33 years for killing your children.
33 years for killing your children.
Author
Discussion

BoRED S2upid

Original Poster:

20,763 posts

256 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
I don't want to get into another death penalty discussion but this woman who knifed to death her two daughters to get revenge on their father has just got 33 years in jail. So 16.5 years for each murder.

Seems a little light to me.

Marf

22,907 posts

257 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
I don't want to get into another death penalty discussion but this woman who knifed to death her two daughters to get revenge on their father has just got 33 years in jail. So 16.5 years for each murder.

Seems a little light to me.
If this isnt a clear cut case where the death penalty should be applied I don't know what is.

glazbagun

14,919 posts

213 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Marf said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I don't want to get into another death penalty discussion but this woman who knifed to death her two daughters to get revenge on their father has just got 33 years in jail. So 16.5 years for each murder.

Seems a little light to me.
If this isnt a clear cut case where the death penalty should be applied I don't know what is.
THat didn't last very long, did it? hehe

Marf

22,907 posts

257 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
My bad, I guess I glossed over that bit of the OP boxedin

Lefty Guns

18,433 posts

218 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Marf said:
My bad, I guess I glossed over that bit of the OP boxedin
Yeah but in fairness, you were bang-on.

Nolar Dog

8,786 posts

211 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Marf said:
My bad
Now that deserves capital punishment.

Marf

22,907 posts

257 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Nolar Dog said:
Marf said:
My bad
Now that deserves capital punishment.
silly

deckster

9,631 posts

271 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
So she's 41 now. She will, at the very earliest, be released when she's 74. There is a very good chance that the rest of her life will be behind bars.

I think that is a fair outcome, personally.

Jasandjules

71,222 posts

245 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
The only thing I would say is that 33 years is a lot longer than many get. So that's a start.

Pints

18,448 posts

210 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
The only thing I would say is that 33 years is a lot longer than many get. So that's a start.
A start would be hanging her by the neck until she's bereft of life.

BoRED S2upid

Original Poster:

20,763 posts

256 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
The only thing I would say is that 33 years is a lot longer than many get. So that's a start.
Ive seen American cases where the murderer gets 6 life sentences to run back to back, total of 150 years! hopefully that means they get burried in prison when they die.

Monki

1,233 posts

207 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Is this a proper 33 years or a "5years and then let off for good behaviour" sentance?

Jasandjules

71,222 posts

245 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
Jasandjules said:
The only thing I would say is that 33 years is a lot longer than many get. So that's a start.
Ive seen American cases where the murderer gets 6 life sentences to run back to back, total of 150 years! hopefully that means they get burried in prison when they die.
Yes, but in America life means life, over here it means 15 years.

And Pints, I am inclined to agree in the main, but that is not what the OP wished to discuss.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

247 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
Jasandjules said:
The only thing I would say is that 33 years is a lot longer than many get. So that's a start.
Ive seen American cases where the murderer gets 6 life sentences to run back to back, total of 150 years! hopefully that means they get burried in prison when they die.
That is to better ensure that if an appeal is favorable on one murder, there are others to back up the prosecution keeping the murderer locked away..

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

250 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
That sentence is somewhat more severe than that given to Myra Hindley.

Deva Link

26,934 posts

261 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
BoRED S2upid said:
Jasandjules said:
The only thing I would say is that 33 years is a lot longer than many get. So that's a start.
Ive seen American cases where the murderer gets 6 life sentences to run back to back, total of 150 years! hopefully that means they get burried in prison when they die.
Yes, but in America life means life, over here it means 15 years.
Surely they'll decide that she's not a danger to anybody else and let her out in a few years?

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

247 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
BoRED S2upid said:
Jasandjules said:
The only thing I would say is that 33 years is a lot longer than many get. So that's a start.
Ive seen American cases where the murderer gets 6 life sentences to run back to back, total of 150 years! hopefully that means they get burried in prison when they die.
Yes, but in America life means life, over here it means 15 years.

And Pints, I am inclined to agree in the main, but that is not what the OP wished to discuss.
That is true only to an extent. Certain states, mine for example, have a "life means life" policy. This means if all appeals fail, then the sentence has no chance of being shortened. Some states, however, may have systems that allow shortening of sentences for some reason or the other (most do not). Now, Federal life sentences are different still and I am not versed in their specifics.

ClaphamGT3

11,796 posts

259 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Havent read the details but I presume from this thread that her tariff has been set at 33 years, meaning that it is a reasonable approximation of how long she is actually likely to serve prior to consideration for release on licence.

Horrible, tragic case; no winners - not even her.


Jonny671

29,674 posts

205 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
deckster said:
So she's 41 now. She will, at the very earliest, be released when she's 74. There is a very good chance that the rest of her life will be behind bars.

I think that is a fair outcome, personally.
Agreed, she could get death penalty and it'll be all over.

She'll sit in prison for the rest of her life now, knowing she killed her two daughters..

I think that'll do her alot worse than a death penalty.

Parrot of Doom

23,075 posts

250 months

Tuesday 22nd September 2009
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
over here it means 15 years.
It doesn't.