Drug-driver left nurse with severe brain damage avoids jail
Drug-driver left nurse with severe brain damage avoids jail
Author
Discussion

Pixelpeep Z4

Original Poster:

8,600 posts

166 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
This is such a sad and crazy story.. how the hell did they not get sent down?

https://metro.co.uk/2021/06/18/drug-driver-who-lef...

vonhosen

40,597 posts

241 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
She did, but it was suspended.

The Vambo

7,393 posts

165 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
Pixelpeep Z4 said:
This is such a sad and crazy story.. how the hell did they not get sent down?

https://metro.co.uk/2021/06/18/drug-driver-who-lef...
My friend was killed by dangerous driving, last car in a traffic jam and they just drove straight into her and broke her neck.

Fined £500 and banned for 6 months. You'd get that for having a pint.

Don Roque

18,227 posts

183 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
That sentence is pathetic. These weak judges are failing the public.

Swervin_Mervin

4,884 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
Because woman.

PurpleTurtle

8,676 posts

168 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
Tests found her blood contained 186mg of benzoylecgonine, a by-product taking of cocaine two days earlier, the court heard. The legal limit is 50mg.

Two days earlier? Chinny reck-on!

Surely that is a blatant lie?

I have no experience of cocaine, but I know it's a widespread recreational drug. Surely if that amount was still in your system - nearly four times the legal limit - then loads of recreational weekend drug users would be getting nicked left, right and centre every day of the week?

I think she's told a whopper here and was more likely coked off here head, hence the speeding. Should be behind bars.


anonymous-user

78 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
Doesn’t seem like a lie, motoring solicitor website says:

Benzoylecgonine is detectable in your blood within 30 minutes of cocaine consumption. This amount will then rise gradually over the next 2 – 3 hours. So, if you were to ‘sniff’ a 35mg line of cocaine at 10:00pm, Benzoylecgonine would be detectable by 10:30pm. By 01:30am, this will have rose to 130 micrograms (the legal limit is 50 micrograms).

Cocaine is eliminated from your blood within 4 – 6 hours, whereas benzoylecgonine can be present for up to 6 days after administration.

p4cks

7,350 posts

223 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
charltjr said:
By 01:30am, this will have rose to 130 micrograms (the legal limit is 50 micrograms).
Risen.

A solicitor should really have better grammar on their website.

Sheepshanks

39,366 posts

143 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
I know it doesn't change anything, but this was a month ago?


In another recent car related case a mechanic who detained a guy damaging cars, who asphyxiated while waiting for the police, has been jailed for 3yrs. The garage owner commited suidide before the trial.

Vickers_VC10

6,759 posts

229 months

Wednesday 14th July 2021
quotequote all
Swervin_Mervin said:
Because woman.
This.

Pixelpeep Z4

Original Poster:

8,600 posts

166 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Vickers_VC10 said:
Swervin_Mervin said:
Because woman.
This.
is there a history of more leniency with female criminals ?

If so, we should have argued for keeping the pay gap.. surely this means we're equal ? biggrin

otolith

65,565 posts

228 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Seems lenient compared to what happened to 10 Pence Short.

Evanivitch

25,927 posts

146 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
I know it doesn't change anything, but this was a month ago?


In another recent car related case a mechanic who detained a guy damaging cars, who asphyxiated while waiting for the police, has been jailed for 3yrs. The garage owner commited suidide before the trial.
Well yeah, killing people for minor property damage is against the law.

Zetec-S

6,652 posts

117 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
I've always been of the opinion prison should be used for one of 2 things:

a) to protect the public
b) for punishment*

(* not revenge)

Obviously if something like this happened to someone close to me I'd be advocating all sorts of harsh punishments, but that's why the legal system if designed to be fair and impartial (even if it doesn't always look that way).

In this case, would sending her to prison be protecting the public? I doubt it, she is probably genuinely remorseful, with a driving ban and rehabilitation she will hopefully not repeat the same mistakes.

Sending her to prison as punishment - what does that achieve? She's obviously a "damaged" person, handing down a custodial sentence is probably going to compound that damage and make it harder for her to fit into society? If you do want to hand out a punishment then maybe a long term or even lifelong driving ban would be more appropriate?

(just my ramblings, appreciate this is PH and I'll be picked apart and flamed wink)

amusingduck

9,630 posts

160 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
charltjr said:
Doesn’t seem like a lie, motoring solicitor website says:

Benzoylecgonine is detectable in your blood within 30 minutes of cocaine consumption. This amount will then rise gradually over the next 2 – 3 hours. So, if you were to ‘sniff’ a 35mg line of cocaine at 10:00pm, Benzoylecgonine would be detectable by 10:30pm. By 01:30am, this will have rose to 130 micrograms (the legal limit is 50 micrograms).

Cocaine is eliminated from your blood within 4 – 6 hours, whereas benzoylecgonine can be present for up to 6 days after administration.
sciencedirect said:
Parent cocaine (pharmacologically active) and its major metabolite, benzoylecgonine (BZE) (pharmacologically inactive), are both of interest in oral fluid drug testing.
On that basis, it doesn't seem like she was drug driving at the time of the incident.

Evanivitch

25,927 posts

146 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
amusingduck said:
On that basis, it doesn't seem like she was drug driving at the time of the incident.
The judge even says the drugs were not part of the cause.

"The judge said that while Cassidy should not have been driving at all that day, the drugs did not have ‘any direct impact’ on her driving and her speed was the issue."

otolith

65,565 posts

228 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Double the speed limit, on her phone, failed to give way, hit someone and caused life changing injuries.

"Took some cocaine a couple of days previously" is pretty much irrelevant.

Compare;

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=44...

Swervin_Mervin

4,884 posts

262 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Pixelpeep Z4 said:
Vickers_VC10 said:
Swervin_Mervin said:
Because woman.
This.
is there a history of more leniency with female criminals ?

If so, we should have argued for keeping the pay gap.. surely this means we're equal ? biggrin
I was going to say "yeah, there's at least one story a month in the MEN alone"...

Today's headline story continues the theme, only this time this one has a history of drink and drug driving and driving whilst disqualified. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/great...

Pixelpeep Z4

Original Poster:

8,600 posts

166 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Swervin_Mervin said:
Pixelpeep Z4 said:
Vickers_VC10 said:
Swervin_Mervin said:
Because woman.
This.
is there a history of more leniency with female criminals ?

If so, we should have argued for keeping the pay gap.. surely this means we're equal ? biggrin
I was going to say "yeah, there's at least one story a month in the MEN alone"...

Today's headline story continues the theme, only this time this one has a history of drink and drug driving and driving whilst disqualified. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/great...
That is absurd . Still shocked me, even after everything i've read previously.

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

91 months

Thursday 15th July 2021
quotequote all
Zetec-S said:
I've always been of the opinion prison should be used for one of 2 things:

a) to protect the public
b) for punishment*

(* not revenge)

Obviously if something like this happened to someone close to me I'd be advocating all sorts of harsh punishments, but that's why the legal system if designed to be fair and impartial (even if it doesn't always look that way).

In this case, would sending her to prison be protecting the public? I doubt it, she is probably genuinely remorseful, with a driving ban and rehabilitation she will hopefully not repeat the same mistakes.

Sending her to prison as punishment - what does that achieve? She's obviously a "damaged" person, handing down a custodial sentence is probably going to compound that damage and make it harder for her to fit into society? If you do want to hand out a punishment then maybe a long term or even lifelong driving ban would be more appropriate?

(just my ramblings, appreciate this is PH and I'll be picked apart and flamed wink)
A signal to the great unwashed that such behaviour is not acceptable? Informing those close to her and so affected - who relinquish their innate moral right to seek revenge as a condition of our collective - that their voices are heard and that she is punished appropriately?

Of course there may be details that make a custodial sentence inappropriate I'm not jail-for-everyone but sentencing here does often seem difficult to reconcile.