No such thing as rehabilitation.
No such thing as rehabilitation.
Author
Discussion

Jaroon

Original Poster:

1,441 posts

190 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
No such thing as rehabilitation per se. With caviates, If prison is so intolerable that as a dererrent the fear of receiving the the same treatment will prevent reoffendng is the only way incarceration works beyond the short term have them off the streets situation.

deckster

9,631 posts

285 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
Unpopular opinions thread is over that way ----->

Johnspex

5,254 posts

214 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
Jaroon said:
No such thing as rehabilitation per se. With caviates, If prison is so intolerable that as a dererrent the fear of receiving the the same treatment will prevent reoffendng is the only way incarceration works beyond the short term have them off the streets situation.
I've read that several times and it still makes no sense. Have you ever thought of investing in a few full stops and commas?

hairykrishna

14,503 posts

233 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
The evidence suggests that countries that focus on rehabilitation in prison, rather than making them hellholes, have far lower rates of recidivism. Makes me think your theory is wrong.

Also, you write like st. Sort it out.

ruggedscotty

5,996 posts

239 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
The evidence suggests that countries that focus on execution for certain crimes have an offender zero repeat rate for said crimes.....

Personally in any case that someone is murdered with no doubt of the perpetrator then an execution should be carried out. I don't want this person to be sent to prison and be kept alive.

loafer123

16,731 posts

245 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
hairykrishna said:
The evidence suggests that countries that focus on rehabilitation in prison, rather than making them hellholes, have far lower rates of recidivism. Makes me think your theory is wrong.

Norway is the gold standard, but costs 3x the US prison per inmate.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
Norway is the gold standard, but costs 3x the US prison per inmate.
A cost worth spending if it means less crime, less victims and less ruined lives.

loafer123

16,731 posts

245 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
biggbn said:
loafer123 said:
Norway is the gold standard, but costs 3x the US prison per inmate.
A cost worth spending if it means less crime, less victims and less ruined lives.
Please show your workings.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
biggbn said:
loafer123 said:
Norway is the gold standard, but costs 3x the US prison per inmate.
A cost worth spending if it means less crime, less victims and less ruined lives.
Please show your workings.
To whom are you asking the question? My reply was to the poster who suggested Norway was the gold standard and cost 3x as much as America's pretty useless system. My opinion is that that is an investment worth spending. If you disagree that's cool man, but if you are asking for figures I can only apply common sense. More rehabilitated criminals means less victims means less lives ruined. Sorry if this does not help you.

Scootersp

4,115 posts

218 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
Please show your workings.
They have approx x10 less prisoners per 100,000 so overall costs per capita are lower so they must be doing something right?



loafer123

16,731 posts

245 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
biggbn said:
loafer123 said:
biggbn said:
loafer123 said:
Norway is the gold standard, but costs 3x the US prison per inmate.
A cost worth spending if it means less crime, less victims and less ruined lives.
Please show your workings.
To whom are you asking the question? My reply was to the poster who suggested Norway was the gold standard and cost 3x as much as America's pretty useless system. My opinion is that that is an investment worth spending. If you disagree that's cool man, but if you are asking for figures I can only apply common sense. More rehabilitated criminals means less victims means less lives ruined. Sorry if this does not help you.
That poster was me.

Given your propensity for spending taxpayers money in your posts on here, I was curious where your view that “it was worth it” ended...If the cost is £1m per prisoner, is might not be worth it.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
That poster was me.

Given your propensity for spending taxpayers money in your posts on here, I was curious where your view that “it was worth it” ended...If the cost is £1m per prisoner, is might not be worth it.
I agree, pragmatism must kick in at some point, or perhaps we could spend current investment more wisely?

loafer123

16,731 posts

245 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
Scootersp said:
loafer123 said:
Please show your workings.
They have approx x10 less prisoners per 100,000 so overall costs per capita are lower so they must be doing something right?
Yes, possibly, as long as their overall outcomes are as good or better. I definitely think that many prisoners shouldn’t be in prison and should be doing non-custodial sentences instead.

CloaK

92 posts

127 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
Jaroon said:
No such thing as rehabilitation per se. With caviates, If prison is so intolerable that as a dererrent the fear of receiving the the same treatment will prevent reoffendng is the only way incarceration works beyond the short term have them off the streets situation.
What if no-one gives the rehabilitated offender a job?

What good is the rehabilitation?

This is the big issue and if you follow the news you'll have seen a few initiatives recently.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2019/04/03/ja...

BTW most criminals commit crime with the thought that they won't be caught therefore it's somewhat immaterial how good or bad prisons are.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
CloaK said:
What if no-one gives the rehabilitated offender a job?

What good is the rehabilitation?

This is the big issue and if you follow the news you'll have seen a few initiatives recently.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2019/04/03/ja...

BTW most criminals commit crime with the thought that they won't be caught therefore it's somewhat immaterial how good or bad prisons are.
The job thing is a great point, a wee bit of research suggests a large cultural shift would be required for the reintegration of offenders. Again, Norway seems to do well here if memory serves

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
How can you argue with such a superb opening post?

loafer123 said:
biggbn said:
loafer123 said:
Norway is the gold standard, but costs 3x the US prison per inmate.
A cost worth spending if it means less crime, less victims and less ruined lives.
Please show your workings.
Repeat offending usually results in longer sentences. Repeat offending costs more in the long-term.

Apparently 20% vs 70% re-offending rate within 5 years.



Ekona

1,684 posts

232 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
I work in a prison. You would not believe the training and effort that goes into a rehabilitative culture, but ultimately it can only work if the person themselves wants to change. There is every opportunity and support for those that want to, but some people come in and just refuse to ever co-operate with the staff. Those that do find themselves in a much better place upon release, but for many it's just something that happens between crimes. Those people you'll struggle to ever change.

That's before we start down the route of the men that have mental health issues that we really aren't equipped to deal with, or the many crazy ideas of management that are so far removed from the coal face you wonder what they're thinking of. Personally I'd rather be making an effort to change attitudes and thinking than I would be simply punishing people continuously.

sparkythecat

8,098 posts

285 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
As we already successfully offshore many services, why don't we outsource our Prison services to some third world countries?
We could save a fortune and any survivors would be much less likely to reoffend.

Drumroll

4,523 posts

150 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
Jaroon said:
No such thing as rehabilitation per se. With caviates, If prison is so intolerable that as a dererrent the fear of receiving the the same treatment will prevent reoffendng is the only way incarceration works beyond the short term have them off the streets situation.


That is your opinion sir and you are entitled to it. Others will disagree. It may come as a shock to you but ideas about prison have moved on in the last couple of Centuries.

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 13th June 2019
quotequote all
Ekona said:
I work in a prison. You would not believe the training and effort that goes into a rehabilitative culture, but ultimately it can only work if the person themselves wants to change. There is every opportunity and support for those that want to, but some people come in and just refuse to ever co-operate with the staff. Those that do find themselves in a much better place upon release, but for many it's just something that happens between crimes. Those people you'll struggle to ever change.

That's before we start down the route of the men that have mental health issues that we really aren't equipped to deal with, or the many crazy ideas of management that are so far removed from the coal face you wonder what they're thinking of. Personally I'd rather be making an effort to change attitudes and thinking than I would be simply punishing people continuously.
Thanks for this informative post