What would it actually cost the Government, and us....
What would it actually cost the Government, and us....
Author
Discussion

Hughesie

Original Poster:

12,687 posts

303 months

Yesterday (19:12)
quotequote all
to actually run the country in a way you'd not be embarrassed by.

And by that i mean:

Fix the pot holes
Run a proper social care sector
Provide proper services (bin collections etc)
Get/make the dole dossers earn their keep
Better well run transportation

a complete over haul of the system, start afresh, what would it cost the average man on the street, could it be afforded ?

If the average earner (£30k) paid an extra £100 a month but you get world class services and roads, would you pay it ?



Terminator X

19,208 posts

225 months

Yesterday (19:17)
quotequote all
Govt already too big and seem to want to get bigger. Slim it down and collect less tax FFS.

TX.

kiethton

14,460 posts

201 months

Yesterday (19:18)
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
Govt already too big and seem to want to get bigger. Slim it down and collect less tax FFS.
This in spades

grumbledoak

32,322 posts

254 months

Yesterday (19:21)
quotequote all
The upper limit to waste is 100%.

and still they wouldn't fix the pot holes.

Slow.Patrol

3,734 posts

35 months

Yesterday (19:27)
quotequote all
Public Sector Debt (Government Debt)
Per Person: Around £40,500 per person, based on Public Sector Net Debt of £2.805 trillion (93% of GDP) at the end of 2024/25.

We are fked. £100 per tax payer would be a drop in the ocean.

Super Sonic

11,672 posts

75 months

Yesterday (19:28)
quotequote all
What about Education?
The NHS?
Defence?
Police?Prisons?

sam.rog

1,318 posts

99 months

Yesterday (19:37)
quotequote all
I’ve wondered what would happen if you set a flat rate at 25% tax. Then increase vat on non essentials.
The more you buy the more you pay.
Perhaps even have a super vat on “luxury” goods.

Scrap council tax and do it by house value calculated every 2 years.
No property tax if downsizing.

ChocolateFrog

34,497 posts

194 months

Yesterday (19:46)
quotequote all
I think quite a lot of people would happily jump into a ready made system where they pay more but the benefits are immediately obvious.

Most people don't seem to be able to accept that they pay more now and in a couple of years they'll be able to see the benefits.

Graduates are expected to live while paying 9% more than everyone else. So the notion that everyone is being squeezed until their pips squeak is clearly bks.

hidetheelephants

32,956 posts

214 months

Yesterday (20:18)
quotequote all
sam.rog said:
I ve wondered what would happen if you set a flat rate at 25% tax. Then increase vat on non essentials.
The more you buy the more you pay.
Perhaps even have a super vat on luxury goods.

Scrap council tax and do it by house value calculated every 2 years.
No property tax if downsizing.
The problem with taxing the developed value of property is that it's rather subjective, taxing the value of the land it sits on is less so.

John145

2,674 posts

177 months

Yesterday (21:08)
quotequote all
I'd go for a complete shake up of tax.

Money coming in to you, regardless of source, is taxed. This can be offset against work whether professional or voluntary.

Make all costs involved with doing your work tax deductible.

So the extremes you earn £80k per year doing 50 hours a week. 80,000/2400 (assuming 4 weeks off holiday) = £33.3/hr.

£0-10/hr = free
0-20 = 10%
20-30 = 20%
30-40 = 30%
40+ = 40%
Basically whatever rates and bands need doing that gets the tax take in.

Also, allow household combinations, delete childbenefit. If you have 5 kids and you earn £200k a year you get 6x the tax allowances so basically pay zero tax.

Finally the other extreme, say you work 2 days a week at £150k you'd be paying a lot of tax. ~£97/hr and most of it will be charged at 40%, but if you work an extra 3 days a week the charge rate will not decrease.

Encourage people to work. And work lots of hours. If you're on a fixed salary if you do unpaid OT you can claim this against your hourly rate for a tax break. Encourage people to work longer hours.

Randy Winkman

20,255 posts

210 months

Yesterday (21:25)
quotequote all
John145 said:
I'd go for a complete shake up of tax.

Money coming in to you, regardless of source, is taxed. This can be offset against work whether professional or voluntary.

Make all costs involved with doing your work tax deductible.

So the extremes you earn £80k per year doing 50 hours a week. 80,000/2400 (assuming 4 weeks off holiday) = £33.3/hr.

£0-10/hr = free
0-20 = 10%
20-30 = 20%
30-40 = 30%
40+ = 40%
Basically whatever rates and bands need doing that gets the tax take in.

Also, allow household combinations, delete childbenefit. If you have 5 kids and you earn £200k a year you get 6x the tax allowances so basically pay zero tax.

Finally the other extreme, say you work 2 days a week at £150k you'd be paying a lot of tax. ~£97/hr and most of it will be charged at 40%, but if you work an extra 3 days a week the charge rate will not decrease.

Encourage people to work. And work lots of hours. If you're on a fixed salary if you do unpaid OT you can claim this against your hourly rate for a tax break. Encourage people to work longer hours.
What if you need to work part time because of caring responsibilities?

John145

2,674 posts

177 months

Yesterday (21:30)
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
John145 said:
I'd go for a complete shake up of tax.

Money coming in to you, regardless of source, is taxed. This can be offset against work whether professional or voluntary.

Make all costs involved with doing your work tax deductible.

So the extremes you earn £80k per year doing 50 hours a week. 80,000/2400 (assuming 4 weeks off holiday) = £33.3/hr.

£0-10/hr = free
0-20 = 10%
20-30 = 20%
30-40 = 30%
40+ = 40%
Basically whatever rates and bands need doing that gets the tax take in.

Also, allow household combinations, delete childbenefit. If you have 5 kids and you earn £200k a year you get 6x the tax allowances so basically pay zero tax.

Finally the other extreme, say you work 2 days a week at £150k you'd be paying a lot of tax. ~£97/hr and most of it will be charged at 40%, but if you work an extra 3 days a week the charge rate will not decrease.

Encourage people to work. And work lots of hours. If you're on a fixed salary if you do unpaid OT you can claim this against your hourly rate for a tax break. Encourage people to work longer hours.
What if you need to work part time because of caring responsibilities?
Voluntary work (caring) would be claimable. Depending on the dependent's requirements - part time care 20 hours per week, full time care 70 hours per week. Also if you were savvy you'd register both at the same address to combine tax allowances.

Bathroom_Security

3,748 posts

138 months

Yesterday (21:50)
quotequote all
Jesus wept im glad some of these forum users aren't running the country.

John145

2,674 posts

177 months

Yesterday (22:06)
quotequote all
Bathroom_Security said:
Jesus wept im glad some of these forum users aren't running the country.
Can't be worse than the past 15 years...

stevesingo

5,009 posts

243 months

Yesterday (22:10)
quotequote all
Slow.Patrol said:
Public Sector Debt (Government Debt)
Per Person: Around £40,500 per person, based on Public Sector Net Debt of £2.805 trillion (93% of GDP) at the end of 2024/25.

We are fked. £100 per tax payer would be a drop in the ocean.
US debt is the equivalent of near $100,000 or £74,000 per person.

Doesn't seem so bad in comparison.

Still bad though.

BoRED S2upid

20,903 posts

261 months

Yesterday (22:12)
quotequote all
Slow.Patrol said:
Public Sector Debt (Government Debt)
Per Person: Around £40,500 per person, based on Public Sector Net Debt of £2.805 trillion (93% of GDP) at the end of 2024/25.

We are fked. £100 per tax payer would be a drop in the ocean.
Chicken feed compared to America nearly 300,000 each!

Murph7355

40,808 posts

277 months

Yesterday (23:30)
quotequote all
Hughesie said:
...
Fix the pot holes
Run a proper social care sector
Provide proper services (bin collections etc)
Get/make the dole dossers earn their keep
Better well run transportation
....
  • billions in all likelihood. But maybe we can stop using shoddy techniques where roads are chewed up within a year and get some decent warranty on works?
  • 10s of billions in all likelihood. Not sure what can done on this
  • My bins are fine. £0 extra
  • £0 or even cost benefit
  • Transportation here's perfectly fine

bloomen

9,093 posts

180 months

Before increasing anything I'd set my minions on plotting Laffer curves on everything and getting rid of anything that sticks out.

Can't believe the 100k cliff edge is still allowed to exist.

There must be a ton of businesses that are either refusing to expand or simply giving up because it's not worth progressing because of the burden stuck on them.

Government should at least once try ever so slightly to get out of the way to see what happens rather than parking itself on your face and guffing.

An economy that feels like it can get ahead is going to be more productive.


hidetheelephants

32,956 posts

214 months

bloomen said:
Can't believe the 100k cliff edge is still allowed to exist.
Why do any of the the cliff edges exist? The knowledge about how cliff edges drive behaviour is well known, I can't think of any reason software couldn't allow gradual changes in tax rate for most people on a wage, or indeed everyone if it were calculated in arrears?

bloomen

9,093 posts

180 months

Indeed. It must be rampant absolutely everywhere and produces humongous, and counterproductive, distortions.

Beyond a flat tax here and there, I can't think of any other country that's done anything about it.