Water found on the moon
Author
Discussion

sleep envy

Original Poster:

62,260 posts

266 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
So what does this mean to us?

Will we be able to sustain life on the moon?

s2art

18,942 posts

270 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
So what does this mean to us?

Will we be able to sustain life on the moon?
After a Godzillion dollar investment, yes.

FourWheelDrift

91,129 posts

301 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.

IMHO smile

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

272 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
Will we be able to sustain life on the moon?
Let's stick Gordon Brown up there and see...

NismoGT

1,634 posts

207 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.

IMHO smile
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon.

s2art

18,942 posts

270 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.

IMHO smile
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon.
Once you are orbit, you are half way to anywhere. Its just time taken after that. As for that I give you the Orion nuclear powered spacecraft! Fast, cheap (relatively) and effing huge.

Don

28,378 posts

301 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
Getting in and out of gravity wells is the bummer. OK elsewhere as nuclear rockets work, apparently. Hard to do that without poisoning the atmosphere with nuclear fallout, though, so you can't really use the technology to leave Earth.


s2art

18,942 posts

270 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
Don said:
Getting in and out of gravity wells is the bummer. OK elsewhere as nuclear rockets work, apparently. Hard to do that without poisoning the atmosphere with nuclear fallout, though, so you can't really use the technology to leave Earth.
Well, you probably could use one. Nukes are pretty clean these days. IIRC one launch of a big Orion is no worse than the annual output of a couple of coal fired power stations. Fat chance of getting international agreement though. It will have to be assembled in orbit.

FourWheelDrift

91,129 posts

301 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
s2art said:
NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.

IMHO smile
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon.
Once you are orbit, you are half way to anywhere. Its just time taken after that. As for that I give you the Orion nuclear powered spacecraft! Fast, cheap (relatively) and effing huge.
Build an orbiting space port, then use a series of carbon nano tube pipelines from the earth to the space port and fuel can be pumped down for refining if it isn't done at Titan or at the space port.

Or of course use a space elevator form of technology using the same materials. More here too - http://blogs.kentlaw.edu/islat/2009/01/space-eleva...

Or something along those lines and before anyone says it can't be done. Think and take a good look, not at what we have done in the last 100 years, but what we have created in the last 30 years. Then think what could be achieved in the next 30. smile

bonsai

2,015 posts

197 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
I think it's great news. In light of the recent fears about Obama scrapping the proposed moon landings, this can only help prevent that.

ErnestM

11,621 posts

284 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.

IMHO smile
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon.
IIRC it's not ore but actually liquid methane. Clouds rain methane and it collects in virtual oceans of the stuff. No oxygen on Titan so limited danger of combustion. I'm with FourWheelDrift, let's get it....!

NismoGT

1,634 posts

207 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
ErnestM said:
NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.

IMHO smile
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon.
IIRC it's not ore but actually liquid methane. Clouds rain methane and it collects in virtual oceans of the stuff. No oxygen on Titan so limited danger of combustion. I'm with FourWheelDrift, let's get it....!
Need to employ Captain Picard and Janeway to stop Alien do-badder's trying to half inch our resources

FourWheelDrift

91,129 posts

301 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
Then cue the pro-Titan mentalists trying to protect the environment. I'd like to see them do a sit in protest biggrin

NismoGT

1,634 posts

207 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Then cue the pro-Titan mentalists trying to protect the environment. I'd like to see them do a sit in protest biggrin
Plenty of Black Holes around. Be very easy to get rid of them

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

221 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
So what does this mean to us?
More tax?

Well everything else does

grumbledoak

32,200 posts

250 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
Hmmm. Not the most serious thread, but...

There is still no air, either to breath or to glide down without burning fuel. And, we still have to burn fuel to get off. So the gravity well problem remains. It is interesting, but I don't think it changes the basics- a base in space itself makes much more sense.

EDLT

15,421 posts

223 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
NismoGT said:
ErnestM said:
NismoGT said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I think we should be looking further afield than the rock orbiting us. There's more hydrocarbon based fuels on Titan (moon of Saturn) than all the Earth's oil & gas reserves, so getting to Titan and mining it would be a more useful mission with a real and important target than trying to live on the moon.

IMHO smile
What method would you have of returning the ore to earth? The cost of that would surely sore further than colonising the moon.
IIRC it's not ore but actually liquid methane. Clouds rain methane and it collects in virtual oceans of the stuff. No oxygen on Titan so limited danger of combustion. I'm with FourWheelDrift, let's get it....!
Need to employ Captain Picard and Janeway to stop Alien do-badder's trying to half inch our resources
People claim to have spotted UFOs flying past the sun*, so maybe they were on their way to Titan. DUM DUM DUM.

*these people are also crazy.

FourWheelDrift

91,129 posts

301 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
Shell have a station there with a 24hr mini-mart.

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

226 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all

FunkyNige

9,558 posts

292 months

Friday 13th November 2009
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Hmmm. Not the most serious thread, but...

There is still no air, either to breath or to glide down without burning fuel. And, we still have to burn fuel to get off. So the gravity well problem remains. It is interesting, but I don't think it changes the basics- a base in space itself makes much more sense.
The big thing I've heard is that it may be possible to produce rocket fuel from the water there. That's a good thing as we can build rockets to get to the moon, then from there launch into the big beyond, rather than having to lug the fuel to get to the big beyond out of Earth's gravity. I assume we can also use Hydrogen fuel cells for a bit more power than solar alone can provide?

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/090925-moon-...
for a bit more info.