"Don't wreck the recovery" pleads Brown!!
Discussion
http://itn.co.uk/74c86bab0b6a4f28219a343563b8028d....
Which receovery would this be then? The one we were best placed to come out of first of the one from the downturn we were never in as you'd solved boom & bust economies??!!
Which receovery would this be then? The one we were best placed to come out of first of the one from the downturn we were never in as you'd solved boom & bust economies??!!
Didn't you know? The recession is over, Gordon said so:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...
grumbledoak said:
He is shameless. The tosser put us in this situation, and in all likelihood won't be PM when someone else tries to clear up his Socialist inspired economic disaster. And he's asking us not to wreck the economy?
I like how he implies by voting for someone else we'll be wrecking the economy.When all else fails, guilt people into doing what you want.
anonymous said:
[redacted]
One where he has never had to be truly responsible for balancing a budget.Whether private or public.
He comes from the "old" Left, one that really doesn't understand the process of wealth creation. One that believes wealth redistribution is merely about tax and benefits.
Rremember, current hopes are on the "Green" technology, creating jobs.
Which it wont.
Only leaves the Public Sector then?
Oops, once more are we not hearing about greater efficiency here?
All nonsense spin.
Not that I believe any other Party can chart a course for the UK.
It would be nice to think (though I think it is just fanciful wishful propaganda) that in the same way Labour inherited an economy that had begun to turn in 1997 from Major's government, that ran out of time before the electorate realised it had turned, or had forgiven the tories for) CMD would be inheriting an economy that they could benefit from it.
Unfortunately there's clearly such a hole in the public finances that we may not yet have really suffered the real pain yet. After all there is no prospect of both economic growth and/or a fiscal surplus Nulabour squandered on their post 97 spending spree and grand social experiment, any time soon.
After all we're already seeing leaks of, and/or scaremongering by the Daily Wail, that we (motorists, like we don't vote!) are going to be clobbered as part (and it can only be a small part) to plugging the hole in the public spending, and there's sure to be an emergency budget not matter what colour gets returned.
Unfortunately there's clearly such a hole in the public finances that we may not yet have really suffered the real pain yet. After all there is no prospect of both economic growth and/or a fiscal surplus Nulabour squandered on their post 97 spending spree and grand social experiment, any time soon.
After all we're already seeing leaks of, and/or scaremongering by the Daily Wail, that we (motorists, like we don't vote!) are going to be clobbered as part (and it can only be a small part) to plugging the hole in the public spending, and there's sure to be an emergency budget not matter what colour gets returned.
Oakey said:
Didn't you know? The recession is over, Gordon said so:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...
Isn't he himself one of the 'priviledged few'?http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...
groucho said:
Oakey said:
Didn't you know? The recession is over, Gordon said so:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...
Isn't he himself one of the 'priviledged few'?http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...
In his mind, no.
That though always is the case with "Leaders".
Our, as the "led", burden, through history.
Edited by WhoseGeneration on Wednesday 30th December 20:51
WhoseGeneration said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
One where he has never had to be truly responsible for balancing a budget.Whether private or public.
He comes from the "old" Left, one that really doesn't understand the process of wealth creation. One that believes wealth redistribution is merely about tax and benefits.
Rremember, current hopes are on the "Green" technology, creating jobs.
Which it wont.
Only leaves the Public Sector then?
Oops, once more are we not hearing about greater efficiency here?
All nonsense spin.
Not that I believe any other Party can chart a course for the UK.
WhoseGeneration said:
Jimbeaux said:
That "green technology creating jobs" is a favorite tagline of Lord Obama over here. God help us.
I want fusion powered cars and 'planes.I doubt that is the aim.
So, what do they mean?
Do they know?
Who advises them?
Jimbeaux said:
Short sighted activists straight out of the ivory towers of academia, certainly not anyone remotely associated with the realities of commerce.
Maybe they should look to others in Academia, those engaged in Science, Engineering and the applications of those disciplines?I do think there are opportunities for more efficient use of resources but do not believe that the current thrust is in the correct direction.
The danger is, as most here are aware, is of the West crippling itself with "Greenness", whilst the East carries on much as before, to greater profit.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff







