The death penalty is too good for this guy...
Discussion
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8280761.stm
I remember reading about the 'burglary' after it happened and was disgusted about what had happened and felt plenty of sympathy for the victims. However, now it looks like it was the bloke who carried out the attack because he was having an affair and wanted to claim the insurance money. b
d!
I remember reading about the 'burglary' after it happened and was disgusted about what had happened and felt plenty of sympathy for the victims. However, now it looks like it was the bloke who carried out the attack because he was having an affair and wanted to claim the insurance money. b

mikechandler said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8280761.stm
I remember reading about the 'burglary' after it happened and was disgusted about what had happened and felt plenty of sympathy for the victims. However, now it looks like it was the bloke who carried out the attack because he was having an affair and wanted to claim the insurance money. b
d!
No need for a trial then?I remember reading about the 'burglary' after it happened and was disgusted about what had happened and felt plenty of sympathy for the victims. However, now it looks like it was the bloke who carried out the attack because he was having an affair and wanted to claim the insurance money. b

esselte said:
mikechandler said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8280761.stm
I remember reading about the 'burglary' after it happened and was disgusted about what had happened and felt plenty of sympathy for the victims. However, now it looks like it was the bloke who carried out the attack because he was having an affair and wanted to claim the insurance money. b
d!
No need for a trial then?I remember reading about the 'burglary' after it happened and was disgusted about what had happened and felt plenty of sympathy for the victims. However, now it looks like it was the bloke who carried out the attack because he was having an affair and wanted to claim the insurance money. b


I read an article recently where the police were convinced they had the evidence against him. Obviously, I am looking at this along the lines of him being found guilty. Perhaps I shouldn't be so blinkered
If this guy did do it, how daft is he when there is allegedly 100s of texts to another woman? Surely he knew they would check it out?
So maybe he didn't do it..? Or maybe he thought that's what they'd think, ie that he would be daft to have done this?
Oh and if he was having an affair whilst his missus was 38 weeks preggers, he's a toad regardless of whether he tried to murder her!!
So maybe he didn't do it..? Or maybe he thought that's what they'd think, ie that he would be daft to have done this?
Oh and if he was having an affair whilst his missus was 38 weeks preggers, he's a toad regardless of whether he tried to murder her!!
Apparently he was a 'preening' and 'muscle-bound'. Thinking personal trainer, professional athlete, maybe some sort of manual worker?
Nope, he's a 'footpaths inspector'. WTF does that do?
Oh, and a disgusting waste of oxygen. I'm with you OP. Key in bin job, or let him swing. Either way is fine.
Nope, he's a 'footpaths inspector'. WTF does that do?
Oh, and a disgusting waste of oxygen. I'm with you OP. Key in bin job, or let him swing. Either way is fine.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff