NHS Big Data Grab
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

78 months

Thursday 13th May 2021
quotequote all
Saw this on the register site, people maybe interested in what will happen to all their medical histories/data in a few weeks.

https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/13/nhs_data_gr...

Opt out online https://www.nhs.uk/your-nhs-data-matters/manage-yo...

Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 13th May 22:18

105.4

4,214 posts

95 months

Thursday 13th May 2021
quotequote all
Thanks for the heads-up.

I’m sure there’s absolutely nothing to worry about. Government agencies are 100% always so very careful with our most sensitive and private information......

Oh. getmecoat

miniman

29,388 posts

286 months

Thursday 13th May 2021
quotequote all
Am I alone in being moderately surprised that my patient records aren’t *already* stored centrally somewhere? Not sure I see the issue.

Penelope Stopit

11,209 posts

133 months

Thursday 13th May 2021
quotequote all
NHS Digital said names and addresses, written notes, images, letters, and documents would not be collected

scrw.

3,085 posts

214 months

Thursday 13th May 2021
quotequote all
Gold dust for insurance companies, if they get their hands on it they will be working hard to work out who is actually who within the data

souper

2,457 posts

235 months

Thursday 13th May 2021
quotequote all
Thanks for the heads up, just opted out thumbup

rxe

6,700 posts

127 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
Storm, meet teacup.

Anyone who has worked with the civil service knows that they tie themselves in knots about data sharing, and generally make the data entirely useless before releasing it. They aren’t going to be selling your medical records to insurance companies.

Who bloody cares if Microsoft release a load of machine learning on it and can come up with something interesting? I was just reading an article about fat teenagers having a higher risk of stroke in later life - well here’s the data set that can prove or disprove that notion. It would be quite handy to be able to predict outcomes and treat people before they lost the use of their brains.

If I was in charge of the NHS, I’d make it simple, your data belongs to the NHS, if you don’t like it, fk off to the private hospital down the road.



Edited by rxe on Friday 14th May 01:09

DukeDickson

4,762 posts

237 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
rxe said:
Storm, meet teacup.

If I was in charge of the NHS, I’d make it simple, your data belongs to the NHS, if you don’t like it, fk off to the private hospital down the road.
Would you still expect those that did to pay their share?

rxe

6,700 posts

127 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
DukeDickson said:
Would you still expect those that did to pay their share?
Yes, just like I pay for other government provided stuff I don’t use.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

78 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
Penelope Stopit said:
NHS Digital said names and addresses, written notes, images, letters, and documents would not be collected
Yet people don't want 'their' data being shared. It is moronic and i'm sure they will spiel off the same BS, most likely antivax, big conspiracy people.

i have zero issue with sharing anonymised data, i have a rare medical condition that hopefully sharing my data would help others. i already feed back my data to pharmaceuticals, doctors anyway, because in my eyes my self importance is not as great as helping others.

Terminator X

19,634 posts

228 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
rxe said:
Storm, meet teacup.

Anyone who has worked with the civil service knows that they tie themselves in knots about data sharing, and generally make the data entirely useless before releasing it. They aren’t going to be selling your medical records to insurance companies.

Who bloody cares if Microsoft release a load of machine learning on it and can come up with something interesting? I was just reading an article about fat teenagers having a higher risk of stroke in later life - well here’s the data set that can prove or disprove that notion. It would be quite handy to be able to predict outcomes and treat people before they lost the use of their brains.

If I was in charge of the NHS, I’d make it simple, your data belongs to the NHS, if you don’t like it, fk off to the private hospital down the road.



Edited by rxe on Friday 14th May 01:09
Can we take our NHS payments with us?

Lol'ing at the usual tts just giving everything away. Nothing to see here!

TX.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

78 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
Can we take our NHS payments with us?

Lol'ing at the usual tts just giving everything away. Nothing to see here!

TX.
What are you giving away? Because I've seen nothing that indicates that you give anything away?

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

194 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
They're welcome to mine.

It's not exactly interesting reading.


Electro1980

8,931 posts

163 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
This is not new information. El Reg are living up to their red top cliche.

This is none identifiable data that will be used for big data analysis for groups like this: https://www.bdi.ox.ac.uk/

It will be used for things like identifying if there are particular patterns that identify heart attack risk early, or unexpected links that humans would never see, for example if having chicken pox early reduces the risk of some type of cancer or having a vaccination has any very long term effects.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

78 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
Those susceptible to fear will rightly be fearful of anything with big words, and rightly they can opt out of it to make them feel like they are in control of their anonymised data lol. All doing this whilst carrying a phone everyday yet miss the irony of it all.

We live in a world nowadays where we are looked upon as not individuals but part of data pools.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

220 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
I know only one person who is seriously concerned about data selling and she is a fully fledged, covid conspiracy, anti-vax, great barrington decelerating fruit loop nut job.

The rest of us couldn't give a ste.

bigandclever

14,221 posts

262 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
The NHS has been selling anonymised data for a while. What this ‘new’ thing means would be a richer data set that makes it even easier to reconstruct the data back to the individual.

grumbledoak

32,397 posts

257 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
bigandclever said:
The NHS has been selling anonymised data for a while. What this ‘new’ thing means would be a richer data set that makes it even easier to reconstruct the data back to the individual.
yes One medical condition and a postcode.

Big data is the new gold rush.

dcb

6,038 posts

289 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
105.4 said:
Thanks for the heads-up.

I’m sure there’s absolutely nothing to worry about. Government agencies are 100% always so very careful with our most sensitive and private information......

Oh. getmecoat
+1

The UK Government has shown many times that it couldn't organise a beer drinking competition
in a brewery and usually spends billions in doing so.

I've never understood why UK Gov is in the health care business.


oddman

3,890 posts

276 months

Friday 14th May 2021
quotequote all
The folk who didn't sign up to data sharing between hospitals (consent was sought a long time ago - at least a decade) make life difficult for themselves

If you agree to data sharing I (mental health trust doctor) can see what is in the letters on your acute hospital records and all blood tests, radiology pathology and a summary of GP records. If you didn't I can only see what is recorded within our Trust.

It's highly unlikley that if I requested the paper records form the general hospital that they would have all this information filed as almost everything is electronic record now.

It is possible to 'break glass' in urgent circumstances to see what information is there but this is supposed to be exceptional and you have to make an entry justifying the data breach

So those who didn't agree to data sharing are making life more difficult for professionals and at a population level incurring risk

Even though our patients have mental health problems, the ones who didn't sign up for data sharing tend to be of the 'tinfoil hat' variety. Most are sensible.

Sharing 'big data' could be enormously beneficial in terms of research, planning etc.