What would it actually cost the Government, and us....
What would it actually cost the Government, and us....
Author
Discussion

Hughesie

Original Poster:

12,713 posts

305 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
to actually run the country in a way you'd not be embarrassed by.

And by that i mean:

Fix the pot holes
Run a proper social care sector
Provide proper services (bin collections etc)
Get/make the dole dossers earn their keep
Better well run transportation

a complete over haul of the system, start afresh, what would it cost the average man on the street, could it be afforded ?

If the average earner (£30k) paid an extra £100 a month but you get world class services and roads, would you pay it ?



Terminator X

19,505 posts

227 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
Govt already too big and seem to want to get bigger. Slim it down and collect less tax FFS.

TX.

kiethton

14,499 posts

203 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
Govt already too big and seem to want to get bigger. Slim it down and collect less tax FFS.
This in spades

grumbledoak

32,363 posts

256 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
The upper limit to waste is 100%.

and still they wouldn't fix the pot holes.

Slow.Patrol

4,312 posts

37 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
Public Sector Debt (Government Debt)
Per Person: Around £40,500 per person, based on Public Sector Net Debt of £2.805 trillion (93% of GDP) at the end of 2024/25.

We are fked. £100 per tax payer would be a drop in the ocean.

Super Sonic

12,169 posts

77 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
What about Education?
The NHS?
Defence?
Police?Prisons?

sam.rog

1,363 posts

101 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
I’ve wondered what would happen if you set a flat rate at 25% tax. Then increase vat on non essentials.
The more you buy the more you pay.
Perhaps even have a super vat on “luxury” goods.

Scrap council tax and do it by house value calculated every 2 years.
No property tax if downsizing.

ChocolateFrog

34,954 posts

196 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
I think quite a lot of people would happily jump into a ready made system where they pay more but the benefits are immediately obvious.

Most people don't seem to be able to accept that they pay more now and in a couple of years they'll be able to see the benefits.

Graduates are expected to live while paying 9% more than everyone else. So the notion that everyone is being squeezed until their pips squeak is clearly bks.

hidetheelephants

33,644 posts

216 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
sam.rog said:
I ve wondered what would happen if you set a flat rate at 25% tax. Then increase vat on non essentials.
The more you buy the more you pay.
Perhaps even have a super vat on luxury goods.

Scrap council tax and do it by house value calculated every 2 years.
No property tax if downsizing.
The problem with taxing the developed value of property is that it's rather subjective, taxing the value of the land it sits on is less so.

John145

2,729 posts

179 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
I'd go for a complete shake up of tax.

Money coming in to you, regardless of source, is taxed. This can be offset against work whether professional or voluntary.

Make all costs involved with doing your work tax deductible.

So the extremes you earn £80k per year doing 50 hours a week. 80,000/2400 (assuming 4 weeks off holiday) = £33.3/hr.

£0-10/hr = free
0-20 = 10%
20-30 = 20%
30-40 = 30%
40+ = 40%
Basically whatever rates and bands need doing that gets the tax take in.

Also, allow household combinations, delete childbenefit. If you have 5 kids and you earn £200k a year you get 6x the tax allowances so basically pay zero tax.

Finally the other extreme, say you work 2 days a week at £150k you'd be paying a lot of tax. ~£97/hr and most of it will be charged at 40%, but if you work an extra 3 days a week the charge rate will not decrease.

Encourage people to work. And work lots of hours. If you're on a fixed salary if you do unpaid OT you can claim this against your hourly rate for a tax break. Encourage people to work longer hours.

Randy Winkman

20,793 posts

212 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
John145 said:
I'd go for a complete shake up of tax.

Money coming in to you, regardless of source, is taxed. This can be offset against work whether professional or voluntary.

Make all costs involved with doing your work tax deductible.

So the extremes you earn £80k per year doing 50 hours a week. 80,000/2400 (assuming 4 weeks off holiday) = £33.3/hr.

£0-10/hr = free
0-20 = 10%
20-30 = 20%
30-40 = 30%
40+ = 40%
Basically whatever rates and bands need doing that gets the tax take in.

Also, allow household combinations, delete childbenefit. If you have 5 kids and you earn £200k a year you get 6x the tax allowances so basically pay zero tax.

Finally the other extreme, say you work 2 days a week at £150k you'd be paying a lot of tax. ~£97/hr and most of it will be charged at 40%, but if you work an extra 3 days a week the charge rate will not decrease.

Encourage people to work. And work lots of hours. If you're on a fixed salary if you do unpaid OT you can claim this against your hourly rate for a tax break. Encourage people to work longer hours.
What if you need to work part time because of caring responsibilities?

John145

2,729 posts

179 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
John145 said:
I'd go for a complete shake up of tax.

Money coming in to you, regardless of source, is taxed. This can be offset against work whether professional or voluntary.

Make all costs involved with doing your work tax deductible.

So the extremes you earn £80k per year doing 50 hours a week. 80,000/2400 (assuming 4 weeks off holiday) = £33.3/hr.

£0-10/hr = free
0-20 = 10%
20-30 = 20%
30-40 = 30%
40+ = 40%
Basically whatever rates and bands need doing that gets the tax take in.

Also, allow household combinations, delete childbenefit. If you have 5 kids and you earn £200k a year you get 6x the tax allowances so basically pay zero tax.

Finally the other extreme, say you work 2 days a week at £150k you'd be paying a lot of tax. ~£97/hr and most of it will be charged at 40%, but if you work an extra 3 days a week the charge rate will not decrease.

Encourage people to work. And work lots of hours. If you're on a fixed salary if you do unpaid OT you can claim this against your hourly rate for a tax break. Encourage people to work longer hours.
What if you need to work part time because of caring responsibilities?
Voluntary work (caring) would be claimable. Depending on the dependent's requirements - part time care 20 hours per week, full time care 70 hours per week. Also if you were savvy you'd register both at the same address to combine tax allowances.

Bathroom_Security

3,773 posts

140 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
Jesus wept im glad some of these forum users aren't running the country.

John145

2,729 posts

179 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
Bathroom_Security said:
Jesus wept im glad some of these forum users aren't running the country.
Can't be worse than the past 15 years...

stevesingo

5,022 posts

245 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
Slow.Patrol said:
Public Sector Debt (Government Debt)
Per Person: Around £40,500 per person, based on Public Sector Net Debt of £2.805 trillion (93% of GDP) at the end of 2024/25.

We are fked. £100 per tax payer would be a drop in the ocean.
US debt is the equivalent of near $100,000 or £74,000 per person.

Doesn't seem so bad in comparison.

Still bad though.

BoRED S2upid

20,976 posts

263 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
Slow.Patrol said:
Public Sector Debt (Government Debt)
Per Person: Around £40,500 per person, based on Public Sector Net Debt of £2.805 trillion (93% of GDP) at the end of 2024/25.

We are fked. £100 per tax payer would be a drop in the ocean.
Chicken feed compared to America nearly 300,000 each!

Murph7355

40,862 posts

279 months

Tuesday 20th January
quotequote all
Hughesie said:
...
Fix the pot holes
Run a proper social care sector
Provide proper services (bin collections etc)
Get/make the dole dossers earn their keep
Better well run transportation
....
  • billions in all likelihood. But maybe we can stop using shoddy techniques where roads are chewed up within a year and get some decent warranty on works?
  • 10s of billions in all likelihood. Not sure what can done on this
  • My bins are fine. £0 extra
  • £0 or even cost benefit
  • Transportation here's perfectly fine

bloomen

9,365 posts

182 months

Wednesday 21st January
quotequote all
Before increasing anything I'd set my minions on plotting Laffer curves on everything and getting rid of anything that sticks out.

Can't believe the 100k cliff edge is still allowed to exist.

There must be a ton of businesses that are either refusing to expand or simply giving up because it's not worth progressing because of the burden stuck on them.

Government should at least once try ever so slightly to get out of the way to see what happens rather than parking itself on your face and guffing.

An economy that feels like it can get ahead is going to be more productive.


hidetheelephants

33,644 posts

216 months

Wednesday 21st January
quotequote all
bloomen said:
Can't believe the 100k cliff edge is still allowed to exist.
Why do any of the the cliff edges exist? The knowledge about how cliff edges drive behaviour is well known, I can't think of any reason software couldn't allow gradual changes in tax rate for most people on a wage, or indeed everyone if it were calculated in arrears?

bloomen

9,365 posts

182 months

Wednesday 21st January
quotequote all
Indeed. It must be rampant absolutely everywhere and produces humongous, and counterproductive, distortions.

Beyond a flat tax here and there, I can't think of any other country that's done anything about it.