/r/ukpolitics goes private over pedo enabler reddit employee
Discussion
Title clickbaity enough for ya? 
Today, people noticed that /r/ukpolitics has gone private -
What's all this about, then?
This story is about Aimee Challenor
/r/ukpolitics is private because references to this person are resulting in permanent bans for users
Christ, what a f
king mess. These people walk amongst us.
Today, people noticed that /r/ukpolitics has gone private -
What's all this about, then?
This story is about Aimee Challenor
substack said:
In August 2018 Aimee's father, David Challenor, was found guilty of torturing and raping a 10-year-old girl in the attic of the family's Coventry home. Images of child abuse, including photographs of Challenor and his victim, were found in the house and on Challenor’s computer and camera.
It emerged that Challenor senior committed his crimes while dressed as a little girl, wearing baby-doll dresses and nappies.
David Challenor was Aimee's election agent when Aimee stood as a Green Party candidate for Coventry South in 2017 and during the 2018 local elections. Aimee appointed him after his arrest for the crimes which now see him serving a 22-year prison sentence.
It emerged that Challenor senior committed his crimes while dressed as a little girl, wearing baby-doll dresses and nappies.
David Challenor was Aimee's election agent when Aimee stood as a Green Party candidate for Coventry South in 2017 and during the 2018 local elections. Aimee appointed him after his arrest for the crimes which now see him serving a 22-year prison sentence.
substack said:
After leaving the Green Party—accusing them of ‘transphobia’ on the way out of the door— Aimee joined the Liberal Democrats where history quickly repeated itself. The Lib-Dems launched an investigation into a whole new safeguarding concern.
This time, the alarm was sounded over Aimee's American fiancé (now husband), Nathaniel Knight, and his sexual fantasies involving children.
Since being kicked out of Stonewall, the Green party, and then the Liberal Democrats, they have been employed by Reddit and are now a site administrator.This time, the alarm was sounded over Aimee's American fiancé (now husband), Nathaniel Knight, and his sexual fantasies involving children.
/r/ukpolitics is private because references to this person are resulting in permanent bans for users
Christ, what a f
king mess. These people walk amongst us.That’s a very long wall of words which basically seems to come down to:
Intentionally miss gendering someone (something that does not help any argument)
Thinking that group mods are employed by Reddit
Guilt by association
General “ew that’s icky”.
More than happy to be corrected, but is there anything to say that she has possibly done anything illegal? I have scanned through but CBA to read through what appears to be a rambling blog by a bigot with a chip on their shoulder.
Intentionally miss gendering someone (something that does not help any argument)
Thinking that group mods are employed by Reddit
Guilt by association
General “ew that’s icky”.
More than happy to be corrected, but is there anything to say that she has possibly done anything illegal? I have scanned through but CBA to read through what appears to be a rambling blog by a bigot with a chip on their shoulder.
Electro1980 said:
That’s a very long wall of words which basically seems to come down to:
Intentionally miss gendering someone (something that does not help any argument)
Thinking that group mods are employed by Reddit
Guilt by association
General “ew that’s icky”.
More than happy to be corrected, but is there anything to say that she has possibly done anything illegal? I have scanned through but CBA to read through what appears to be a rambling blog by a bigot with a chip on their shoulder.
They are employed by reddit, that's the crux of the story. Moderators can ban you from a sub, admins can ban your entire account, which is what has been happening when people reference this person, hence the lockdown of ukpolitics.Intentionally miss gendering someone (something that does not help any argument)
Thinking that group mods are employed by Reddit
Guilt by association
General “ew that’s icky”.
More than happy to be corrected, but is there anything to say that she has possibly done anything illegal? I have scanned through but CBA to read through what appears to be a rambling blog by a bigot with a chip on their shoulder.
It does trans people no justice to protect scum from legitimate criticism by allowing them to use transphobia as a shield. It's an affront to all the normal trans people, frankly.
amusingduck said:
/r/ukpolitics is private because references to this person are resulting in permanent bans for users
Christ, what a fking mess. These people walk amongst us.
Waiting for the ‘just to clear up what happened’ post, coming in the next few hours. Probably slightly harder to word than when the WSB coup was fixed. Christ, what a f
king mess. These people walk amongst us.What is most concerning about this is indeed the complete lack of attention given to this person's background. There is of course the premise that you cannot be declaring people guilty by association but there is a deep and dangerous lack of diligence around what this person subsequently has access to. The first time you can potentially declare it as trying to repair that relationship (I don't know about any of you but I won't speak to my father for a lot less than torturing and raping a ten year old girl he suspended from the ceiling) but how do you excuse the subsequent "lapses in judgement".
This individual is an enabler, at the very least. And that's being exceptionally generous.
This individual is an enabler, at the very least. And that's being exceptionally generous.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff