What a great leap forward for women police officers!
Discussion
Mr_annie_vxr said:
If it's a conviction for theft unless some severe underlying mental health issue then it should be dismissal. If it's the former then it may not be clear cut.
Surely though if someone in that position is found to have "severe underlying mental health issues" then they'd be expected to resign on medical grounds. No-one wants a self-classified nutcase chief inspector?Edited by Frederick on Saturday 28th November 14:40
Frederick said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
If it's a conviction for theft unless some severe underlying mental health issue then it should be dismissal. If it's the former then it may not be clear cut.
Surely though if someone in that position is found to have "severe underlying mental health issues" then they'd be expected to resign on medical grounds. No-one wants a self-classified nutcase chief inspector?Edited by Frederick on Saturday 28th November 14:40
People can go through a period in their life where, for some reason or other, they can experience mental health issues. They can also recover from these problems, if treated properly.
It is far too early in this case to be casting judgement on this individual's behaviour. That will be for the medical people - and possibly the courts - to decide.
It is far too early in this case to be casting judgement on this individual's behaviour. That will be for the medical people - and possibly the courts - to decide.
Eric Mc said:
People can go through a period in their life where, for some reason or other, they can experience mental health issues. They can also recover from these problems, if treated properly.
It is far too early in this case to be casting judgement on this individual's behaviour. That will be for the medical people - and possibly the courts - to decide.
Absolutely correct Eric, this woman has, for some reason, totally inverted her lifestyle. It is far too early in this case to be casting judgement on this individual's behaviour. That will be for the medical people - and possibly the courts - to decide.
Most odd though, does make you wonder.
"The Mental"?
esselte said:
Frederick said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
If it's a conviction for theft unless some severe underlying mental health issue then it should be dismissal. If it's the former then it may not be clear cut.
Surely though if someone in that position is found to have "severe underlying mental health issues" then they'd be expected to resign on medical grounds. No-one wants a self-classified nutcase chief inspector?Edited by Frederick on Saturday 28th November 14:40
Surely she'd keep what she had accrued to the date of dismissal?
Kermit power said:
If she's found guilty, is that not an automatic sacking for a police officer?
Seems not:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7936041.stm
cymtriks said:
esselte said:
Frederick said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
If it's a conviction for theft unless some severe underlying mental health issue then it should be dismissal. If it's the former then it may not be clear cut.
Surely though if someone in that position is found to have "severe underlying mental health issues" then they'd be expected to resign on medical grounds. No-one wants a self-classified nutcase chief inspector?Edited by Frederick on Saturday 28th November 14:40
Surely she'd keep what she had accrued to the date of dismissal?
Edited by esselte on Saturday 28th November 19:59
Here we go again with that badly written article and selective figures. It doesn't reflect the nature of convictions. Whether they are spent etc prior to starting in the police. It also does not state whether they relate to offences concerning arrests of offenders where officers get it wrong. I know an officer convicted of common assault and public orde after grabbing hold of a person who was damaging his car and calling him a little s
t. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job?
In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
t. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job? In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
Mr_annie_vxr said:
Here we go again with that badly written article and selective figures. It doesn't reflect the nature of convictions. Whether they are spent etc prior to starting in the police. It also does not state whether they relate to offences concerning arrests of offenders where officers get it wrong. I know an officer convicted of common assault and public orde after grabbing hold of a person who was damaging his car and calling him a little st. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job?
In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
Why will her pension go? Would it she was physically ill?t. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job? In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
Kermit power said:
Oh dear.eldar said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
Here we go again with that badly written article and selective figures. It doesn't reflect the nature of convictions. Whether they are spent etc prior to starting in the police. It also does not state whether they relate to offences concerning arrests of offenders where officers get it wrong. I know an officer convicted of common assault and public orde after grabbing hold of a person who was damaging his car and calling him a little st. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job?
In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
Why will her pension go? Would it she was physically ill?t. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job? In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
esselte said:
eldar said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
Here we go again with that badly written article and selective figures. It doesn't reflect the nature of convictions. Whether they are spent etc prior to starting in the police. It also does not state whether they relate to offences concerning arrests of offenders where officers get it wrong. I know an officer convicted of common assault and public orde after grabbing hold of a person who was damaging his car and calling him a little st. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job?
In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
Why will her pension go? Would it she was physically ill?t. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job? In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
eldar said:
esselte said:
eldar said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
Here we go again with that badly written article and selective figures. It doesn't reflect the nature of convictions. Whether they are spent etc prior to starting in the police. It also does not state whether they relate to offences concerning arrests of offenders where officers get it wrong. I know an officer convicted of common assault and public orde after grabbing hold of a person who was damaging his car and calling him a little st. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job?
In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
Why will her pension go? Would it she was physically ill?t. It was a technicality on the assault and the word st was enough for s5. He is an excellent hard working officer. Should he lose his job? In this case unless she's mentally ill she will be gone. As will most of her pension.
k up you cannot get it until 60 or 65 etc etc. You massively screw yourself. Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff