9 years for 80+ through a red light, drunk, killing two.
Discussion
Saweep said:
I've never been to prison. Although I feel like I'm in one of those open ones at the moment and it's only been 6 weeks.
When I stop and think about it, 4.5 years of this feeling seems like a very, very long time.
I have been to prison, but only for work reasons, and not to stay. I reckon that most of us would do our nut after a week or two there, let alone a year or more. When I stop and think about it, 4.5 years of this feeling seems like a very, very long time.
There is perhaps an argument for saying that anyone who takes a life should be deprived of liberty for the rest of their life, but it would be hard to fit such a rule justly to all circumstances, which can range from a deliberate and sadistic killing, through this sort of case of massive selfish irresponsibility, through to the one punch manslaughter or moment of carelessness sort of case. That's before you start talking about what resources society is willing to devote to incarceration.
Big-Bo-Beep said:
Shocking sentencing, I don't really know how bad an incident you need to cause to get a Life Ban these days.
Life bans can be counter productive.Once the person has served their sentence, they need to contribute to society.
Having a job is a good way to do this rather than be on benefits and be a burden to the public purse - having access to a vehicle is part of this.
Breadvan72 said:
Saweep said:
I've never been to prison. Although I feel like I'm in one of those open ones at the moment and it's only been 6 weeks.
When I stop and think about it, 4.5 years of this feeling seems like a very, very long time.
I have been to prison, but only for work reasons, and not to stay. I reckon that most of us would do our nut after a week or two there, let alone a year or more. When I stop and think about it, 4.5 years of this feeling seems like a very, very long time.
vaud said:
Life bans can be counter productive.
Once the person has served their sentence, they need to contribute to society.
Having a job is a good way to do this rather than be on benefits and be a burden to the public purse - having access to a vehicle is part of this.
I disagree. Mrs Calobra has never driven a car. Didn't stop her from working all her live in many cities.Once the person has served their sentence, they need to contribute to society.
Having a job is a good way to do this rather than be on benefits and be a burden to the public purse - having access to a vehicle is part of this.
Sa Calobra said:
I disagree. Mrs Calobra has never driven a car. Didn't stop her from working all her live in many cities.
That's fine if you live in a city. Many people don't.I'm fine for lengthy prison sentences. And even life bans for repeated serious offences.
But we have a system, much to NP&E's chagrin, of rehabilitation rather than lifelong punishment and hard labour.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


