Mt Snowdon Needs a McDonald's, Apparently.....
Mt Snowdon Needs a McDonald's, Apparently.....
Author
Discussion

Mort7

Original Poster:

1,487 posts

132 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/touri...

Made me laugh. Reminded me of a trip to the New Forest, courtesy of a binoculars manufacturer, to see Honey Buzzards. Part way through the guided tour, which involved quite a long trek through open countryside, one of the attendees, a large American woman, demanded to know where the bathroom was........

swamp

1,012 posts

213 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
Nothing in that article surprises me.

Last time I went up Snowdon we actually got a few laughs from strangers for being "all kitted out".

Near the top we passed people sheltering behind rocks from the (forecasted) 70mph wind and rain. Typically they were wearing jeans with a hooded sweatshirt. Mostly they just seemed bewildered by the conditions.

Wacky Racer

40,783 posts

271 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
That "review" has obviously been put on as a joke.


Hasn't it?

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

91 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
The Mcsnowden burger.

Anyone else laugh/suffer brain haemorrhage when researching places and reading reviews (I think it was Google not tripadvisor) at the amount of people who'll review a castle or suchlike tourist attractions and 9 tenths of the review is devoted to a thorough analysis of the fking on site tea shop? And leave like 2 stars because the fking carrot cake was dry or something. Ccnts.

pidsy

8,610 posts

181 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
I’m sure (hope) some of those reviews are wind-ups!

It’s not that steep but I guess the flip flop brigade in summer must think it’s a big hill then find it harder than they thought.

Did it myself in may - the weather was terrible and there was no view. Pretty much 50m vis all the way up. Even the train was cancelled that day.
Pyg track up, miners down.

Saw very few people but several of those I saw were out of their depth. It was mild with light rain at the bottom - snowing and -3 at the top.






Zoobeef

6,004 posts

182 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
I went up via the top of crib goch in December of 2016, we had boots and about 70-80lbs of kit each. There were walkers in jeans, a coat and trainers. Madness.

take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey

7,413 posts

79 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
I went up via the top of crib goch in December of 2016, we had boots and about 70-80lbs of kit each. There were walkers in jeans, a coat and trainers. Madness.
SAS selection? rofl

WTF were you carrying?




snuffy

12,569 posts

308 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey said:
Zoobeef said:
I went up via the top of crib goch in December of 2016, we had boots and about 70-80lbs of kit each. There were walkers in jeans, a coat and trainers. Madness.
SAS selection? rofl

WTF were you carrying?
A portable toilet as it turns out there are no traps at the top !

deckster

9,631 posts

279 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Of course. But 80lbs of gear is over 30kg each. Which is what you might expect for an expedition pack, but is a significant impediment if you're doing something as technical and potentially serious as Crib Goch. I'm the last to advocate going up into the hills unprepared but you have to be going some to pack 80lbs of kit for a day trip anywhere in the UK.

take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey

7,413 posts

79 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
80lbs over Crib is likely more hazard than help.

I'm ex mountain rescue so I fully endorse carrying the right kit, but I doubt I was humping 80lbs when wearing half a bell stretcher on my back + my personal kit.

That's an insane amount of weight even if your rocking crampons, axe, harness + climbing gear.

Zoobeef

6,004 posts

182 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
Marines mountain training. You take the kitchen sink, just in case.

take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey

7,413 posts

79 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
snuffy said:
A portable toilet as it turns out there are no traps at the top !
hehe

take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey

7,413 posts

79 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
Marines mountain training. You take the kitchen sink, just in case.
Ah... Booty training. That explains it.

Baby Shark doo doo doo doo

15,078 posts

193 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
I went up via the top of crib goch in December of 2016, we had boots and about 70-80lbs of kit each. There were walkers in jeans, a coat and trainers. Madness.
When we visited Snowdon a few summers back we encountered a few Essex lads and girls who were going up wearing jean shorts, vests, and flip flops. To their credit, they made it rofl

towser44

4,081 posts

139 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
Went up twice last year, once with my 7 year old daughter and unfit partner! They made it up, but were under no illusions how hard it would be and were prepared to turn around if needed. The second time I was on my own and about a mile from the car park on the way back down the Ranger Path I met a guy who was struggling even then, asking me if it was much further to the top. I pointed out that he had just done the easy bit and that it got much, much harder and there was still approx 3 miles to go. At which point he just said, ah, the wife might not make it then (she was even further back than him and was practically dying when I passed her!) and said he had been told this was the easy path. The amount of people who read 'easy path' and think it is just that, easy, is staggering, it's a 3500 foot mountain ffs!

matchmaker

8,970 posts

224 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
Quality Daily Star journalism:

"Others whinged about the lack of toilets on the 3,560ft peak, the highest after Ben Nevis."

And another 55 Scottish mountains...rolleyes

gazza285

10,929 posts

232 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
Snowdon has much more to offer than Skiddaw it would seem...

https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowUserReviews-g186...

Tripadvisor Idiot said:
Compared to Snowdon summit this is a weak and poorly developed visitor attraction. Snowdon has a funicular railway to carry people to the summit. At Snowdon summit there is an excellent visitor centre with the full range of facilities - and the whole operation attracts hundreds of thousands of visitors per year.

Ascending to the summit of Skiddaw is an exhausting experience on the basis that the only means to get up there is to walk. It is just too high and too steep for most people. How can the Lake District National Park people expect people to go up there?. Be warned that ... THERE ARE NO FACILITIES AT THE SUMMIT. If you actually make it to the summit and then need the toilet then that is just too bad!.

I visited the summit this last weekend and was very disappointed with the experience. There was sod all to see and do there. If people had to pay to go there then nobody, and I mean nobody, would bother with it. The National Park people should charge visitors £5 to go the summit and use the proceeds to develop it. Essentials include a proper visitor centre. Long to medium term, consideration should be given to building a funicular railway to Skiddaw summit.

Tankrizzo

7,949 posts

217 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
The first review quoted is so clearly a piss take. That makes me disregard the rest of the article as it's written by either a wind up merchant, or a monumental idiot taken in by joke reviews.

Oakey

27,970 posts

240 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
That Everest is st too, no cafe up there either. 1 out of 5 stars.

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

91 months

Wednesday 1st January 2020
quotequote all
gazza285 said:
Snowdon has much more to offer than Skiddaw it would seem...

https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/ShowUserReviews-g186...

Tripadvisor Idiot said:
Compared to Snowdon summit this is a weak and poorly developed visitor attraction. Snowdon has a funicular railway to carry people to the summit. At Snowdon summit there is an excellent visitor centre with the full range of facilities - and the whole operation attracts hundreds of thousands of visitors per year.

Ascending to the summit of Skiddaw is an exhausting experience on the basis that the only means to get up there is to walk. It is just too high and too steep for most people. How can the Lake District National Park people expect people to go up there?. Be warned that ... THERE ARE NO FACILITIES AT THE SUMMIT. If you actually make it to the summit and then need the toilet then that is just too bad!.

I visited the summit this last weekend and was very disappointed with the experience. There was sod all to see and do there. If people had to pay to go there then nobody, and I mean nobody, would bother with it. The National Park people should charge visitors £5 to go the summit and use the proceeds to develop it. Essentials include a proper visitor centre. Long to medium term, consideration should be given to building a funicular railway to Skiddaw summit.
they just don't read it back to themselves do they?