SNP MP travels to and from Parliament with Covid-19
Discussion
Completely fool! She needs to be sacked.
The first trip down whilst awaiting results one could perhaps understand even if very wrong.
The trip up north in public transport AFTER knowing she was positive has no defense.
Let’s see how good the SNP is now. I don’t think there is any other option but sacking.
The first trip down whilst awaiting results one could perhaps understand even if very wrong.
The trip up north in public transport AFTER knowing she was positive has no defense.
Let’s see how good the SNP is now. I don’t think there is any other option but sacking.
NNH said:
Jimboka said:
No apologies will save her career
What a fool..
True, but that's because an SNP politician's career is never in danger, no matter what they do.What a fool..
Come join the Scottish Referendum / Independence thread (Vol 9) and you can read all about SNP politicians grooming schoolchildren, driving without insurance while holding the position of Transport Minister, making racist comments to BBC presenters, condemning UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia while themselves profiting from US sales of WMAs, or lying on record within the their parliament chamber while holding the position of First Minister (plus a lot more) - all still in a job with scant likelihood they will lose it.
Welcome to Scotland (unless you are English, of course).
Edited by Evercross on Thursday 1st October 19:25
Staggering that she is still in post despite putting her name to this early day motion in Parliament...
early day motion said:
That this House calls on the Prime Minister to seek the immediate resignation of his chief adviser, Mr Dominic Cummings; notes with concern the damage Mr Cummings' breach of clear lockdown rules during the Covid-19 pandemic has done to public health advice and public confidence in it; further notes that other senior public employees have resigned or been removed for similar breaches of lockdown rules; and further calls on the Cabinet Secretary to conduct a swift inquiry into the sanctioning of this breach of lockdown rules and any measures taken within government to restrict full transparency on this matter; concludes that there cannot be one rule for the Prime Minister’s senior advisers and separate rules for everyone else
biggbn said:
Surely those who sprang to defend Dom and the other Tories who broke lockdown will spring to her defence?
There's definitely hypocrisy on both sides. I personally think he should have been sacked, as should this woman here.Some people tried to excuse Cumming's retention because he wasn't an MP and "just an advisor" which was nonsense imho. Either you're a public figure whith a large degree of responsibility whose behaviour will set expectations to the general public, or you're not...
biggbn said:
Surely those who sprang to defend Dom and the other Tories who broke lockdown will spring to her defence?
There's definitely hypocrisy on both sides. I personally think he should have been sacked, as should this woman here.Some people tried to excuse Cumming's retention because he wasn't an MP and "just an advisor" which was nonsense imho. Either you're a public figure with a large degree of responsibility whose behaviour will set expectations to the general public, or you're not...
Edited by IamJacksContempt on Thursday 1st October 19:30
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





ktard
