WhatsApp cyber-flasher first to be jailed
Discussion
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-685436...
article said:
The first person in England and Wales to be convicted of cyber-flashing has been jailed for 66 weeks.
Looks like the nonce got caught red handeds1962a said:
Killboy said:
Incoming "boys will be boys" posts.
Hopefully no one on PH condones this kind of behaviour?boyse7en said:
s1962a said:
Killboy said:
Incoming "boys will be boys" posts.
Hopefully no one on PH condones this kind of behaviour?That is not a defence of anyone, before anyone tries to go down that road, but clearly not comparing apples with apples.
I don't think there will be anyone defending this scumbag, no matter how much some people are eagerly anticipating it.
boyse7en said:
Well , a thread a while back where someone's teenage son had been caught sending pics of himself to young teenage girls got plenty of "boys will be boys" type commentary, so I wouldn't bet against it.
Wasn't there a thread about someone in the forces exposing themselves to a barmaid? That had plenty of 'boys will be boys' comments iirc.Super Sonic said:
boyse7en said:
Well , a thread a while back where someone's teenage son had been caught sending pics of himself to young teenage girls got plenty of "boys will be boys" type commentary, so I wouldn't bet against it.
Wasn't there a thread about someone in the forces exposing themselves to a barmaid? That had plenty of 'boys will be boys' comments iirc.
Sounds like the right thing was done, the sentence, not the flashing bit.
Its weird it says "The woman took screenshots of the WhatsApp image sent on 9 February and reported it to police the same day." and that she is 15 ?
I remember "flashers" in comedy programs as a kid, bloke in a mac with nothing underneath jumps out of the bushes and opens his mac to passing ladies whilst making inappropriate noises, it was always a sort of comedic device and seen as funny but its not, does that old school flasher still exist or is it all via the internet now ?
Us chaps really need to understand, that by and large nobody wants to see our junk unless its as part of a relationship (occasionally) or a (relevant) GP visit
Its weird it says "The woman took screenshots of the WhatsApp image sent on 9 February and reported it to police the same day." and that she is 15 ?
I remember "flashers" in comedy programs as a kid, bloke in a mac with nothing underneath jumps out of the bushes and opens his mac to passing ladies whilst making inappropriate noises, it was always a sort of comedic device and seen as funny but its not, does that old school flasher still exist or is it all via the internet now ?
Us chaps really need to understand, that by and large nobody wants to see our junk unless its as part of a relationship (occasionally) or a (relevant) GP visit
J4CKO said:
Sounds like the right thing was done, the sentence, not the flashing bit.
Its weird it says "The woman took screenshots of the WhatsApp image sent on 9 February and reported it to police the same day." and that she is 15 ?
I remember "flashers" in comedy programs as a kid, bloke in a mac with nothing underneath jumps out of the bushes and opens his mac to passing ladies whilst making inappropriate noises, it was always a sort of comedic device and seen as funny but its not, does that old school flasher still exist or is it all via the internet now ?
Us chaps really need to understand, that by and large nobody wants to see our junk unless its as part of a relationship (occasionally) or a (relevant) GP visit
Actual old school flashing still happens but not that often but dick pics is pretty common, especially within online dating, women have been been known to ask to see what you're packing before meeting...... it's the unsolicited pics that are the problem and that's what the law is there for,for pervs like this blokeIts weird it says "The woman took screenshots of the WhatsApp image sent on 9 February and reported it to police the same day." and that she is 15 ?
I remember "flashers" in comedy programs as a kid, bloke in a mac with nothing underneath jumps out of the bushes and opens his mac to passing ladies whilst making inappropriate noises, it was always a sort of comedic device and seen as funny but its not, does that old school flasher still exist or is it all via the internet now ?
Us chaps really need to understand, that by and large nobody wants to see our junk unless its as part of a relationship (occasionally) or a (relevant) GP visit
Petrus1983 said:
66 weeks though seems a very long time when compared to physical sexual assaults on people of a similar age.
"Hawkes was already a registered sex offender after he was given a community order last year for exposure and sexual activity with a child under 16. That registration ran until November 2033."I expect a lot of girls and women will have experienced similar behaviour.
Some shocking reports out here.
Killboy said:
Super Sonic said:
Wasn't there a thread about someone in the forces exposing themselves to a barmaid? That had plenty of 'boys will be boys' comments iirc.
And the Metaverse thing - where the answer was to lock your children up and not allow them to do anything online.Bluevanman said:
J4CKO said:
Sounds like the right thing was done, the sentence, not the flashing bit.
Its weird it says "The woman took screenshots of the WhatsApp image sent on 9 February and reported it to police the same day." and that she is 15 ?
I remember "flashers" in comedy programs as a kid, bloke in a mac with nothing underneath jumps out of the bushes and opens his mac to passing ladies whilst making inappropriate noises, it was always a sort of comedic device and seen as funny but its not, does that old school flasher still exist or is it all via the internet now ?
Us chaps really need to understand, that by and large nobody wants to see our junk unless its as part of a relationship (occasionally) or a (relevant) GP visit
Actual old school flashing still happens but not that often but dick pics is pretty common, especially within online dating, women have been been known to ask to see what you're packing before meeting...... it's the unsolicited pics that are the problem and that's what the law is there for,for pervs like this blokeIts weird it says "The woman took screenshots of the WhatsApp image sent on 9 February and reported it to police the same day." and that she is 15 ?
I remember "flashers" in comedy programs as a kid, bloke in a mac with nothing underneath jumps out of the bushes and opens his mac to passing ladies whilst making inappropriate noises, it was always a sort of comedic device and seen as funny but its not, does that old school flasher still exist or is it all via the internet now ?
Us chaps really need to understand, that by and large nobody wants to see our junk unless its as part of a relationship (occasionally) or a (relevant) GP visit
I said “there, got it, here have a look”, but the end was not in the boot anymore
She just said something about there being a tiny slug in there as well as all that dampness….
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff