14 kids and want's more

[crofty1984]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1251070/Th...

Interesting article. I have a feeling what was written was not what the "mother" intended!

Anyway, that aside, how can not working pay so well?

[crofty1984]

If I don't reply for a while, it's because I have just noticed the errant apostrophe in the title and will be outside naked in the snow, flaying myself.

[Don]

crofty1984 said:

If I don't reply for a while, it's because I have just noticed the errant apostrophe in the title and will be outside naked in the snow, flaying myself.

Good man. On you go. We'll all still be here when you get back.

[TankRizzo]

Dear lord.

[Tangent Police]

You can see the council-gene there

[nonplussed]

Don said:

crofty1984 said:

If I don't reply for a while, it's because I have just noticed the errant apostrophe in the title and will be outside naked in the snow, flaying myself.

Good man. On you go. We'll all still be here when you get back.

+1. It's about having standards. And you clearly do.

[Dave^]

I know you shouldn't judge a book by its cover... but...



And before anyone starts, yes I am a handsome bd!!

[Wheelrepairit]

Is Toney pregnant^^^^^^^^^^

[Dave^]

Beer Special Brew Gut...

[eyebeebe]

I may be having an attack of the stupid's [sic], but I can't see anything in the article, which explains why the children are being confiscated, apart from her being a mouth-breather.

Anyone less comprehensionally-challenged than me able to help?

[don4l]

crofty1984 said:

If I don't reply for a while, it's because I have just noticed the errant apostrophe in the title and will be outside naked in the snow, flaying myself.

Quite right too! It is one of the worst apostrophe errors that I have ever see.

There seems to be a lot of Don's in this thread.


Don
--

[Hedders]

TankRizzo said:

Dear lord.

He really needs a haircut.

[Halb]

said:

Miss Savicki, whose children are by several fathers, expected the American public to be appalled at what she claims to have been subjected to. Instead, they were appalled at her temerity to begin a lawsuit.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1251070/Th...

that backfired then

[Bing o]

Why are poor people always so frightfully ugly?

[Dave^]

eyebeebe]I may be having an attack of the stupid's [sic said:

, but I can't see anything in the article, which explains why the children are being confiscated, apart from her being a mouth-breather.

Anyone less comprehensionally-challenged than me able to help?

Have a Google, she was in the News a while back...

ie - http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2564692/...

Edited by Dave^ on Monday 15th February 16:01

[nonplussed]

Bing o said:

Why are poor people always so frightfully ugly?

I don't know but I certainly resemble that remark.

[Tangent Police]

What was it that Darwin said about stuff that bred the most being the best suited to it's environment.

Face the facts, she has got it right and you lot are doing it all wrong



The human equivalent of seagulls genes have a bigger place in the future than yours!

Edited by Tangent Police on Monday 15th February 16:14

[AndrewW-G]

Bing o said:

Why are poor people always so frightfully ugly?

Bad diet, no money for grooming products, no money for decent haircut / dye etc, no money for decent clothes that fit.................................... and of course genetics, poor + pretty + smart = socially mobile (who hasn’t taken out a pretty but poor girl?) poor + ugly + stupid = only gets invited to social occasions as part of the waiting or cleaning staff, meaning that ugly poor people tend to have ugly children (sweeping generalisation, please flame away)

[YAD061]

Christ, that's a lived in face considering she's spent all of life shagging or/and watching TV.

Victim of a fked up childhood creating another generation of victims, time to break the chain,

[DonnyMac]

Tangent Police said:

You can see the council-gene there

Looks more like an Audrey to me.

I'm another Don for the thread...