Well done that man "Entertainer founder hands over toy shop"
Well done that man "Entertainer founder hands over toy shop"
Author
Discussion

cirian75

Original Poster:

4,568 posts

249 months

"Entertainer founder hands over toy shop chain to staff"

"The founder of the UK's biggest toy chain, the Entertainer, is handing over control of the business to his 1,900 workers.

Gary Grant opened his first shop with his wife Catherine in 1981 when he was 23. He's now 66, and his multi-million pound empire spans 160 shops across the UK.

He is transferring 100% ownership of the family-owned business to an employee trust which means staff will get a share of the profits and a say in how the firm is run."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgm2jjwmw9jo

bazza white

3,674 posts

144 months

I know the reason but still amazes me they refuse to open Sundays when all you hear is trouble in the high street.

Sounds like an all round decent bloke though. Well done him .

ChevronB19

8,046 posts

179 months

bazza white said:
I know the reason but still amazes me they refuse to open Sundays when all you hear is trouble in the high street.

Sounds like an all round decent bloke though. Well done him .
Might change now it has moved to the employee ownership model (and well done him and his wife), but hey, it was their company, they could do what they like.

z4RRSchris

12,009 posts

195 months

hes getting paid for handing it over, in future profits. so not as white knight as you think.

its just a way for him to set his own buy out price with a buyer who cant negoiate.


JoshSm

1,563 posts

53 months

z4RRSchris said:
hes getting paid for handing it over, in future profits. so not as white knight as you think.

its just a way for him to set his own buy out price with a buyer who cant negoiate.
Yes, he's not exactly gifting it.

Panamax

6,566 posts

50 months

JoshSm said:
Yes, he's not exactly gifting it.
Yes, he's definitely gifting it. He's simply continuing to have a share of future profits that were already his.

If you've got £100 and give somebody £90 you'd be a bit miffed if they turned around and said, "That £90 isn't a gift because you've kept £10 for yourself".

JoshSm

1,563 posts

53 months

Panamax said:
Yes, he's definitely gifting it. He's simply continuing to have a share of future profits that were already his.
"They will receive a payout for the transfer of their 100% shareholding, which will be taken out of the profits over time."

That reads as a buyout over an extended period, not a gift.

If someone is giving me a payout in exchange for the transfer of an asset it isn't a gift is it?

Murph7355

40,379 posts

272 months

JoshSm said:
Panamax said:
Yes, he's definitely gifting it. He's simply continuing to have a share of future profits that were already his.
"They will receive a payout for the transfer of their 100% shareholding, which will be taken out of the profits over time."

That reads as a buyout over an extended period, not a gift.

If someone is giving me a payout in exchange for the transfer of an asset it isn't a gift is it?
He could, of course, just say" fk it, I'm selling on the open market and fk the staff". Presumably that would be preferable in your book. Rather than the staff getting the asset without really having to shell out anything?

You are Jeremy Corbyn AICMFP.

Panamax

6,566 posts

50 months

JoshSm said:
If someone is giving me a payout in exchange for the transfer of an asset it isn't a gift is it?
Gifting "most" of something is still a gift.

In this case the donor is giving way everything except some of the future profits.

z4RRSchris

12,009 posts

195 months

its not a gift, its at best a staff led MBO with a success payout over time.

good marketing though.

JoshSm

1,563 posts

53 months

Murph7355 said:
He could, of course, just say" fk it, I'm selling on the open market and fk the staff". Presumably that would be preferable in your book. Rather than the staff getting the asset without really having to shell out anything?

You are Jeremy Corbyn AICMFP.
Are you mental?

He can dump the thing anyway he wants. Some people seem to think he's given it away. He hasn't. The business is buying him out led by the existing management.

Wrapping it up the way it is helps to maintain it as currently run in a way a third party sale wouldn't have.

In reality most of the staff are seeing very little, a bit like those at John Lewis don't. Nothing they can apparently sell for one.

It's good PR but it's definitely not an act of huge generosity.

crofty1984

16,470 posts

220 months

Oh look, people arguing on the internet.

MCBrowncoat

1,338 posts

162 months

Somewhat disappointed Gary Grant isn't besuited, perma tanned and speaks in a funny mid Atlantic accent (although I haven't heard him, so I suppose he might...)

Ridgemont

7,636 posts

147 months

Very odd man.
Banned Harry Potter merchandise from his shops but had a 7ft model of Darth Vader in his HQ reception.

Patio

1,188 posts

27 months

Fair play to him!

Just waiting for the DM article to find out what he drives and how much his house is worth

z4RRSchris

12,009 posts

195 months

Patio said:
Fair play to him!

Just waiting for the DM article to find out what he drives and how much his house is worth
latimer park farm, c350 acres, bought under a charity he runs then leased to him. sounds like a nice tax efficient way.

great business, makes c£6m and has £37m cash on the books (i suspect he will take that out or gift it)

Patio

1,188 posts

27 months

z4RRSchris said:
Patio said:
Fair play to him!

Just waiting for the DM article to find out what he drives and how much his house is worth
latimer park farm, c350 acres, bought under a charity he runs then leased to him. sounds like a nice tax efficient way.

great business, makes c£6m and has £37m cash on the books (i suspect he will take that out or gift it)
Cracking aspirational story

Started business from scratch and clearly thinks alot about his staff to prioritise them over opening every available minute to claw in every last £

He would be great asset to any govt to advise them on business policy

JQ

6,368 posts

195 months

It's not a gift. A gift would be him not receiving any payment now or in the future. He's getting paid. And by selling to the employees there's a greater likelihood of the company continuing to be a success, thereby increasing the future payouts.

And whilst my understanding of corporate tax law is not comprehensive, I'm pretty sure it avoids Capital Gains Tax.

It's a great think he's done as it means it won't be stripped dry by a PE buyer, but be under no illusion, it is a financially beneficial way of him exiting the business.

Rufus Stone

10,425 posts

72 months

100% CGT relief on selling shares to a Employee Ownership Trust.

gotoPzero

19,129 posts

205 months

The guy has a great accountant that's all I will say!!