You’ll now get fined for ignoring the Red X on a motorway
You’ll now get fined for ignoring the Red X on a motorway
Author
Discussion

Halb

Original Poster:

53,012 posts

214 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
You’ll now get fined for ignoring the Red X on a motorway
https://www.petrolprices.com/news/get-fined-ignori...

SmoothCriminal

5,977 posts

230 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Good.

No excuse for the amount of S who ignore them.

JulianHJ

8,871 posts

293 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Hasn’t this been the case for some time?

bigandclever

14,418 posts

269 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
You'd have been fined if you'd done it before, but had to be seen by a copper. Now it's an automated (camera) fine.

don'tbesilly

15,362 posts

194 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
JulianHJ said:
Hasn’t this been the case for some time?
It has, however:

Punishment for using a closed lane isn’t new. Failure to obey a lawful traffic sign is an offence under section 36(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 and you risk a fine of up to £1,000 plus three penalty points, or even disqualification. Until now, prosecution for ignoring a red X sign relied on a police officer witnessing the offence.

The gantry cameras will now do what plod could only do if they witnessed the offence.

98elise

32,868 posts

192 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
SmoothCriminal said:
Good.

No excuse for the amount of S who ignore them.
Agreed.

I've witnessed emergency services being held up (stationary) because the red x lane was chock full tossers who thought it didn't apply to them.



CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

229 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Almost like hard shoulders were a great idea.

Lagom

564 posts

93 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
98elise said:
Agreed.

I've witnessed emergency services being held up (stationary) because the red x lane was chock full tossers who thought it didn't apply to them.
"But it's ok to go through the X as I'm coming off at the next junction" tossers

4941cc

25,878 posts

237 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Good.

Yet no apparent enforcement of fining MLMs...

g3org3y

22,523 posts

222 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all

Pit Pony

11,510 posts

152 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Halb said:
You’ll now get fined for ignoring the Red X on a motorway
https://www.petrolprices.com/news/get-fined-ignori...
Which is better than dying because you ignored it.

C.A.R.

3,993 posts

219 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Was the case just last week on the M25 - just past J18 / Rickmansworth there was a lane closure in 3 (aka "the fast lane") traffic was slowed to 40mph, then a crawl, but whilst arrows preceded the red X's there was loads of c*ckwombles just driving down the lane completely oblivious - driving right up to the Highways Land Rover parked in L3 and stopping, then indicating to move over.

It's mental that people can be so selfish.

MKnight702

3,440 posts

245 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
C.A.R. said:
Was the case just last week on the M25 - just past J18 / Rickmansworth there was a lane closure in 3 (aka "the fast lane") traffic was slowed to 40mph, then a crawl, but whilst arrows preceded the red X's there was loads of c*ckwombles just driving down the lane completely oblivious - driving right up to the Highways Land Rover parked in L3 and stopping, then indicating to move over.

It's mental that people can be so selfish.
Really, you are surprised at the level of entitlement displayed by many?

On the other hand it is equally likely that the muppets just "didn't see" the multiple flashing gantry signs, illuminated red crosses, Highways Landrover painted with fluorescent stripes and fitted with bright flashing lights, because that would mean looking further ahead than the inside of the windscreen.

4941cc

25,878 posts

237 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
MKnight702 said:
On the other hand it is equally likely that the muppets just "didn't see" the multiple flashing gantry signs, illuminated red crosses, Highways Landrover painted with fluorescent stripes and fitted with bright flashing lights, because that would mean looking further ahead than the inside of the windscreen.
They'd have to look up from their phones...

Robertj21a

18,009 posts

136 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Excellent news, long overdue.

alangla

6,830 posts

212 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Seen a few instances on the M8 recently where an advisory speed has been followed by a red X on an overhead gantry without the usual move left/,move right arrow in between. Hopefully as part of issuing the fine there will be some verification that the correct sequence of warnings was shown before the X.

julian64

14,325 posts

285 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
C.A.R. said:
Was the case just last week on the M25 - just past J18 / Rickmansworth there was a lane closure in 3 (aka "the fast lane") traffic was slowed to 40mph, then a crawl, but whilst arrows preceded the red X's there was loads of c*ckwombles just driving down the lane completely oblivious - driving right up to the Highways Land Rover parked in L3 and stopping, then indicating to move over.

It's mental that people can be so selfish.
I think you'll find most of these people reside on Pistonheads, and are, in fact, the merge in turn experts.

mickk

30,539 posts

273 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
julian64 said:
I think you'll find most of these people reside on Pistonheads, and are, in fact, the merge in turn experts.
yes

Yes but that's okay 'cause it keeps the traffic flowing.

KarlMac

4,627 posts

172 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Good. Two people lost there lives near me recently because a lorry wasn’t paying attention.

otolith

69,688 posts

235 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
julian64 said:
I think you'll find most of these people reside on Pistonheads, and are, in fact, the merge in turn experts.
I think you'll find that they expect to merge in turn where the signage indicates that the lane closes.

edit - ah - they ignored the arrows - well, if that resulted in them getting too close to the obstruction, the lane should have closed earlier.

Edited by otolith on Tuesday 18th June 15:44