London Mayoral election.
Discussion
Countdown said:
That guy is a bell end of epic proportions, not Khans biggest fan but he's a million times betterMonkeyMatt said:
Countdown said:
That guy is a bell end of epic proportions, not Khans biggest fan but he's a million times betterpaulrockliffe said:
With 23% of the vote counted Khan and Bailey are both on 38%. This seems unlikely, but has at least piqued my interest.
I think the first two wards were Tory strongholds so it's not surprising that Bailey took an early lead. Still, it'll be good if can give Kahn a bit of run as he seems to me to be a very ineffective mayor. BoJo was good at branding London and promoting it globally. Much to my surprise he was really good at that.
I haven't got a clue what Kahn stands for or believes in. Or what he thinks London is or could be. A major disappointment.
AC43 said:
BoJo was good at branding London and promoting it globally. Much to my surprise he was really good at that.
I haven't got a clue what Kahn stands for or believes in. Or what he thinks London is or could be. A major disappointment.
What does that first bit even mean? And what noticeable difference does someone as irrelevant as London Mayor make to anything outside of London itself?I haven't got a clue what Kahn stands for or believes in. Or what he thinks London is or could be. A major disappointment.
Re the latter, I imagine you'd find out if you looked.
AC43 said:
I think the first two wards were Tory strongholds so it's not surprising that Bailey took an early lead.
Still, it'll be good if can give Kahn a bit of run as he seems to me to be a very ineffective mayor. BoJo was good at branding London and promoting it globally. Much to my surprise he was really good at that.
I haven't got a clue what Kahn stands for or believes in. Or what he thinks London is or could be. A major disappointment.
Bojo was (is) good at promoting one thing only; himself. The fact that he was LM at the time was incidental.Still, it'll be good if can give Kahn a bit of run as he seems to me to be a very ineffective mayor. BoJo was good at branding London and promoting it globally. Much to my surprise he was really good at that.
I haven't got a clue what Kahn stands for or believes in. Or what he thinks London is or could be. A major disappointment.
okgo said:
AC43 said:
BoJo was good at branding London and promoting it globally. Much to my surprise he was really good at that.
What does that first bit even mean? okgo said:
And what noticeable difference does someone as irrelevant as London Mayor make to anything outside of London itself?
I don't give a s
t about what anyone outside London thinks abut who is or isn't mayor here but you are welcome to the vast tax surplus that gets spread across the rest of the country.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff








