Water found on the moon
Discussion
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.
IMHO
IMHO

FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.
IMHO
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon. IMHO

NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.
IMHO
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon. IMHO

Don said:
Getting in and out of gravity wells is the bummer. OK elsewhere as nuclear rockets work, apparently. Hard to do that without poisoning the atmosphere with nuclear fallout, though, so you can't really use the technology to leave Earth.
Well, you probably could use one. Nukes are pretty clean these days. IIRC one launch of a big Orion is no worse than the annual output of a couple of coal fired power stations. Fat chance of getting international agreement though. It will have to be assembled in orbit.s2art said:
NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.
IMHO
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon. IMHO

Or of course use a space elevator form of technology using the same materials. More here too - http://blogs.kentlaw.edu/islat/2009/01/space-eleva...
Or something along those lines and before anyone says it can't be done. Think and take a good look, not at what we have done in the last 100 years, but what we have created in the last 30 years. Then think what could be achieved in the next 30.

NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.
IMHO
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon. IMHO

ErnestM said:
NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.
IMHO
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon. IMHO

Hmmm. Not the most serious thread, but...
There is still no air, either to breath or to glide down without burning fuel. And, we still have to burn fuel to get off. So the gravity well problem remains. It is interesting, but I don't think it changes the basics- a base in space itself makes much more sense.
There is still no air, either to breath or to glide down without burning fuel. And, we still have to burn fuel to get off. So the gravity well problem remains. It is interesting, but I don't think it changes the basics- a base in space itself makes much more sense.
NismoGT said:
ErnestM said:
NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.
IMHO
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon. IMHO

*these people are also crazy.
grumbledoak said:
Hmmm. Not the most serious thread, but...
There is still no air, either to breath or to glide down without burning fuel. And, we still have to burn fuel to get off. So the gravity well problem remains. It is interesting, but I don't think it changes the basics- a base in space itself makes much more sense.
The big thing I've heard is that it may be possible to produce rocket fuel from the water there. That's a good thing as we can build rockets to get to the moon, then from there launch into the big beyond, rather than having to lug the fuel to get to the big beyond out of Earth's gravity. I assume we can also use Hydrogen fuel cells for a bit more power than solar alone can provide?There is still no air, either to breath or to glide down without burning fuel. And, we still have to burn fuel to get off. So the gravity well problem remains. It is interesting, but I don't think it changes the basics- a base in space itself makes much more sense.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/090925-moon-...
for a bit more info.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff