How did these two avoid jail??
Author
Discussion

Bill

Original Poster:

58,178 posts

282 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Two Boots employees have taken copies of teenage girls' photos over the course of 12 years, so how the hell did they only end up with a supervision order?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1258459/Bo...

jshell

12,020 posts

232 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Very strange! So, loads of photos of young teenagers posing nude and semi-nude were taken to Boots for processing over the years? And no police were called at the time by Boots employees. I suspect this has been hyped up a bit to make some news - probably why they didn't get jailed... IMHO

FourWheelDrift

92,140 posts

311 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Lack of evidence, photos were all blurry and over developed. Haven't you ever had photo's processed at Boots before? wink

Bill

Original Poster:

58,178 posts

282 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
Valid point, and I don't know what level one and two mean exactly but:

the Wail said:
were classed by police as Level One - depicting nudity or erotic posing but no sexual activity.
One photograph was classified as Level Two, which involves sexual activity between children.

poo at Paul's

14,586 posts

202 months

Wednesday 17th March 2010
quotequote all
If you look up 'pervert' in the Dictionary, I reckon it will show the photo in that story!