Protesters storme the BBC over Nick Griifin
Protesters storme the BBC over Nick Griifin
Author
Discussion

Lord Flathead

Original Poster:

1,288 posts

196 months

Jasandjules

71,251 posts

246 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
It's yet again the Lefties who wish to stifle Freedom of Speech for any view with which they disagree.

DSM2

3,624 posts

217 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
It's yet again the Lefties who wish to stifle Freedom of Speech for any view with which they disagree.
+1. Worse than the BNP.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

205 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
That's the old story from about 6pm, with The Young Ones getting pulled across the floor

hidetheelephants

30,920 posts

210 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
I was particularly amused by the footage of the harpy being dragged out of the foyer of Television Centre, squawking about shame or something...

shoutPot, this is Kettle; colour sit-rep required.

An irony that has obviously passed by the crusties crowding around outside is that the enormous amount of extra media coverage caused by the demonstration has given the BNP a whole lot more publicity than the appearance on QT ever would have. The likely converts to the BNP(thickies mainly) generally don't watch QT, and this appearance would not have raised so much as a blip on their radar; the mass protest and fuss has been heavily covered by the redtop chipwrappers and the rest of the MSM, which the thickies do occasionally pay attention to.

The reporters reporting from outside were practically milming their pants at the spectacle; there isn't a hole deep enough to house these 'meedja' cretins. The cynic in me is sad at this; the BBC have made news by allowing the BNP on QT; schizophrenically, the BBC then report on this; crusties riot outside, which is also reported on by the BBC. If I was a conspiracy nut, I would say they have done it deliberately...

Nigel Worc's

8,121 posts

205 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
DSM2 said:
Jasandjules said:
It's yet again the Lefties who wish to stifle Freedom of Speech for any view with which they disagree.
+1. Worse than the BNP.
+2

Martin Keene

10,478 posts

242 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
Nigel Worc's said:
DSM2 said:
Jasandjules said:
It's yet again the Lefties who wish to stifle Freedom of Speech for any view with which they disagree.
+1. Worse than the BNP.
+2
+3.

What makes me mad is these tcensoreds have yet to work out the same freedom of speech that allows them to protest about Nick Griffin being on Question Time, is exactly the same reason the BBC can't just say no to him going on there.

Wcensoredkers

MiniMan64

18,346 posts

207 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all

KANEIT

2,846 posts

236 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
He lied!

sstein

6,249 posts

271 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
This reminds of those idiot protestors with the placards that said something like "To Hell with free speech".

Magnificent irony.

IforB

9,840 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Idiots.

jp1982

300 posts

216 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Wait for the news in few days complaining of police brutality,

rolleyes

MiniMan64

18,346 posts

207 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
jp1982 said:
Wait for the news in few days complaining of police brutality,

rolleyes
They already have. You can't have a good protest without a bit of breaking and entering.

XJSJohn

16,093 posts

236 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
BBC said:
The justice secretary said when anybody put a specific quotation to Mr Griffin he tried to "wriggle out of it".
But isn't that what every politician does when faced with unpleasant questions?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/832115...

There is some huge hypocracy going on there from other politicians and others there. The BNP is a recognised political party with some very good and some very bad policy, no different to any other political group, so why are they attacked in such a way, fear of a potential viable threat?

Not saying that I support BNP here, but its interesting how they are treated by comparison.

dilbert

7,741 posts

248 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
XJSJohn said:
BBC said:
The justice secretary said when anybody put a specific quotation to Mr Griffin he tried to "wriggle out of it".
But isn't that what every politician does when faced with unpleasant questions?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/832115...

There is some huge hypocracy going on there from other politicians and others there. The BNP is a recognised political party with some very good and some very bad policy, no different to any other political group, so why are they attacked in such a way, fear of a potential viable threat?

Not saying that I support BNP here, but its interesting how they are treated by comparison.
If they had asked Nick Griffin about Transport, The Environment or Enterprise, heck anything, he'd have looked dumb. Hopefully, if there's a next time, someone will?
As it was, the public, the politicians, and Bonnie Greer, were all dumber than Nick Griffin.
I swear the only person I saw tonight with any brain at all was Dimbleby, and he can't ask the damn questions, only read out other peoples! How many people must there have been?

I think it's called the hypocrisy of persecution, and boy did Nick do well. The only way he could have done better would be if they had stood him in the corner with a dunce's hat on. The BBC had the sense not to do that.

I think the only chance Labour has is to ban him from being on TV. Jack Straw is the best that Labour have, and he wasn't it. He tried, I accept. Personally, of anyone on that panel, I'm standing by Nick Griffin even though I don't like him, or what he thinks.

If nothing else, Nick Griffin is the only politician I can remember who is straight enough to say "I don't know". For all you sensitive lefties out there, the correct next question is not laughter or booing. The correct next question is "How can we help you work it out?".

How about that?

If you want you can tell me how I'm wrong and everything, but in the end it's not my role in life to ask those questions. The only reason I can say that, is as a result of my own experience of Labour, and the way the middle and upper classes have treated me. As a result of these things I took a post in the heart of the civil service. I was optimistic, but in the end saw what the politicians are doing. It pretty nearly makes me want to vomit. Needless to say I left them to it, but my last hope of any career was crashed and burning.

I'll take my chances thanks. You can fight it out with the BNP if you want.

No matter what you think of me, it's perhaps worth thinking about that mentality.

Adios. (but I hope it doesn't end this way)

Edited by dilbert on Friday 23 October 05:14

JMGS4

8,845 posts

287 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Nigel Worc's said:
DSM2 said:
Jasandjules said:
It's yet again the Lefties who wish to stifle Freedom of Speech for any view with which they disagree.
+1. Worse than the BNP.
+2
+3

Busa_Rush

6,930 posts

268 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
JMGS4 said:
Nigel Worc's said:
DSM2 said:
Jasandjules said:
It's yet again the Lefties who wish to stifle Freedom of Speech for any view with which they disagree.
+1. Worse than the BNP.
+2
+3
+4

dern

14,055 posts

296 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Martin Keene said:
Nigel Worc's said:
DSM2 said:
Jasandjules said:
It's yet again the Lefties who wish to stifle Freedom of Speech for any view with which they disagree.
+1. Worse than the BNP.
+2
+3.

What makes me mad is these tcensoreds have yet to work out the same freedom of speech that allows them to protest about Nick Griffin being on Question Time, is exactly the same reason the BBC can't just say no to him going on there.

Wcensoredkers
Protest is 'worse than the bnp'? You cretins.

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

234 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
dern said:
Martin Keene said:
Nigel Worc's said:
DSM2 said:
Jasandjules said:
It's yet again the Lefties who wish to stifle Freedom of Speech for any view with which they disagree.
+1. Worse than the BNP.
+2
+3.

What makes me mad is these tcensoreds have yet to work out the same freedom of speech that allows them to protest about Nick Griffin being on Question Time, is exactly the same reason the BBC can't just say no to him going on there.

Wcensoredkers
Protest is 'worse than the bnp'? You cretins.
Unelected shadow organisation with unknown funding, desperately trying to prevent the leader of a known fringe group from speaking and therefore denying people the opportunity to hear what they have to say and then laugh at it, as a side effect in the process generate massive amounts of publicity for the fringe group.

Yep I'd say the protestors were worse, now it’s the BNP, who would be next UKIP / Eurosceptics, anybody disagreeing with climate change........................... it’s a damn slippery slope and the protestors along with their alleged labour paymasters are determined to push us all down it.





Edited by AndrewW-G on Friday 23 October 10:22

dern

14,055 posts

296 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
AndrewW-G said:
dern said:
Martin Keene said:
Nigel Worc's said:
DSM2 said:
Jasandjules said:
It's yet again the Lefties who wish to stifle Freedom of Speech for any view with which they disagree.
+1. Worse than the BNP.
+2
+3.

What makes me mad is these tcensoreds have yet to work out the same freedom of speech that allows them to protest about Nick Griffin being on Question Time, is exactly the same reason the BBC can't just say no to him going on there.

Wcensoredkers
Protest is 'worse than the bnp'? You cretins.
Unelected shadow organisation with unkown funding, desperatly trying to prevent the leader of a known fringe group from speaking and therefore denying people the opportunity to hear what they have to say and then laught at it and in the process generate massive ammounts of publicity for the fringe group. Yep I'd say the protestors were worse.
Do you genuinely believe that a few hundred people who are demostrating on a single issue with an unattainable aim of stopping someone speaking is actually 'worse' than the BNP... a political party whose policies are grounded in rasicm and homophobia? Are you honestly saying that a handful of the unwashed who feel passionately enough about a subject to kick up a bit of a fuss is 'worse' than a party that came from the national front who are now trying to gain respectability by lying about their real aims and their real motivations?