BNP and their discrimition in constitution.
Discussion
Mojoooo have you not been watching the news (guess not everyone has the day off) . Ok BNP have been hauled infront have been pulled infront of race equality committee as they disagree with the bnp constitution and had therefore demanded they change the rules of their constitution and banned them from taking on new members.
Mojooo said:
Yea I have been following the news
I was wodnering who you were reffering to when he said he makes a lot of sense, the judge or dick griffin (see what i did there).
YupI was wodnering who you were reffering to when he said he makes a lot of sense, the judge or dick griffin (see what i did there).
Nick Griffin tbh. Yes i realise he's a slimebag but yet he makes a hell of a lot of sense in what he says. Its a crime to talk about immigration or race etc etc. His comment about how labour fast track anyone none white in their party being racist etc.
Lucas CAV said:
Tallbut Buxomly said:
Zod said:
Never let it be said that BNP supporters are illiterate morons....
Are you referring to me ??? 
Send me your address and ill send you some bubble wrap or cotton wool your choice really. You are clearly terrified of discussion or life itself.
Edited by Tallbut Buxomly on Friday 12th March 19:37
Someone ought to haul Labour up in front of an equality board. I'm pretty sure it’s discriminatory to only employ retards hell-bent on f
king the country up.
Why does this matter anyway? Getting the BNP to allow non-white members is like campaigning for the right for men to have babies!
king the country up.Why does this matter anyway? Getting the BNP to allow non-white members is like campaigning for the right for men to have babies!
Bing o said:
gamefreaks said:
Why does this matter anyway? Getting the BNP to allow non-white members is like campaigning for the right for men to have babies!
The Burmese Junta are trying to do something similar at the moment.Judith: [on Stan's desire to be a mother] Here! I've got an idea: Suppose you agree that he can't actually have babies, not having a womb - which is nobody's fault, not even the Romans' - but that he can have the *right* to have babies.
Francis: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother... sister, sorry.
Reg: What's the *point*?
Francis: What?
Reg: What's the point of fighting for his right to have babies, when he can't have babies?
Francis: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.
Reg: It's symbolic of his struggle against reality.
...
Tallbut Buxomly said:
Lucas CAV said:
Tallbut Buxomly said:
Zod said:
Never let it be said that BNP supporters are illiterate morons....
Are you referring to me ??? Send me your address and ill send you some bubble wrap or cotton wool your choice really. You are clearly terrified of discussion or life itself.
Edited by Tallbut Buxomly on Friday 12th March 19:37
You are incapable of expressing yourself coherently.
I don't think that we ought to be involved in the constitution of a political party - I am sure that such an interference by a court is actually a breach of convention. I actually think that whilst they are odious scum they are perfectly entitled to hold a political view that they wish, in what is meant to be a free and democratic society.
It really worries me how much this country has changed for the worst, state interference in every facet of our very existence.
It really worries me how much this country has changed for the worst, state interference in every facet of our very existence.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff