Argentina raising Falklands sovereignty again
Discussion
Argentinas President Alberto Fernández has raised the Falklands again at the United Nations, claiming they are illegally occupied by the UK. Usually this happens for political reasons and Fernández is under pressure for his handling of the coronavirus crisis and rising levels of poverty in Argentina.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/argentina-un...
Quite a good analysis here
https://globalriskinsights.com/2020/10/argentina-a...
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/argentina-un...
Quite a good analysis here
https://globalriskinsights.com/2020/10/argentina-a...
Biggy Stardust said:
The UN is big on self determination plus the Falklands have never been Argentine.
They can sod off.
I wonder how supportive the UN will really be towards the UK.They can sod off.
I agree that Argentina can be told to sod off. But I'm doubtful that global support would be all encompassing.
Murph7355 said:
I wonder how supportive the UN will really be towards the UK.
I agree that Argentina can be told to sod off. But I'm doubtful that global support would be all encompassing.
We don't need global support- we have typhoons & type 45 destroyers plus submarines. It wouldn't be the surprise it was last time.I agree that Argentina can be told to sod off. But I'm doubtful that global support would be all encompassing.
Biggy Stardust said:
Murph7355 said:
I wonder how supportive the UN will really be towards the UK.
I agree that Argentina can be told to sod off. But I'm doubtful that global support would be all encompassing.
We don't need global support- we have typhoons & type 45 destroyers plus submarines. It wouldn't be the surprise it was last time.I agree that Argentina can be told to sod off. But I'm doubtful that global support would be all encompassing.
A mate who lives in Argentina has assured me that whenever "the issue of the Maldivas" is raised there it's purely to distract the hard of thinking from negative domestic headlines.
Those who aren't hard of thinking are well aware what the politicians are up to, but it seems to repeatedly fob off enough of the population that it's still worth doing.
Those who aren't hard of thinking are well aware what the politicians are up to, but it seems to repeatedly fob off enough of the population that it's still worth doing.
Biggy Stardust said:
Murph7355 said:
I wonder how supportive the UN will really be towards the UK.
I agree that Argentina can be told to sod off. But I'm doubtful that global support would be all encompassing.
We don't need global support- we have typhoons & type 45 destroyers plus submarines. It wouldn't be the surprise it was last time.I agree that Argentina can be told to sod off. But I'm doubtful that global support would be all encompassing.
1. The Falklands have never been Argentinian.
2. The current inhabitants don't want to be Argentinian.
A country can't just claim another (or part of it) because it's close to them.
Biggy Stardust said:
Murph7355 said:
I wonder how supportive the UN will really be towards the UK.
I agree that Argentina can be told to sod off. But I'm doubtful that global support would be all encompassing.
We don't need global support- we have typhoons & type 45 destroyers plus submarines. It wouldn't be the surprise it was last time.I agree that Argentina can be told to sod off. But I'm doubtful that global support would be all encompassing.
It was more a response to the UN being big on self-determination...they are also politicians and they are big on things when it suits

The Argentinians must know that attempting anything militarily down there would be pretty stupid. Political posturing in the extreme.
(Argentina's a great country, and the people I met down there were absolutely fantastic. I also ended up in the Argentinian end for the game against Jamaica in the 1998 World Cup. That was interesting
).Argentina had a record $57bn bailout from the IMF and it seems more likely that the government will not be able to meet a $2.8bn repayment in March next year.
https://www.ft.com/content/ce0d1647-0bd7-4bb4-b787...
Argentina has been bailed out 21 times in 60 years.
https://www.ft.com/content/ce0d1647-0bd7-4bb4-b787...
Argentina has been bailed out 21 times in 60 years.
Murph7355 said:
The Argentinians must know that attempting anything militarily down there would be pretty stupid.
Especially these days as we don't have the resources to do a "traditional" large task force invasion so we would be forced to rely on upping the aggression to maximise effectiveness early on. eg using our submarines to their full ability, sinking ships to deny them use of the sea, and mainland strikes with TLAM to limit the reach of thier airforce from mainland bases. Plus heavy use of force by the air force elements on the islands in the early stages of an attempted invasion. That is assuming our weak politicians don't go chicken and let an invasion happen to avoid being seen as aggressive on the world stage.
Psycho Warren said:
Murph7355 said:
The Argentinians must know that attempting anything militarily down there would be pretty stupid.
Especially these days as we don't have the resources to do a "traditional" large task force invasion so we would be forced to rely on upping the aggression to maximise effectiveness early on. eg using our submarines to their full ability, sinking ships to deny them use of the sea, and mainland strikes with TLAM to limit the reach of thier airforce from mainland bases. Plus heavy use of force by the air force elements on the islands in the early stages of an attempted invasion. That is assuming our weak politicians don't go chicken and let an invasion happen to avoid being seen as aggressive on the world stage.
But I like Argentina, and it's just balls to deflect.
98elise said:
This. Plus...
1. The Falklands have never been Argentinian.
2. The current inhabitants don't want to be Argentinian.
A country can't just claim another (or part of it) because it's close to them.
It isn't even that close to them.1. The Falklands have never been Argentinian.
2. The current inhabitants don't want to be Argentinian.
A country can't just claim another (or part of it) because it's close to them.
It is like the UK claiming Iceland because it is "nearby" and a British fishing boat was based there in the early nineteenth century
JagLover said:
98elise said:
This. Plus...
1. The Falklands have never been Argentinian.
2. The current inhabitants don't want to be Argentinian.
A country can't just claim another (or part of it) because it's close to them.
It isn't even that close to them.1. The Falklands have never been Argentinian.
2. The current inhabitants don't want to be Argentinian.
A country can't just claim another (or part of it) because it's close to them.
It is like the UK claiming Iceland because it is "nearby" and a British fishing boat was based there in the early nineteenth century
Falkland Government has a good explanation.
https://www.falklands.gov.fk/self-governance/relat...
I'd imagine they'll start trying to impact the Falklands Ialands trade again, the fishing, especiallly squid.
Einion Yrth said:
FNG said:
A mate who lives in Argentina has assured me that whenever "the issue of the Maldivas" is raised there it's purely to distract the hard of thinking from negative domestic headlines.
.
Malvinas, mate; the Maldives are in the Indian ocean..
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



