Expenses MP Chaytor is right in the do-do
Discussion
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...
Times said:
A LABOUR MP pretended his daughter was his landlord so he could claim almost £13,000 in expenses from the Commons for “renting” a flat that he himself owned.
David Chaytor, MP for Bury North, drew up a tenancy agreement with his daughter but disguised their relationship by giving her middle name as her surname.
Land Registry records show that Chaytor and his wife were the real owners of the property and there was no reason to claim his rent from the Commons. The mortgage had been paid off.
The disclosure suggests that the fraud allegations against Chaytor may be more serious than previously thought.
Understatement!David Chaytor, MP for Bury North, drew up a tenancy agreement with his daughter but disguised their relationship by giving her middle name as her surname.
Land Registry records show that Chaytor and his wife were the real owners of the property and there was no reason to claim his rent from the Commons. The mortgage had been paid off.
The disclosure suggests that the fraud allegations against Chaytor may be more serious than previously thought.
Mondeohdear said:
The jiffle king said:
On the assumption this is all true, then he might find himself in a little trouble. Just how many homes does this guy own?
I love the way his lawyer is apparently trying to claim "parliamentary privilege." These
s really do think they're above the law.
Eric Mc said:
Nice to see a lABOUR MP standing by his socialist principles.
You'd do well if you could find a SINGLE Labour MP who actually stood by his/her socialist principles. Mainly because socialism sucks. However, this man HAS to go to jail for fraud here, if not, I would like to see rioting in the streets.
Should have shredded all his expense forms so that no-one could see them (a la Billy Liar) because, of course no organisation of any sort would hold copies or other receipts in any office or filing systems of expenses paid out, would they?
Just as I'm sure there's no obligation for companies and businesses to do so because the 'Revenue' aren't interested in 'petty' stuff like that are they?
Just as I'm sure there's no obligation for companies and businesses to do so because the 'Revenue' aren't interested in 'petty' stuff like that are they?

Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






