Nuclear Boar-Pigs
Discussion
Looks like there's a new species created out of the wreckage of Fukushima - interesting to see Darwinism in action:
https://metro.co.uk/2021/06/30/wild-pig-boar-hybri...
https://metro.co.uk/2021/06/30/wild-pig-boar-hybri...
Misleading thread title. The article makes it 100% clear that this was just natural cross-breeding and nothing to do with radioactive mutation, so 'nuclear' has nothing to do with it.
Well done for the clickbait though. 'Escaped pigs breed with wild boars' doesn't make it sound nearly as sci-fi.
Well done for the clickbait though. 'Escaped pigs breed with wild boars' doesn't make it sound nearly as sci-fi.
Edited by Evercross on Thursday 1st July 08:48
Evercross said:
Misleading thread title. The article makes it100% clear that this was just natural cross-breeding and nothing to do with radioactive mutation.
Well done for the clickbait though.
Apologies for the misleading title - pedantry matters!Well done for the clickbait though.
I suppose its still the result of radioactivity, as humans were forced out & nature took over....
Evercross said:
Misleading thread title. The article makes it 100% clear that this was just natural cross-breeding and nothing to do with radioactive mutation, so 'nuclear' has nothing to do with it.
Well done for the clickbait though. 'Escaped pigs breed with wild boars' doesn't make it sound nearly as sci-fi.
Well done for the clickbait though. 'Escaped pigs breed with wild boars' doesn't make it sound nearly as sci-fi.
Edited by Evercross on Thursday 1st July 08:48
Any of these spotted?
JagLover said:
Not nearly as impressive as Man-Bear-Pig
Which was supposed to be an allegory for the climate change scare.
Going back to the article, if anything it underlines the stupidity of the notion that 'humans are destroying the planet' and highlights the opposite. Two man-made disasters (Fukushima and Chernobyl) result in two large areas of habitat being abandoned to nature, which thrive and adapt as a result.
IMO the XR and climate change mob are the ultimate in conceit, believing in the notion that a species that has existed on this planet for a microcosm of its history (ie. us) are somehow in complete control of it. If anything it will be the planet and nature taking us out eventually, and not the other way around.
Edited by Evercross on Thursday 1st July 09:09
Evercross said:
Going back to the article, if anything it underlines the stupidity of the notion that 'humans are destroying the planet' and highlights the opposite. Two man-made disasters (Fukushima and Chernobyl) result in two large areas of habitat being abandoned to nature, which thrive and adapt as a result.
That's quite a take Edited by Evercross on Thursday 1st July 09:09
Like a bully who forces you to get tougher so you can beat them up.
The cross breeding of domestic and wild animals does cause issues. Part of the reason the Scottish Wildcat is going extinct is because they keep breeding with domestic cats, weakening their own genetics.
ZedLeg said:
That's quite a take
Like a bully who forces you to get tougher so you can beat them up.
The cross breeding of domestic and wild animals does cause issues. Part of the reason the Scottish Wildcat is going extinct is because they keep breeding with domestic cats, weakening their own genetics.
It's not just the wildcat... It's a view shared by most Scotch-people about inter-breeding with the English.Like a bully who forces you to get tougher so you can beat them up.
The cross breeding of domestic and wild animals does cause issues. Part of the reason the Scottish Wildcat is going extinct is because they keep breeding with domestic cats, weakening their own genetics.
Coming up here and giving us a higher UV tolerance.
take-good-care-of-the-forest-dewey said:
ZedLeg said:
That's quite a take
Like a bully who forces you to get tougher so you can beat them up.
The cross breeding of domestic and wild animals does cause issues. Part of the reason the Scottish Wildcat is going extinct is because they keep breeding with domestic cats, weakening their own genetics.
It's not just the wildcat... It's a view shared by most Scotch-people about inter-breeding with the English. Like a bully who forces you to get tougher so you can beat them up.
The cross breeding of domestic and wild animals does cause issues. Part of the reason the Scottish Wildcat is going extinct is because they keep breeding with domestic cats, weakening their own genetics.
Sort of misleading too, in that domestic pigs when set loose into the wild will quickly go feral (which changes some aspects of physical appearance) and revert back to a boar-like physical appearance in just a few generations.
So even without the presence of a wild boar population, a wild domestic population, if robust enough, would have provided a similar outcome.
Which is different to the Scottish wildcats example above.
So even without the presence of a wild boar population, a wild domestic population, if robust enough, would have provided a similar outcome.
Which is different to the Scottish wildcats example above.
Pixelpeep Z4 said:
Please, share your alternative version?
That's for a different thread. I'm pretty sure though that even the MSM is accepting now that CV-19 was more likely lab-created in China, but it was a bit embarrassing for everyone involved to admit it because some high-profile Americans were funding the 'gain of function' research into artificially enhanced viruses against US Government policy regarding working with China.Not a conspiracy BTW, just an embarrassing and irresponsible chain of events that the 'bat/pangolin eating' theory does a good job of making sure there is plausible deniability.
Evanivitch said:
Sort of misleading too, in that domestic pigs when set loose into the wild will quickly go feral (which changes some aspects of physical appearance) and revert back to a boar-like physical appearance in just a few generations.
So even without the presence of a wild boar population, a wild domestic population, if robust enough, would have provided a similar outcome.
Which is different to the Scottish wildcats example above.
Is that correct? My understanding of this is if you leave a population of cats alone long enough, they revert to tabby, not unlike the wild cat.So even without the presence of a wild boar population, a wild domestic population, if robust enough, would have provided a similar outcome.
Which is different to the Scottish wildcats example above.
Evercross said:
That's for a different thread. I'm pretty sure though that even the MSM is accepting now that CV-19 was more likely lab-created in China, but it was a bit embarrassing for everyone involved to admit it because some high-profile Americans were funding the 'gain of function' research into artificially enhanced viruses against US Government policy regarding working with China.
Not a conspiracy BTW, just an embarrassing and irresponsible chain of events that the 'bat/pangolin eating' theory does a good job of making sure there is plausible deniability.
If it wasn't a lab leak it sure is one hell of a coincidence that the outbreak started a few hundred metres from a lab studying these viruses and working on them. Not a conspiracy BTW, just an embarrassing and irresponsible chain of events that the 'bat/pangolin eating' theory does a good job of making sure there is plausible deniability.
JagLover said:
Evercross said:
That's for a different thread. I'm pretty sure though that even the MSM is accepting now that CV-19 was more likely lab-created in China, but it was a bit embarrassing for everyone involved to admit it because some high-profile Americans were funding the 'gain of function' research into artificially enhanced viruses against US Government policy regarding working with China.
Not a conspiracy BTW, just an embarrassing and irresponsible chain of events that the 'bat/pangolin eating' theory does a good job of making sure there is plausible deniability.
If it wasn't a lab leak it sure is one hell of a coincidence that the outbreak started a few hundred metres from a lab studying these viruses and working on them. Not a conspiracy BTW, just an embarrassing and irresponsible chain of events that the 'bat/pangolin eating' theory does a good job of making sure there is plausible deniability.
Evercross said:
JagLover said:
Evercross said:
That's for a different thread. I'm pretty sure though that even the MSM is accepting now that CV-19 was more likely lab-created in China, but it was a bit embarrassing for everyone involved to admit it because some high-profile Americans were funding the 'gain of function' research into artificially enhanced viruses against US Government policy regarding working with China.
Not a conspiracy BTW, just an embarrassing and irresponsible chain of events that the 'bat/pangolin eating' theory does a good job of making sure there is plausible deniability.
If it wasn't a lab leak it sure is one hell of a coincidence that the outbreak started a few hundred metres from a lab studying these viruses and working on them. Not a conspiracy BTW, just an embarrassing and irresponsible chain of events that the 'bat/pangolin eating' theory does a good job of making sure there is plausible deniability.
As the qoute goes though - rumour will have gone round the world twice before truth has got its shoes on.
Evercross said:
Misleading thread title. The article makes it 100% clear that this was just natural cross-breeding and nothing to do with radioactive mutation, so 'nuclear' has nothing to do with it.
Well done for the clickbait though. 'Escaped pigs breed with wild boars' doesn't make it sound nearly as sci-fi.
I, for one, as a fan of the computer game STALKER refute your response and they really are Russian Nuclear pig mutants. Well done for the clickbait though. 'Escaped pigs breed with wild boars' doesn't make it sound nearly as sci-fi.
Edited by Evercross on Thursday 1st July 08:48
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff