Two excellent articles in The Guardian
Discussion
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/oct/20/governmen...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/oct/20/trafficki...
Never through I would write that. Well worth your time reading.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/oct/20/trafficki...
Never through I would write that. Well worth your time reading.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/83...
Paxman grilling someone over it.
Paxman grilling someone over it.
Edited by Shay HTFC on Thursday 22 October 16:01
Shay HTFC said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/83...
Paxman grilling someone over it.
Excellent, Paxo on top form there.Paxman grilling someone over it.
Edited by Shay HTFC on Thursday 22 October 16:01
turbobloke said:
Good finds.
Yet more proof of Mencken's view that the fundamental aim of practical politics...
Even the Romans knew that.Yet more proof of Mencken's view that the fundamental aim of practical politics...
H L Mencken said:
...is to keep the populace alarmed, and hence clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins all of them imaginary
Interesting articles
There is allot of hysteria about Prostitution in this country. A combination of an old moral objection to the practice with a new Feminist agenda to end the 'exploitation' of women.
Generous rates of pay ensures that there is no shortage of willing workers in the industry. I'm sure there are some women forced into it aginst their will, but far less than media hysteria would have you believe.
Ultimatly if the government wanted to protect women in the industry they would legalise brothels and so help ensure that the women are both willing and over the age of 18.
But of course to do that they would have to actually want to help them rather than indulge in political posturing.
There is allot of hysteria about Prostitution in this country. A combination of an old moral objection to the practice with a new Feminist agenda to end the 'exploitation' of women.
Generous rates of pay ensures that there is no shortage of willing workers in the industry. I'm sure there are some women forced into it aginst their will, but far less than media hysteria would have you believe.
Ultimatly if the government wanted to protect women in the industry they would legalise brothels and so help ensure that the women are both willing and over the age of 18.
But of course to do that they would have to actually want to help them rather than indulge in political posturing.
turbobloke said:
Good finds.
Yet more proof of Mencken's view that the fundamental aim of practical politics...
1984. Read it and be very afraid.Yet more proof of Mencken's view that the fundamental aim of practical politics...
H L Mencken said:
...is to keep the populace alarmed, and hence clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins all of them imaginary
JagLover said:
Ultimatly if the government wanted to protect women in the industry they would legalise brothels and so help ensure that the women are both willing and over the age of 18.
But of course to do that they would have to actually want to help them rather than indulge in political posturing.
100% agree with you.But of course to do that they would have to actually want to help them rather than indulge in political posturing.
Eric Mc said:
turbobloke said:
Good finds.
Yet more proof of Mencken's view that the fundamental aim of practical politics...
Even the Romans knew that.Yet more proof of Mencken's view that the fundamental aim of practical politics...
H L Mencken said:
...is to keep the populace alarmed, and hence clamorous to be led to safety, by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins all of them imaginary
I saw the Paxman interview it was great. Those are both good articles from the Guardian.
Slightly off topic but The Guardian has some excellent podcasts. The Science and technology ones are great as is their cycling one.
Obviously the paper is just for communists but it's not all bad.
Slightly off topic but The Guardian has some excellent podcasts. The Science and technology ones are great as is their cycling one.
Obviously the paper is just for communists but it's not all bad.

Edited by el stovey on Friday 23 October 09:54
el stovey said:
I saw the Paxman interview it was great. Those are both good articles from the Guardian.
Slightly off topic but The Guardian has some excellent podcasts. The Science and technology ones are great as is their cycling one.
Obviously the paper is just for communists but it's not all bad.
I don't tend to stick to one particular newspaper but find the Guardian often has much better written and neutral articles compared to the Times or Telegraph for example; particularly in the areas of science, technology and the arts.Slightly off topic but The Guardian has some excellent podcasts. The Science and technology ones are great as is their cycling one.
Obviously the paper is just for communists but it's not all bad.

Edited by el stovey on Friday 23 October 09:54
I've never understood why people only stick to one paper for their whole life and band all the mainstream newspapers (of worthy) into particular social/political bands. Obviously they are influenced by one means or another, but in general it comes down to the particular article at any given time, not the supposed political allegiance. And by reading different papers over a period this in effect cancels this bias out anyway.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


