Overly Lenient Sentence for Death by Careless Driving
Overly Lenient Sentence for Death by Careless Driving
Author
Discussion

Ken986

Original Poster:

587 posts

150 months

Friday 6th February
quotequote all
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg4e45107pwo

Unbelievable sentence handed down after a 12 year old killed by a negligent driver.

aceofspades1

361 posts

47 months

Friday 6th February
quotequote all
Sickening.

55palfers

6,309 posts

190 months

Friday 6th February
quotequote all
3 years for a dodgy tweet though.

Countdown

48,306 posts

222 months

Friday 6th February
quotequote all
Vermin.

agtlaw

7,345 posts

232 months

Saturday 7th February
quotequote all
The BBC article omitted some important details. The defendant was initially charged with CDDD and later pleaded guilty to CDCD and dangerous driving.

From the few facts reported, I’m surprised that the prosecuting authority accepted a plea to CDCD (and DD) rather than CDDD.

In E&W the maximum sentence for CDCD is 5 years.

As to whether the sentence in this case is lenient, I have no information about NI cases.

If E&W then:

“In 2021, around 210 offenders were sentenced for causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving. Most offenders were either given a suspended sentence order (41 per cent) or a community order (31 per cent). A further 25 per cent were sentenced to immediate custody, 2 per cent received a fine and 1 per cent were recorded as ‘otherwise dealt with’. … In 2021, the Average Custodial Sentence Length for this offence was 1 year 2 months.” – Sentencing Council

In E&W a custodial sentence of two years or less can be suspended for up to two years. I assume NI has a similar provision.

Sheepshanks

39,973 posts

145 months

Saturday 7th February
quotequote all
Is sentencing based on what was typical around the time?

Or perhaps softened in view of time passed since the incident?

Edited by Sheepshanks on Saturday 7th February 07:48

nordboy

3,173 posts

76 months

Saturday 7th February
quotequote all
agtlaw said:
The BBC article omitted some important details. The defendant was initially charged with CDDD and later pleaded guilty to CDCD and dangerous driving.

From the few facts reported, I m surprised that the prosecuting authority accepted a plea to CDCD (and DD) rather than CDDD.

In E&W the maximum sentence for CDCD is 5 years.

As to whether the sentence in this case is lenient, I have no information about NI cases.

If E&W then:

In 2021, around 210 offenders were sentenced for causing death by careless or inconsiderate driving. Most offenders were either given a suspended sentence order (41 per cent) or a community order (31 per cent). A further 25 per cent were sentenced to immediate custody, 2 per cent received a fine and 1 per cent were recorded as otherwise dealt with . In 2021, the Average Custodial Sentence Length for this offence was 1 year 2 months. Sentencing Council

In E&W a custodial sentence of two years or less can be suspended for up to two years. I assume NI has a similar provision.
That's nuts? How you can plead guilty to CDCD and dangerous driving but not CDDD isn't right. It's either one or the other, the victim died due to the collision and the standard of driving, that's fact.

I had a similar case years ago for a serious injury case where he plead guilty to dangerous driving but not CSIDD, the judge went ballistic on his legal team and he was immediately found guilty of CSIDD. The obvious reason being that the injuries were caused by the DD.

agtlaw

7,345 posts

232 months

Saturday 7th February
quotequote all
Sheepshanks said:
Is sentencing based on what was typical around the time?

Or perhaps softened in view of time passed since the incident?

Edited by Sheepshanks on Saturday 7th February 07:48
The maximum sentence is that available on the offence date. If the maximum sentence was increased after the offence date but before sentence then that new maximum is not available to the sentencer.

Different considerations apply to sentencing guidelines. They apply at the sentencing hearing. I’ve dealt with quite a few cases in which a harsher sentencing guideline was in force at the sentencing hearing than that available should the offender have been sentenced on the offence date.

I don’t know anything about NI. I don’t know if they have a Sentencing Council.


Jasandjules

72,172 posts

255 months

Saturday 7th February
quotequote all
If I was a parent of that child, I would shortly be in jail.

milesgiles

4,830 posts

55 months

Saturday 7th February
quotequote all
Stealing 100k doesn’t get you sent to jail either

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15536333/...

dukeboy749r

3,423 posts

236 months

Saturday 7th February
quotequote all
55palfers said:
3 years for a dodgy tweet though.
Keep that for another thread.

Taking a life by means of careless driving, being intoxicated or just speeding, should carry a minimum sentence that deters people from being tts behind the wheel.

JoshSm

4,116 posts

63 months

Saturday 7th February
quotequote all
dukeboy749r said:
Taking a life by means of careless driving, being intoxicated or just speeding, should carry a minimum sentence that deters people from being tts behind the wheel.
You're making the assumption that potential punishments act as a deterrent for idiots. They don't.

And if we want harsh consequences they should be harsh and long term.

5lab

1,873 posts

222 months

Sunday 8th February
quotequote all
The case isnt simple.

There's evidence the driver was being dangerous in the drive leading up to the crash, but not at the time of the crash, leading to the DD charge.

The big mitigating factor is that the kid ran out from behind a bus and got hit by the driver. It's very sad, but not necessarily 100% the drivers fault, hence the outcome

https://www.belfastlive.co.uk/news/supermarket-del...

poo at Paul's

14,570 posts

201 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
I heard his lunch and cutlery also ended up on the floor of his van, poor fella….

T6 vanman

3,460 posts

125 months

Tuesday 10th February
quotequote all
Another one ... this time admitting DbDD
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2lgl9dwkglo

irc

9,576 posts

162 months

Tuesday 10th February
quotequote all
5lab said:
The case isnt simple.

There's evidence the driver was being dangerous in the drive leading up to the crash, but not at the time of the crash, leading to the DD charge.

The big mitigating factor is that the kid ran out from behind a bus and got hit by the driver. It's very sad, but not necessarily 100% the drivers fault, hence the outcome

https://www.belfastlive.co.uk/news/supermarket-del...
"His insight into the effect on Aaron’s family was all the more genuine as his sister had been knocked down and killed by a taxi driver in London in 2012, the court heard."

Not enough insight to drive without his hands on his phone or his fork though.