Tax to save the planet
Author
Discussion

rypt

Original Poster:

2,548 posts

206 months

Monday 12th October 2009
quotequote all
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/...

useless people said:
The speed limit on all motorways should be strictly enforced and may have to be reduced to 60mph to help to meet the Government’s legally binding carbon reduction targets.
Seriously, WHY must they try to piss us the motorists off, constantly, 24/7, without fail.

EDIT: Not sure if this was already posted before

Edited by rypt on Monday 12th October 21:43

Jasandjules

71,229 posts

245 months

Monday 12th October 2009
quotequote all
Read the important bit, "strictly enforced" - i.e. loads more cameras therefore = more tax. This would be needed to compensate for the loss of fuel revenue.........


Elysium

16,065 posts

203 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Read the important bit, "strictly enforced" - i.e. loads more cameras therefore = more tax. This would be needed to compensate for the loss of fuel revenue.........
If the government was truly interested in reducing global CO2 emissions, they could just invest a proportion of current fuel and road tax in energy saving projects.

We should be tackling CO2 emissions based on cost per tonne of CO2 averted. I have no doubt at all that this would be one of the most expensive and least efficient options available.



Guybrush

4,364 posts

222 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
The government is making a big assumption that CO2 affects the climate in the way they say it does - and thousands of scientists doubt it does. Anyway, even if CO2 did have such an effect, the 3% that man contributes to the 0.038% currently in the atmosphere is miniscule (and bear in mund that cars contribute a fraction of that 3%). It's almost as if the whole thing was a tax-raising excuse. rolleyes