David Walliams dropped by publisher over behaviour to women
David Walliams dropped by publisher over behaviour to women
Author
Discussion

butchstewie

Original Poster:

62,395 posts

230 months

Yesterday (16:14)
quotequote all
He's one of those people who's always had "something of the night" about him in my view as someone once said about someone else.

David Walliams dropped by publisher over inappropriate behaviour towards women

Vsix and Vtec

1,208 posts

38 months

Yesterday (16:24)
quotequote all
Really? I thought he was into blokes.

Hippea

2,811 posts

89 months

Yesterday (16:27)
quotequote all
I don’t like being the person that says things like this but I’m going to say it……there’s always been something somewhat sinister about him. Just not a good vibe

Vsix and Vtec

1,208 posts

38 months

Yesterday (16:31)
quotequote all
Hippea said:
I don t like being the person that says things like this but I m going to say it there s always been something somewhat sinister about him. Just not a good vibe
I always put him in the same box as Noel Fielding and Graham Norton, a person of campness who was just a bit of an odd duck that the BBC liked. Yes they come across a bit strange, but then thats TV people in general and the BBC likes to employ that demographic.

andy43

12,262 posts

274 months

Yesterday (19:09)
quotequote all

bloomen

8,922 posts

179 months

Yesterday (19:11)
quotequote all
Vsix and Vtec said:
I always put him in the same box as Noel Fielding and Graham Norton, a person of campness who was just a bit of an odd duck that the BBC liked. Yes they come across a bit strange, but then thats TV people in general and the BBC likes to employ that demographic.
I automatically assume that anyone in the spotlight is a paedophile, rapist, cannibal and nazi and it's on them to prove to me otherwise.

Ascayman

13,210 posts

236 months

Yesterday (19:19)
quotequote all
bloomen said:
Vsix and Vtec said:
I always put him in the same box as Noel Fielding and Graham Norton, a person of campness who was just a bit of an odd duck that the BBC liked. Yes they come across a bit strange, but then thats TV people in general and the BBC likes to employ that demographic.
I automatically assume that anyone in the spotlight is a paedophile, rapist, cannibal and nazi and it's on them to prove to me otherwise.
To be fair, when it comes to the BBC that’s not a bad starting point.

Ridgemont

8,155 posts

151 months

Yesterday (19:20)
quotequote all
Walliams a wrong un?
Who da thunk.

His Wikipedia entry (section public image) is lovely.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Walliams

Not a nice guy.

Voldemort

7,122 posts

298 months

Yesterday (19:24)
quotequote all

ninepoint2

3,805 posts

180 months

Yesterday (19:47)
quotequote all
I have always had the view that he would be the next Jimmy Saville TBH

Edited by ninepoint2 on Friday 19th December 20:47

Terminator X

18,929 posts

224 months

Yesterday (19:53)
quotequote all
ninepoint2 said:
I have always had the view that he wouold be the next Jimmy Saville TBH
Wtf from zero to hot within a few posts!

TX.

GasEngineer

1,892 posts

82 months

Vsix and Vtec said:
Really? I thought he was into blokes.
Same here. It doesn't say what form the harassment took but does seem odd for a gay man.

butchstewie

Original Poster:

62,395 posts

230 months

I don't care about his sexual preferences this is about alleged behaviour but he's been married to a woman had a string of "punching above his weight" girlfriends etc. so I think he might be one of those people where a lot of assumptions were made based on appearance and mannerisms.

scenario8

7,481 posts

199 months

For a gay man he certainly has had a succession of very attractive former girlfriends. And of course a (model) wife.

An alumni of Reigate Grammar (as was Kier Starmer, fwiw). Raised in Banstead. Attended Bristol. It’s like I’ve been unknowingly following him around.

I imagine many will only know of him as a kind of modern day Kenneth Williams, unaware of the breadth of his work in children’s literature and films/tv.

Obviously he has, or had, a bit of a reputation. Who knows what’s behind this latest furore. I imagine the press have a free pass now.

Derek Smith

48,374 posts

268 months

scenario8 said:
For a gay man he certainly has had a succession of very attractive former girlfriends. And of course a (model) wife.

An alumni of Reigate Grammar (as was Kier Starmer, fwiw). Raised in Banstead. Attended Bristol. It s like I ve been unknowingly following him around.

I imagine many will only know of him as a kind of modern day Kenneth Williams, unaware of the breadth of his work in children s literature and films/tv.

Obviously he has, or had, a bit of a reputation. Who knows what s behind this latest furore. I imagine the press have a free pass now.
He doesn't regard himself as gay evidently; more sort of bisexual. He's made a mint from his book sales and that's something that adds to his attraction to many. I don't find him particularly funny.

It would appear - admitted by Murdoch's Harper Collins according to reports - he was not informed of the investigation into his behaviour, nor given the opportunity to reply. From my understanding, that gives him leverage in accessing compensation. I would assume he'll sue, or threaten to, and there could well be a massive payout. He's was a nice earner for Murdoch, and Walliams might well feel he has money coming in if due process hasn't been followed. There can be demands against him by those who feel they have been improperly dealt with.

I always thought he was playing up to being creepy. It appears I may have been wrong.

Wheelspinning

2,125 posts

50 months

Derek Smith said:
He doesn't regard himself as gay evidently; more sort of bisexual. He's made a mint from his book sales and that's something that adds to his attraction to many. I don't find him particularly funny.

It would appear - admitted by Murdoch's Harper Collins according to reports - he was not informed of the investigation into his behaviour, nor given the opportunity to reply. From my understanding, that gives him leverage in accessing compensation. I would assume he'll sue, or threaten to, and there could well be a massive payout. He's was a nice earner for Murdoch, and Walliams might well feel he has money coming in if due process hasn't been followed. There can be demands against him by those who feel they have been improperly dealt with.

I always thought he was playing up to being creepy. It appears I may have been wrong.
It's reported that during the year long investigation, at least one employee left Harper Collins with a five figure settlement, and all other female staff were told when in his presence, ensure they are in pairs.

He made them a serious ton of cash, so to cut ties with him after an investigation is seriously detrimental to their earnings, so not a descion taken lightly; that speaks volumes.

borcy

9,259 posts

76 months

I'm sure they'll be reports of it happening over many years, reported to seniors managers who carried out an internal investigation but chose to give him a verbal warning etc.

Jasandjules

71,652 posts

249 months

No actual information then? But disturbing if staff were told to go in pairs.

Don Roque

18,194 posts

179 months

He's always come across as absolutely vile. One of the godawful, talentless idiots that the media establishment like to inflict on the public because they're a luvvie. These recent revelations about his behaviour are disgusting.

PRO5T

6,596 posts

45 months

Must be about the least surprising news to come out of the gossip columns in 2025. Still time yet I suppose though.