Avi Maharaj - The pawnography watching policeman
Avi Maharaj - The pawnography watching policeman
Author
Discussion

jakesmith

Original Poster:

9,496 posts

195 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
Setting aside the incredible inappropriateness of this - you really have to wonder how bright this guy is, did he think it wouldn't be noticed!?
And why didn't he just look at pornhub on his mobile?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-49594...

HoHoHo

15,383 posts

274 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
Wow, just wow...

What else did he do he hasn’t admitted to spermhurl

Caddyshack

14,223 posts

230 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
He won’t get an easy time in prison from the other inmates, I expect.

Someone I know went to prison for 2 yrs, he is very normal looking. He gave a lot of prison currency (tuna) to a particularly nasty looking fella to look after him. The nasty chap came to his cell and said a rumour was going around that a policeman had been sent to that prison and as this chap I know looked the most ‘straight" they assumed it was him and word was he was going to get the bad news. He had to clear his name very quickly.

anonymous-user

78 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
In normal circumstances someone wouldn't go to prison for a minor fraud. They wouldn't even go to court. They'd get a caution (if they admitted it).

However, it's a pretty aggravated offence in the circumstances so a custodial sentence is probably justified. Perhaps 6 months may have been a better balance given the lack of risk he poses etc.

Caddyshack said:
He won’t get an easy time in prison from the other inmates, I expect.
I don't think that'll be the case. I've known of police officers who've gone to prison and had no issues.


Penelope Stopit

11,209 posts

133 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
Would anyone happen to know the names of the movies?

Ayahuasca

27,560 posts

303 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
Gross breach of the public trust.

Johnnytheboy

24,499 posts

210 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
Is paying for porn a thing any more? Wow!

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

210 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
What a wker!

Wacky Racer

40,794 posts

271 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
The man's a fool.

He's lost his career and his pension, why couldn't he wait until the end of his shift?

A cousin of mine was kicked out of the force in 1973 for stealing a few empty lemonade bottles and taking them round to the corner shop and getting 3p back on them. rolleyes

anonymous-user

78 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
ash73 said:
La Liga said:
it's a pretty aggravated offence in the circumstances
In what way?
Really?

He fraudulently downloaded porn to watch on the family's account whilst their dead son was in the other room. The family who were trusting him to guard their house and son until he was removed. They also initially believed their son downloaded the films.







Pesty

42,655 posts

280 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
Scum.

Why was he guarding a dead body anyway?

That doesn’t seem like normal service the police provide.

easytiger123

2,665 posts

233 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
Penelope Stopit said:
Would anyone happen to know the names of the movies?
Asking for a friend I assume? Very decent of you.

Penelope Stopit

11,209 posts

133 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
easytiger123 said:
Penelope Stopit said:
Would anyone happen to know the names of the movies?
Asking for a friend I assume? Very decent of you.
Thank you

anonymous-user

78 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
Pesty said:
Scum.

Why was he guarding a dead body anyway?

That doesn’t seem like normal service the police provide.
It's a sudden, unnatural death so it must be reported to the coroner. The police act on behalf of the coroner during a sudden death and will complete a report for the coroner.

A suicide is usually treated as a crime scene until it's believed it is a suicide and nothing suspicious.

The body isn't being 'guarded' as such. It's for continuity between the police and people who will remove the body. There doesn't want to be a gap which can't be accounted for in case something is discovered later on. Whether that be cause / injuries / property going missing from the body etc.

There can also be delicate issues which need to be resolved i.e. the family won't want the child to be removed etc.


xjay1337

15,966 posts

142 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
ash73 said:
Being punished more severely because he's a police officer is fair enough, but is his crime technically any worse because of the circumstances? The judge seems to think so.

What would be the normal punishment for hacking an internet account and stealing videos worth a few quid?

12 months jail seems a bit excessive.
Agreed.

But I suspect the judge is sending a message.
Whatever that means.

vaud

58,214 posts

179 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
ash73 said:
Being punished more severely because he's a police officer is fair enough, but is his crime technically any worse because of the circumstances? The judge seems to think so.

What would be the normal punishment for hacking an internet account and stealing videos worth a few quid?

12 months jail seems a bit excessive.
Seems right to me given the wider circumstances and the impact on the family. He'll be in a low sec prison after 3(?) months and out in 6.

Either way, not fit to be a police officer in any shape or form.

Pesty

42,655 posts

280 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
La Liga said:
t's a sudden, unnatural death so it must be reported to the coroner. The police act on behalf of the coroner during a sudden death and will complete a report for the coroner.

A suicide is usually treated as a crime scene until it's believed it is a suicide and nothing suspicious.

The body isn't being 'guarded' as such. It's for continuity between the police and people who will remove the body. There doesn't want to be a gap which can't be accounted for in case something is discovered later on. Whether that be cause / injuries / property going missing from the body etc.

There can also be delicate issues which need to be resolved i.e. the family won't want the child to be removed etc.
Thank you.

Makes sense.

anonymous-user

78 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
You're welcome.

XCP

17,610 posts

252 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
I never cease to be amazed by some of the ways that police officers find to press the career self destruct button.

peterperkins

3,354 posts

266 months

Thursday 5th September 2019
quotequote all
Total and utter scum bag offence which has rightly attracted a significant punishment.