Racist orchestra?
Author
Discussion

Biggus thingus

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

67 months

Murph7355

40,887 posts

279 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Biggus thingus said:
If they have 14 replacement musicians that are at least as good as the 14 they have let go, and that tick all the necessary diversity boxes that they feel they need to be ticking, then fair enough I guess.

If they don't, then they are being stupid and need to be called out on it and they should be being advised of the diversity of opportunity, not outcome.

The article notes they hired 12 new musicians, but doesn't note what diversity criteria they tick. And even with 12 it would leave them seemingly 2 down.

Maybe "diversity" was just used as a smokescreen to get rid of deadwood.

bitchstewie

64,412 posts

233 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Article said:
Musicians are hired by the ETO as freelancers, so can be dropped from the opera season-on-season, but many have played with the company for many years so consider it a permanent fixture.
Seems the key point.

Kes Arevo

3,555 posts

62 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Removing people because of skin colour, etc?

Don't care how you want to frame it, that is fked up.


thebraketester

15,543 posts

161 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Kes Arevo said:
Removing people because of skin colour, etc?

Don't care how you want to frame it, that is fked up.
Correct.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

267 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
thebraketester said:
Kes Arevo said:
Removing people because of skin colour, etc?

Don't care how you want to frame it, that is fked up.
Correct.
I concur.

Murph7355

40,887 posts

279 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
thebraketester said:
Kes Arevo said:
Removing people because of skin colour, etc?

Don't care how you want to frame it, that is fked up.
Correct.
I concur.
If that's what was done, it is.

It may not be what was done.

thebraketester

15,543 posts

161 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
Einion Yrth said:
thebraketester said:
Kes Arevo said:
Removing people because of skin colour, etc?

Don't care how you want to frame it, that is fked up.
Correct.
I concur.
If that's what was done, it is.

It may not be what was done.
It's what was done.

mwstewart

8,396 posts

211 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
More discrimination. It's rife at the moment. I hope that eventually the people making these kind of decisions come to the realisation that this is a nonsense approach and likely counter intuitive in the long run.

Kes Arevo

3,555 posts

62 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
thebraketester said:
It's what was done.
It reads precisely what was done. You are not rehired because skin colour, sexuality, gender. The new people were hired because of skin colour/sexuality/gender.

Scrump

23,758 posts

181 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Kes Arevo said:
It reads precisely what was done. You are not rehired because skin colour, sexuality, gender. The new people were hired because of skin colour/sexuality/gender.
Playing devil’s advocate, maybe the ones who have been there for years were hired because of skin colour/sexuality/gender.
Now there have been new auditions maybe the new people have been hired on the basis of musical skill, regardless of skin colour/sexuality/gender.

Ian Geary

5,376 posts

215 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Kes Arevo said:
thebraketester said:
It's what was done.
It reads precisely what was done. You are not rehired because skin colour, sexuality, gender. The new people were hired because of skin colour/sexuality/gender.
Yet this letter fro the eto is completely silent on colour, and sets out they chose people based on an open audition

https://englishtouringopera.org.uk/news/english-to...

Of course, the eto would have to be pretty frikin special to admit theyd decided based on race/ethnicity grounds!

Can't help feeling they'd have done better to adopt blind auditions. When I performed music as a youngster, competitions would have judges behind a curtain to avoid bias.

Still, accusations of racism coming from white people (who typically have far better outcomes in the UK) are going to ring pretty hollow in most people's ears....read the room guys, this just sounds like you want the status quo to remain unchallenged.


Kes Arevo

3,555 posts

62 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Scrump said:
Playing devil’s advocate, maybe the ones who have been there for years were hired because of skin colour/sexuality/gender.
Now there have been new auditions maybe the new people have been hired on the basis of musical skill, regardless of skin colour/sexuality/gender.
If that were the case, they would be hiring on ability, and not based on diversity.

AJL308

6,390 posts

179 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Ian Geary said:
Kes Arevo said:
thebraketester said:
It's what was done.
It reads precisely what was done. You are not rehired because skin colour, sexuality, gender. The new people were hired because of skin colour/sexuality/gender.
Yet this letter fro the eto is completely silent on colour, and sets out they chose people based on an open audition

https://englishtouringopera.org.uk/news/english-to...

Of course, the eto would have to be pretty frikin special to admit theyd decided based on race/ethnicity grounds!

Can't help feeling they'd have done better to adopt blind auditions. When I performed music as a youngster, competitions would have judges behind a curtain to avoid bias.

Still, accusations of racism coming from white people (who typically have far better outcomes in the UK) are going to ring pretty hollow in most people's ears....read the room guys, this just sounds like you want the status quo to remain unchallenged.
Whether they are on a temporary contract or not the legal question is simply one of; "has the person been treated less favorably because of a protected characteristic?". They clearly in that they have not had their contracts renewed due to their ehthnicity, gender, etc.

Kes Arevo

3,555 posts

62 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Ian Geary said:
Still, accusations of racism coming from white people (who typically have far better outcomes in the UK) are going to ring pretty hollow in most people's ears....read the room guys, this just sounds like you want the status quo to remain unchallenged.
Discrimination based on skin colour is bad, unless that skin colour is white, in which case meh?

Righto.

If they are discriminating based on arbitrary characteristics, fk em.

bitchstewie

64,412 posts

233 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
There's nothing I can see in the original article or letter that mentions race.

Simply increased diversity.

That might mean more younger or older musicians, more men or women, more LBGTQ+ musicians or any number of things.

Scrump

23,758 posts

181 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Kes Arevo said:
Scrump said:
Playing devil’s advocate, maybe the ones who have been there for years were hired because of skin colour/sexuality/gender.
Now there have been new auditions maybe the new people have been hired on the basis of musical skill, regardless of skin colour/sexuality/gender.
If that were the case, they would be hiring on ability, and not based on diversity.
They have not said they hired based on diversity. They say they based on ability:
“ The auditions were immensely rewarding and exciting; several musicians were offered opportunities to work with English Touring Opera for the first time, based on their ability.”
https://englishtouringopera.org.uk/news/english-to...
I read that as they held open auditions. This may have had the effect of a more diverse orchestra, particularly if previous contracts had not been made based purely on musical skills

Or maybe not. wobble

Kes Arevo

3,555 posts

62 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Scrump said:
They have not said they hired based on diversity. They say they based on ability:
“ The auditions were immensely rewarding and exciting; several musicians were offered opportunities to work with English Touring Opera for the first time, based on their ability.”
https://englishtouringopera.org.uk/news/english-to...
I read that as they held open auditions. This may have had the effect of a more diverse orchestra, particularly if previous contracts had not been made based purely on musical skills

Or maybe not. wobble
Hence why I said skin colour/sexuality/gender.


Scrump

23,758 posts

181 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Kes Arevo said:
Hence why I said skin colour/sexuality/gender.
scratchchin
Kes Arevo said:
If that were the case, they would be hiring on ability, and not based on diversity.

Kes Arevo

3,555 posts

62 months

Saturday 25th September 2021
quotequote all
Scrump said:
Kes Arevo said:
Hence why I said skin colour/sexuality/gender.
scratchchin
Kes Arevo said:
If that were the case, they would be hiring on ability, and not based on diversity.
Not sure what you are struggling with there.

The post that was responding to suggests the new hires were based in a ity, not diversity, and yet they cited diversity.