, as it seemed obvious from the article that was his own personal waste, regardless of the manner of bin bag used. In which case the fine doesn't really have merit. Or, as I said, am I missing a point in the article?

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Yep sounds like Nazi German5y. What a waste of time, '' he had a waste carriers' licence, which are required by any business that transports commercial refuse.'' Seriously crisp packets...

Butter Face

34,878 posts

190 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
I would guess he failed the ‘roadside attitude’ test and gave them lip, probably something about how he pays their wages with council tax hehe

So they’re gonna stitch him up proper like.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
caelite said:
Roofer uses commercial bin bag at the back of his van to pile his rubbish in. Council workers take this as him 'transporting waste'. Roofer doesn't have a permit to transport waste and is fined £300.
He has a bag, which he has paid for, under the understanding that it is to contain commercial waste.
He does not have a licence to carry commercial waste.

Sure, it's got some crisp bags in the top. But what's underneath? You are not telling me that bag is JUST his lunch rubbish from the site that he's been working on, and undoubtedly generating commercial waste while he works...

He's taking the piss, and he got caught. He needs to pay to dispose of his commercial waste properly - and that means getting a skip on-site.

Derek Smith

49,865 posts

278 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Talking of rubbish, there's more to this than reported.

TheRainMaker

7,882 posts

272 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Stupid thing is it would be free for him the register 😕

Davie_GLA

6,885 posts

229 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
vitesse2000 said:
You didn't read this fully at first. Did you?

Randy Winkman

22,510 posts

219 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
I wonder why he had the commercial waste bag?

Busterbulldog

670 posts

161 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Probably would have had a lesser fine if he had slung it out the window.

Randy Winkman

22,510 posts

219 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Or perhaps no fine at all if he'd just put the rubbish in a normal plastic bag.

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
Or perhaps no fine at all if he'd just put the rubbish in a normal plastic bag.
...and all the actual trade waste (also in the bag) into the skip.

powerstroke

10,283 posts

190 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Won't someone think of the non job's we have to find something for all those people with pointless degrees to do ...

cherryowen

12,561 posts

234 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all


That is not a "commercial waste" bag FFS.

It's a common or garden disposal bag filled with lunch detritus. Considering the guy is a roofer by trade, I would expect him to be nicked if he was carrying a 1 tonne sized sand bag filled with slates / tiles / timber laths / roofing felt offcuts, in which case - yes - I'd expect him to possess a Waste Carriers Licence.

Fining him for carrying a small bag of waste mineral water bottles and some empty bags of dreary baked "crisps" is cheerlessness on an olympic scale.




Rovinghawk

13,300 posts

188 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
"We need these powers- we won't abuse them"

TooMany2cvs

29,008 posts

156 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
cherryowen said:


That is not a "commercial waste" bag FFS.

It's a common or garden disposal bag filled with lunch detritus. Considering the guy is a roofer by trade, I would expect him to be nicked if he was carrying a 1 tonne sized sand bag filled with slates / tiles / timber laths / roofing felt offcuts, in which case - yes - I'd expect him to possess a Waste Carriers Licence.

Fining him for carrying a small bag of waste mineral water bottles and some empty bags of dreary baked "crisps" is cheerlessness on an olympic scale.
Or option B.

It's not the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. It's his "But why meeeeee?" compo-face spin.

Kccv23highliftcam

1,783 posts

105 months

Friday 3rd August 2018
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
cherryowen said:


That is not a "commercial waste" bag FFS.

It's a common or garden disposal bag filled with lunch detritus. Considering the guy is a roofer by trade, I would expect him to be nicked if he was carrying a 1 tonne sized sand bag filled with slates / tiles / timber laths / roofing felt offcuts, in which case - yes - I'd expect him to possess a Waste Carriers Licence.

Fining him for carrying a small bag of waste mineral water bottles and some empty bags of dreary baked "crisps" is cheerlessness on an olympic scale.
Or option B.

It's not the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. It's his "But why meeeeee?" compo-face spin.
Get a fking grip 2cvs.