You’ll now get fined for ignoring the Red X on a motorway
You’ll now get fined for ignoring the Red X on a motorway
Author
Discussion

Halb

Original Poster:

53,012 posts

212 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
You’ll now get fined for ignoring the Red X on a motorway
https://www.petrolprices.com/news/get-fined-ignori...

SmoothCriminal

5,942 posts

228 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Good.

No excuse for the amount of S who ignore them.

JulianHJ

8,868 posts

291 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Hasn’t this been the case for some time?

bigandclever

14,361 posts

267 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
You'd have been fined if you'd done it before, but had to be seen by a copper. Now it's an automated (camera) fine.

don'tbesilly

15,362 posts

192 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
JulianHJ said:
Hasn’t this been the case for some time?
It has, however:

Punishment for using a closed lane isn’t new. Failure to obey a lawful traffic sign is an offence under section 36(1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 and you risk a fine of up to £1,000 plus three penalty points, or even disqualification. Until now, prosecution for ignoring a red X sign relied on a police officer witnessing the offence.

The gantry cameras will now do what plod could only do if they witnessed the offence.

98elise

32,597 posts

190 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
SmoothCriminal said:
Good.

No excuse for the amount of S who ignore them.
Agreed.

I've witnessed emergency services being held up (stationary) because the red x lane was chock full tossers who thought it didn't apply to them.



CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

227 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Almost like hard shoulders were a great idea.

Lagom

564 posts

91 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
98elise said:
Agreed.

I've witnessed emergency services being held up (stationary) because the red x lane was chock full tossers who thought it didn't apply to them.
"But it's ok to go through the X as I'm coming off at the next junction" tossers

4941cc

25,867 posts

235 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Good.

Yet no apparent enforcement of fining MLMs...

g3org3y

22,466 posts

220 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all

Pit Pony

11,307 posts

150 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Halb said:
You’ll now get fined for ignoring the Red X on a motorway
https://www.petrolprices.com/news/get-fined-ignori...
Which is better than dying because you ignored it.

C.A.R.

3,992 posts

217 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Was the case just last week on the M25 - just past J18 / Rickmansworth there was a lane closure in 3 (aka "the fast lane") traffic was slowed to 40mph, then a crawl, but whilst arrows preceded the red X's there was loads of c*ckwombles just driving down the lane completely oblivious - driving right up to the Highways Land Rover parked in L3 and stopping, then indicating to move over.

It's mental that people can be so selfish.

MKnight702

3,433 posts

243 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
C.A.R. said:
Was the case just last week on the M25 - just past J18 / Rickmansworth there was a lane closure in 3 (aka "the fast lane") traffic was slowed to 40mph, then a crawl, but whilst arrows preceded the red X's there was loads of c*ckwombles just driving down the lane completely oblivious - driving right up to the Highways Land Rover parked in L3 and stopping, then indicating to move over.

It's mental that people can be so selfish.
Really, you are surprised at the level of entitlement displayed by many?

On the other hand it is equally likely that the muppets just "didn't see" the multiple flashing gantry signs, illuminated red crosses, Highways Landrover painted with fluorescent stripes and fitted with bright flashing lights, because that would mean looking further ahead than the inside of the windscreen.

4941cc

25,867 posts

235 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
MKnight702 said:
On the other hand it is equally likely that the muppets just "didn't see" the multiple flashing gantry signs, illuminated red crosses, Highways Landrover painted with fluorescent stripes and fitted with bright flashing lights, because that would mean looking further ahead than the inside of the windscreen.
They'd have to look up from their phones...

Robertj21a

18,009 posts

134 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Excellent news, long overdue.

alangla

6,736 posts

210 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Seen a few instances on the M8 recently where an advisory speed has been followed by a red X on an overhead gantry without the usual move left/,move right arrow in between. Hopefully as part of issuing the fine there will be some verification that the correct sequence of warnings was shown before the X.

julian64

14,325 posts

283 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
C.A.R. said:
Was the case just last week on the M25 - just past J18 / Rickmansworth there was a lane closure in 3 (aka "the fast lane") traffic was slowed to 40mph, then a crawl, but whilst arrows preceded the red X's there was loads of c*ckwombles just driving down the lane completely oblivious - driving right up to the Highways Land Rover parked in L3 and stopping, then indicating to move over.

It's mental that people can be so selfish.
I think you'll find most of these people reside on Pistonheads, and are, in fact, the merge in turn experts.

mickk

30,458 posts

271 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
julian64 said:
I think you'll find most of these people reside on Pistonheads, and are, in fact, the merge in turn experts.
yes

Yes but that's okay 'cause it keeps the traffic flowing.

KarlMac

4,626 posts

170 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Good. Two people lost there lives near me recently because a lorry wasn’t paying attention.

otolith

68,900 posts

233 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
julian64 said:
I think you'll find most of these people reside on Pistonheads, and are, in fact, the merge in turn experts.
I think you'll find that they expect to merge in turn where the signage indicates that the lane closes.

edit - ah - they ignored the arrows - well, if that resulted in them getting too close to the obstruction, the lane should have closed earlier.

Edited by otolith on Tuesday 18th June 15:44