Ex-US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld dead at 88
Ex-US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld dead at 88
Author
Discussion

Origin Unknown

Original Poster:

2,459 posts

193 months

Wednesday 30th June 2021
quotequote all
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-5767411...

Not to detract from the work that he did, but when I think Donald Rumsfeld, I think.


ReallyReallyGood

1,641 posts

154 months

Wednesday 30th June 2021
quotequote all
He will live in immortality for giving us known unknowns and unknown unknowns.

mko9

2,916 posts

236 months

Wednesday 30th June 2021
quotequote all
ReallyReallyGood said:
He will live in immortality for giving us known unknowns and unknown unknowns.
Which was an incredibly insightful statement that sailed right over the heads of the Democrats and the media at the time. I blew my wind that people were mocking him as if he had said something stupid.

glazbagun

15,167 posts

221 months

Wednesday 30th June 2021
quotequote all
And of course for sending thousands of Americans to die for a bullst war.

Tom Logan

3,872 posts

149 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
[quote=glazbagun]And of course for sending thousands of Americans to die for a bullst war.[/quote

Beelzebub will be stoking the furnace up tonight.

No great loss to humanity.

JagLover

46,166 posts

259 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
mko9 said:
ReallyReallyGood said:
He will live in immortality for giving us known unknowns and unknown unknowns.
Which was an incredibly insightful statement that sailed right over the heads of the Democrats and the media at the time. I blew my wind that people were mocking him as if he had said something stupid.
Yep

Perhaps why most politicians talk in clichés and slogans. If they actually say anything insightful then that is the reaction.

KAgantua

5,102 posts

155 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
Rot in hell

ettore

4,942 posts

276 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
KAgantua said:
Rot in hell
What did he do to you?

Supercilious Sid

2,698 posts

185 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
ettore said:
KAgantua said:
Rot in hell
What did he do to you?
Don't hold your breath for an informed answer.

mrtwisty

3,057 posts

189 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
An appalling human being.

Penelope Stopit

11,209 posts

133 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
Tom Logan]lazbagun said:
And of course for sending thousands of Americans to die for a bullst war.[/quote

Beelzebub will be stoking the furnace up tonight.

No great loss to humanity.
The bravery of being out of range



andyA700

3,452 posts

61 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
KAgantua said:
Rot in hell
I second that sentiment. He was responsible for helping the Iraqis carry out chemical weapons attacks against the Iranians and Kurds, then was influential in the killing of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis from 2003 onwards. You can add Cheney, Bush, Wolfowitz and Blair to that list.

coppernorks

1,919 posts

70 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
And of course for sending thousands of Americans to die for a bullst war.
Leftie garbage.

That decision was taken by the commander in chief.

Politicians have sent young men to bullst wars for centuries, what was so evil about
Donald compared to Chamberlain, Roosevelt or Wilson ?

AW111

9,674 posts

157 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
coppernorks said:
glazbagun said:
And of course for sending thousands of Americans to die for a bullst war.
Leftie garbage.

That decision was taken by the commander in chief.

Politicians have sent young men to bullst wars for centuries, what was so evil about
Donald compared to Chamberlain, Roosevelt or Wilson ?
Why pick Chamberlain - what "bullst war" was he involved in?


hidetheelephants

33,963 posts

217 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
He was intrinsically involved in all the really terrible choices made concerning Iraq; not having a plan, appointing that asshat Bremer, expecting the civpop to welcome them as liberating victors like the French in 1944, sacking the entire army, sacking all senior civil servants. He made some st decisions about the actual invasion bit, but that was a mere warm-up for the horlicks he helped to create in the aftermath. Terrible SecDef.

Edited by hidetheelephants on Thursday 1st July 14:39

Countdown

47,544 posts

220 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
coppernorks said:
glazbagun said:
And of course for sending thousands of Americans to die for a bullst war.
Leftie garbage.

That decision was taken by the commander in chief.

Politicians have sent young men to bullst wars for centuries, what was so evil about
Donald compared to Chamberlain, Roosevelt or Wilson ?
In very simple terms the choices faced by Roosevelt and Chamberlain were far more limited than those faced by the NeoCons. The latter group chose to invade Iraq when there was no military reason to do so and because they thought it would be a military walkover. As a result of this hundreds of thousands of people ended up dying and the fallout from their decision will last for decades.

Randy Winkman

20,990 posts

213 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
JagLover said:
mko9 said:
ReallyReallyGood said:
He will live in immortality for giving us known unknowns and unknown unknowns.
Which was an incredibly insightful statement that sailed right over the heads of the Democrats and the media at the time. I blew my wind that people were mocking him as if he had said something stupid.
Yep

Perhaps why most politicians talk in clichés and slogans. If they actually say anything insightful then that is the reaction.
Is this one a cliche/slogan or insightful?

Rumsfeld on Osama Bin Laden:

"He's therefore either alive and well, or alive and not too well, or not alive."




mko9

2,916 posts

236 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
However screwed up the plan was for Iraq, Donald Rumsfeld didn't force al-Qaeda, ISIS, Shia militant groups, Iranian proxy forces, etc to slaughter hundreds of thousands of their fellow country-persons. The majority of the death and depravity was perpetrated by the people who already lived there, against their own people.

Countdown

47,544 posts

220 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
mko9 said:
However screwed up the plan was for Iraq, Donald Rumsfeld didn't force al-Qaeda, ISIS, Shia militant groups, Iranian proxy forces, etc to slaughter hundreds of thousands of their fellow country-persons. The majority of the death and depravity was perpetrated by the people who already lived there, against their own people.
You're conflating17 different issues. I don't think anybody has suggested that Rumsy was responsible for ISIS, Shia militant groups, Iranian proxy forces (although it could be argued that invading Afghanistan and Iraq created the instability which resulted in numerous armed groups being created).

However, having said that, one of the reasons that Saddam was tolerated, armed and funded by the West and by the Sunni countries in the Middle East was because he was a useful buffer against Shia Iran. Toppling him made Iran much stronger than it was previously. Iraq is now effectively a Shia-led country and it's created a Shia crescent from Iran all the way to Lebanon. It's the law of unintended consequences, and one of many resulting from US interference.



Tom Logan

3,872 posts

149 months

Thursday 1st July 2021
quotequote all
andyA700 said:
I second that sentiment. He was responsible for helping the Iraqis carry out chemical weapons attacks against the Iranians and Kurds, then was influential in the killing of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis from 2003 onwards. You can add Cheney, Bush, Wolfowitz and Blair to that list.
Don't forget Coa-lin Powell and that bint whose name sounds like a pot noodle.