Daily mail vendetta against Prince Harry and Megan Markle?

[philv]

What has that vile st rag got against Prince Harry and Megan Markle?

No matter what they do, they get slated.

Today it reports on them doing charity work, with the snide remark of downgrading from a Porsche to a Cadalac.

It's been like this for months.

How they fly, what they drive, etc etc etc.

In the midst of all that is good in the uk, a prime example being Captain Tom Moore, is this beacon of steaming ste called the Daily Mail.

[hackjo]

It's because they're virtue signalling, self obsessed attention seekers.

And Meghan and Harry aren't much better.

[Sophisticated Sarah]

While some of their actions are hypocritical, flying to tell the plebs not to fly for example, the media do seem to hate them.

[DoubleD]

Read a different news paper, the problem will then go away.

[CoolHands]

They have. But so have most people who post on PH so you’ll get no sympathy here!

[powerstroke]

Gold digging control freak and little boy lost ,I just wish the media would stop giving them the oxygen of publicity ,
let them sort out the divorce when its time and he can rejoin the royal family ...

[philv]

Bit surprised by the comments here.

So, if they do something not limed it is ok to slate them.
If they do smooth good it is attention grabbing.


Unsurprising they moved to Canada really is it.

[DoubleD]

philv said:

Bit surprised by the comments here.

So, if they do something not limed it is ok to slate them.
If they do smooth good it is attention grabbing.

Im a bit surprised that anyone cares to be honest.

[philv]

DoubleD said:

philv said:

Bit surprised by the comments here.

So, if they do something not limed it is ok to slate them.
If they do smooth good it is attention grabbing.

Im a bit surprised that anyone cares to be honest.

I don't like to see people slated in the media for no reason.

[bitchstewie]

philv said:

Bit surprised by the comments here.

So, if they do something not limed it is ok to slate them.
If they do smooth good it is attention grabbing.


Unsurprising they moved to Canada really is it.

You've just summed up the mostly bile filled 190 page thread on them quite nicely.

Completely bizarre just how much some people seem to dislike them but I guess it takes all sorts.

[powerstroke]

philv said:

I don't like to see people slated in the media for no reason.

[DoubleD]

philv said:

DoubleD said:

philv said:

Bit surprised by the comments here.

So, if they do something not limed it is ok to slate them.
If they do smooth good it is attention grabbing.

Im a bit surprised that anyone cares to be honest.

I don't like to see people slated in the media for no reason.

Why do you read the Daily Mail if you hate it so much?

[Higgs boson]

philv said:

I don't like to see people slated in the media for no reason.

What, like doing "charity work" and having a photographer record it?
Not to mention the security personnel that will be there, too.

[anonymous-user]

Mail loves the royals.

Harry left the royals because he married a foreigner.

So it’s basically about a foreign woke woman messing up the royal family and making Harry woke too.

Plus Harry looks happy for once having left the U.K. and the media like the mail behind.

[Gilzean1]

philv said:

What has that vile st rag got against Prince Harry and Megan Markle?

No matter what they do, they get slated.

Today it reports on them doing charity work, with the snide remark of downgrading from a Porsche to a Cadalac.

It's been like this for months.

How they fly, what they drive, etc etc etc.

In the midst of all that is good in the uk, a prime example being Captain Tom Moore, is this beacon of steaming ste called Piers Morgan.

Apologies for the correction, but most of it comes from that direction which the Mail goes onto publish.

Morgan got sacked from one rag, to then be employed by a rag that is worse than the one that sacked him!

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2004/may/14/pres...

[powerstroke]

El stovey said:

Mail loves the royals.

Harry left the royals because he married a foreigner.

So it’s basically about a foreign woke woman messing up the royal family and making Harry woke too.

Plus Harry looks happy for once having left the U.K. and the media like the mail behind.

I think you will find its trapped wind , my guess is he wonders what the fk he has done !!!

[philv]

Higgs boson said:

philv said:

I don't like to see people slated in the media for no reason.

What, like doing "charity work" and having a photographer record it?
Not to mention the security personnel that will be there, too.

Of course, William and Kate don't have security guards or media representatives and photographers?

They don't get slated for it.

So... Your statement doesn't stack up.

You just don't like them i guess.

[anonymous-user]

powerstroke said:

I think you will find its trapped wind , my guess is he wonders what the fk he has done !!!

Basically the mail and readers are like a jilted wife whose husband has left them and the unhappy relationship and found happiness somewhere else and the bitter old wife is now saying you’ll miss me, you’ll regret it etc and scoffing at the ex husband’s new found young partner and new lease of life.

[Chedders]

The Daily Mail are proper weird about the Royals.

A couple of years ago they put up an article, it was top of their page, with loads of pictures of I think William and Kate having a bath together in the nude, the pictures were ofcourse an actor and an actress, but it was proper proper weird.

[DoubleD]

If you read the Daily Mail then you are making the problem worse, so stop reading it.